Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Hooks Rams OFFICIAL thread
Comments
-
12th in passer rating, 17th in passing yards, 24th in completion percentage, 28th in yards per attempt.Bob_C said:
His TD:Int ratio is the only thing he has done well. Otherwise he's mostly sucked. Completing 60.8% of your passes is shit in the modern NFL. -
The point is the Aaron Rodgers that the Seahawks would hypothetically face in the playoffs isn't the Aaron Rodgers who is a good QB. We can argue the reasons all day long (I think it's more the loss of Nelson with the OL obviously not helping) but it doesn't matter. Facing this Rodgers should scare no one this year.HuskyInAZ said: -
One of the Seahawk players tokay said that they took way too long to adjust to the Rams game plan. Which bolsters my theory that losing Dan Quinn and replacing him with Kris Richard has hurt this defense.
-
4 years ago, both rams and cardinals decided that to win the NFC West you had to be as tough/physical as the Hawks and 49ers (back then) were.
Mission accomplished. If we only played the three teams in our division for 18 games (6 times each for schedule parity) we would finish third in this division and if Harbaugh was still with the 49ers and didn't have York meddling it might be 4th.
Arizona has been able to carry this over to other teams and their record reflects it. The Rams under Fisher for whatever reason in a typical season will beat us, Arizona, New England, and this years version of Carolina, but then lose 8-10 games vs. the Miami's/Chargers/Jacksonville type teams.
Anyway, we got our shit shoved in on OL and DL today and that was the diff. along with the three turnovers. -
Did we win?
-
It was a shit game all around, but a lot of it was kind of fluky. Seahawks had a fumble returned for 6, the Rams recovered two fumbles on a TD drive. We don't deal in hypotheticals, but that's probably never happening again, at least to that extent.
The Seahawks really need Lynch. Healthy or not, he will be better than all the RB's now. -
If both the Vikings and Seahawks lose next week, it's Seahawks at Packers and Vikings at Redskins.RavennaDawg said:We are not playing at GB.
The scenarios where Minnesota moves past Seattle, but does not move past GB, are very few.
The Seahawks should know their seed prior to kicking off against ARizona.
GB wins, Seahawks win, it's Vikings at Packers and Seahawks at Skins.
Vikings win, Seahawks win/lose, Seahawks at Vikings, Packers at Skins.
With Packers/Vikings being Sunday night you're(?) not going to know your seed when you play. The Cardinals will know though whether they have a chance at the 1 seed. -
Good point, all 4 fumbles recovered by the Rams, and all 3 reviews went the Rams way. Just one of those 7 things changes and it might be a different game.RoadDawg55 said:It was a shit game all around, but a lot of it was kind of fluky. Seahawks had a fumble returned for 6, the Rams recovered two fumbles on a TD drive. We don't deal in hypotheticals, but that's probably never happening again, at least to that extent.
The Seahawks really need Lynch. Healthy or not, he will be better than all the RB's now. -
I think the Hawk players are way less concerned about who and where they play than the fans. They know they have to go on the road. They know only 2 teams in the NFC are playing decent now - Phoenix and Carolina. They knew weeks ago they had blown any shot at home field.
Never underestimate the heart of a champion. Any dynasty or run requires road wins in the post season. Either they will or they won't. Either way it could be interesting. Or not.
I think the players fully expect to go on the road and break a bunch of hearts on the way to the Super Bowl. They think they have a switch they can flip.
We'll find out
