Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The script 2016

PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,544 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
Peterman leads us to a special 10-3 season with a holiday bowl win and we talk about how 2017 will be SPECIAL.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Still too young to win 10 gaymes.

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,084 Founders Club
    Winning ten game... It's hard!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,544 Founders Club
    I forgot that we play at Oregon next year. 9 wins ;)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,526 Founders Club
    With JS as OC? Not a chance on god's green earth.

    Without him: I can see him as long as the next oc doesn't square peg/round hole with Jake trying to throw it to a group of wr's who are?????? right now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    PurpleJ said:

    Peterman leads us to a special 10-3 season with a holiday bowl win and we talk about how 2017 will be SPECIAL.

    Honestly, that is damn likely. The offseason natty this year will reach unprecedented heights not seen since 2002. Then next year will set a new bar after the 10-3 season in 2016.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,500 Founders Club
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    We had the ball and the chance to win against Boise, Cal, Utah, Arizona State and something similar vs. Oregon. We were a winning mentality away from winning all those games.

    I don't know how we get that, but we're going to need it.

    My inner doog thinks we? are very close and starting to get 'it'.

    Evidence: how we? finished the last two regular seasons. Great coaches finish strong and we keep improving.




    /doogrant
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyHalfBrainHuskyHalfBrain Member Posts: 1,311
    We'll (?) still suck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    We had the ball and the chance to win against Boise, Cal, Utah, Arizona State and something similar vs. Oregon. We were a winning mentality away from winning all those games.

    I don't know how we get that, but we're going to need it.

    So what you're saying is that we? were basically 11-2? Nice!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Peterman leads us to a special 10-3 season with a holiday bowl win and we talk about how 2017 will be SPECIAL.

    Honestly, that is damn likely. The offseason natty this year will reach unprecedented heights not seen since 2002. Then next year will set a new bar after the 10-3 season in 2016.
    The 2016 offseason natty will be the 1991 Huskies of offseason natty's.
    Haha
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,735
    ThomasFremont said:

    LawDawg1 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    Still too young to win 10 gaymes.

    HTH

    Disagree


    Q. Is it any more different, Chris, this being such a young team and so much of the frustrations this season going up and down and not only with this win but the way you finished the regular season?

    COACH PETERSEN: I don’t think we can keep saying we’re just a young team anymore. We’ve played a lot of football. You get through game five, six, seven, that’s a lot of reps. So I don’t think we’re a young team anymore. We got better through the latter part of the season, and we’re really proud.
    Or the schedule got easier, but whatever.
    Do you really think UW losses to Boise State and Cal if they played in November?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    LawDawg1 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    Still too young to win 10 gaymes.

    HTH

    Disagree


    Q. Is it any more different, Chris, this being such a young team and so much of the frustrations this season going up and down and not only with this win but the way you finished the regular season?

    COACH PETERSEN: I don’t think we can keep saying we’re just a young team anymore. We’ve played a lot of football. You get through game five, six, seven, that’s a lot of reps. So I don’t think we’re a young team anymore. We got better through the latter part of the season, and we’re really proud.
    Or the schedule got easier, but whatever.
    Do you really think UW losses to Boise State and Cal if they played in November?
    Great Oregon won the 2nd half natty post.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,544 Founders Club
    We also suck in the 1st half of games. I see a trend.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Peterman leads us to a special 10-3 season with a holiday bowl win and we talk about how 2017 will be SPECIAL.

    Honestly, that is damn likely. The offseason natty this year will reach unprecedented heights not seen since 2002. Then next year will set a new bar after the 10-3 season in 2016.
    The 2016 offseason natty will be the 1991 Huskies of offseason natty's.
    Even fucking Peterman is telling kids 2017 will be special.

    It won't be that special if Victor and Jones don't stick around. We still don't have very much depth on D. Without them, we will be starting fucking DJ Beavers and true soph Eifler.

    BBK is good, but I didn't see anything this year that makes me think he'll be an All-American (which I saw last year with JoJo, so what the fuck do I know?); And we have absolutely fucking no one at S.

    This team is pretty good, but against a seriously athletic shit-tier team we looked like dog shit and were exposed on defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    H_D said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Peterman leads us to a special 10-3 season with a holiday bowl win and we talk about how 2017 will be SPECIAL.

    Honestly, that is damn likely. The offseason natty this year will reach unprecedented heights not seen since 2002. Then next year will set a new bar after the 10-3 season in 2016.
    The 2016 offseason natty will be the 1991 Huskies of offseason natty's.
    My money is on the Cuog's offseason natty. Dare I say the "d" word?
    This.

    Twitter is full of Cuogar Natty, and Falk4Heisman aspirations. Sven doing wirk as well...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Peterman leads us to a special 10-3 season with a holiday bowl win and we talk about how 2017 will be SPECIAL.

    Honestly, that is damn likely. The offseason natty this year will reach unprecedented heights not seen since 2002. Then next year will set a new bar after the 10-3 season in 2016.
    The 2016 offseason natty will be the 1991 Huskies of offseason natty's.
    Even fucking Peterman is telling kids 2017 will be special.

    It won't be that special if Victor and Jones don't stick around. We still don't have very much depth on D. Without them, we will be starting fucking DJ Beavers and true soph Eifler.

    BBK is good, but I didn't see anything this year that makes me think he'll be an All-American (which I saw last year with JoJo, so what the fuck do I know?); And we have absolutely fucking no one at S.

    This team is pretty good, but against a seriously athletic shit-tier team we looked like dog shit and were exposed on defense.
    LB and CB are positions we've recruited really well. If we get Long and Juarez (huge if) then there may not be any drop off if Victor and Jones leave early. Plus the defense has seen guys develop. Bowl games can be an aberration. Not getting any turnovers was also an issue.

    I'm more concerned about the offense. WSU, Cal, Oregon, Stanford, USC, UCLA, Arizona, ASU all would have put up 50+ on that defense. We had 3 FG's when we were inside the 5. Granted Perkins and Pettis were out but still. Against WSU we only scored 7 offensive points in the second half despite having 170 yards (not counting final series).

    The offense needs to score more efficiently to be a good offense. A good offense scores 55 on that team. And we need to be a "good" offense to have a legit chance to win the north next year.

    Ross will help because he's a true playmaker and that gives you two go to type guys next season. But the offense loses its two best receivers (Perkins and Mickens). It desperately needs to see major development out of Pettis, Renfro and Daniels or the emergence of a clear 3rd playmaker. Daniels only caught 1 pass but at least drew 2 penalties.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.