And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose
We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.
I you want a handgun to protect yourself fine, I'm a believer in the constitution and respect the 2nd amendment. When was the last time a high capacity magazine was used in any way other than to commit mass murder? (excluding shooting contests, at ranges, etc.)
You forgot to say something about protecting the children as to why we constantly need less rights.
The only thing that stops a dictator from seizing power in this country, or some asshole official/cop from going way too far, is the the 2nd Amendment. I'll take thousands of dead every year in gang and domestic violence, over millions to billions dead in inevitable purges, because the balance in power between citizens/military is annihilated.
Does that really seem likely? This is still a relatively stable country.
Maybe you're right, maybe I'm right. I like you man (75k), but why does it matter if you die by the federal gun while holding a fully auto rifle versus holding a shotgun. Unless you have a nuke you're pretty much fucked.
Better to accumulate enough capital to get the government on your side. It's the usual method after all.
The Viet Cong, ISIS, Al Queda and Afghanistan are having big belly laughs in their media rooms.
Maybe you're right, maybe I'm right. I like you man (75k), but why does it matter if you die by the federal gun while holding a fully auto rifle versus holding a shotgun. Unless you have a nuke you're pretty much fucked.
Better to accumulate enough capital to get the government on your side. It's the usual method after all.
The Viet Cong, ISIS, Al Queda and Afghanistan are having big belly laughs in their media rooms.
Force projection is always more difficult on the other side of the world.
Maybe you're right, maybe I'm right. I like you man (75k), but why does it matter if you die by the federal gun while holding a fully auto rifle versus holding a shotgun. Unless you have a nuke you're pretty much fucked.
Better to accumulate enough capital to get the government on your side. It's the usual method after all.
The Viet Cong, ISIS, Al Queda and Afghanistan are having big belly laughs in their media rooms.
Force projection is always more difficult on the other side of the world.
I was responding to the comment about being fucked unless the combatent has a nuke. Clearly not the case
And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose
We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.
I you want a handgun to protect yourself fine, I'm a believer in the constitution and respect the 2nd amendment. When was the last time a high capacity magazine was used in any way other than to commit mass murder? (excluding shooting contests, at ranges, etc.)
You forgot to say something about protecting the children as to why we constantly need less rights.
The only thing that stops a dictator from seizing power in this country, or some asshole official/cop from going way too far, is the the 2nd Amendment. I'll take thousands of dead every year in gang and domestic violence, over millions to billions dead in inevitable purges, because the balance in power between citizens/military is annihilated.
If the government wants to take control of the country by force, some assault rifles and high capacity mags won't do much against tanks and planes.
I totally respect the 2nd amendment, but to cling to guns as a method of limiting control of the government is FS.
So how many of you fucks, pimpin the NRA, actually own a fully automatic assault weapon with high capacity magazines.
I doubt any one of you do. But please do carry on.
Why would I get a full auto? You set yourself up for yearly inspections with the ATF by owning a full auto. The less the government knows about me or what I own the better.
And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose
We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.
I you want a handgun to protect yourself fine, I'm a believer in the constitution and respect the 2nd amendment. When was the last time a high capacity magazine was used in any way other than to commit mass murder? (excluding shooting contests, at ranges, etc.)
You forgot to say something about protecting the children as to why we constantly need less rights.
The only thing that stops a dictator from seizing power in this country, or some asshole official/cop from going way too far, is the the 2nd Amendment. I'll take thousands of dead every year in gang and domestic violence, over millions to billions dead in inevitable purges, because the balance in power between citizens/military is annihilated.
Does that really seem likely? This is still a relatively stable country.
Seems unlikely now, but in 50-100 years I wouldn't rule it out
And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose
We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.
I you want a handgun to protect yourself fine, I'm a believer in the constitution and respect the 2nd amendment. When was the last time a high capacity magazine was used in any way other than to commit mass murder? (excluding shooting contests, at ranges, etc.)
You forgot to say something about protecting the children as to why we constantly need less rights.
The only thing that stops a dictator from seizing power in this country, or some asshole official/cop from going way too far, is the the 2nd Amendment. I'll take thousands of dead every year in gang and domestic violence, over millions to billions dead in inevitable purges, because the balance in power between citizens/military is annihilated.
Does that really seem likely? This is still a relatively stable country.
Seems unlikely now, but in 50-100 years I wouldn't rule it out
Just like the ban on fully automatic weapons in 1934? Or what about the Brady bill in 1994 that was rolled back in 2004? All slippery slopes to gun confiscation.
Or how about the confiscation of 600k assault rifles in Australia in 1996?
The only thing that stops a dictator from seizing power in this country, or some asshole official/cop from going way too far, is the the 2nd Amendment. I'll take thousands of dead every year in gang and domestic violence, over millions to billions dead in inevitable purges, because the balance in power between citizens/military is annihilated.
Yeah because rednecks with no formal training are a huge threat to the strongest military on the planet.
Yeah, just like a bunch of rice paddy farmers in Viet Nam weren't a huge threat to the French (ROFL) or the strongest military on the planet. Just like a bunch of Shia and Sunni fucks weren't a threat to the strongest military on the planet.
Everyone who fucking says this acts like no insurgency anywhere has ever succeeded. Fucking Castro left Mexico with 150 or dudes, got caught in a storm and something like 20 or less made it to Cuba without drowning or getting captured.
Comments
I doubt any one of you do. But please do carry on.
I totally respect the 2nd amendment, but to cling to guns as a method of limiting control of the government is FS.
Such amazing amounts of inadvertent profiling and racism.
Or how about the confiscation of 600k assault rifles in Australia in 1996?
Oh wait.
Everyone who fucking says this acts like no insurgency anywhere has ever succeeded. Fucking Castro left Mexico with 150 or dudes, got caught in a storm and something like 20 or less made it to Cuba without drowning or getting captured.