Profiles in Courage: Seattle Times Opinion Piece on Gun Control

PurpleJ

seattletimes.com/opinion/editorials/its-time-to-ban-assault-style-weapons-high-capacity-magazines/
Does it still count as an opinion when it's the regurgitated ramblings of every mouth breathing libtard fuck? Nuke this fucking city already.

GrundleStiltzkin

FTGs.









I only read the headline.

PurpleJ

So your FOR murder and violence?

dhdawg

And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose

DeepSeaZ

dhdawg said:

And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose

Hey dummie. The hold more rounds. Changing mags sucks.

PurpleJ

dhdawg said:

And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose

We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.

doogsinparadise

PurpleJ said:

dhdawg said:

And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose

We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.

This isn't fucking Nam, there are consequences to allowing people to be armed like fucking Rambo.

PurpleJ

doogsinparadise said:

PurpleJ said:

dhdawg said:

And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose

We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.

This isn't fucking Nam, there are consequences to allowing people to be armed like fucking Rambo.

But it's cool if the government does it. They keep us safe.

doogsinparadise

Maybe you're right, maybe I'm right. I like you man (75k), but why does it matter if you die by the federal gun while holding a fully auto rifle versus holding a shotgun. Unless you have a nuke you're pretty much fucked.

Better to accumulate enough capital to get the government on your side. It's the usual method after all.

dhdawg

PurpleJ said:

dhdawg said:

And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose

We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.

I you want a handgun to protect yourself fine, I'm a believer in the constitution and respect the 2nd amendment. When was the last time a high capacity magazine was used in any way other than to commit mass murder? (excluding shooting contests, at ranges, etc.)

GrundleStiltzkin

dhdawg said:

PurpleJ said:

dhdawg said:

And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose

We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.

I you want a handgun to protect yourself fine, I'm a believer in the constitution and respect the 2nd amendment. When was the last time a high capacity magazine was used in any way other than to commit mass murder? (excluding shooting contests, at ranges, etc.)

Don't be so quick to dismiss all legal use of full capacity magazines as an "etc.". You're putting the 0.001% case a head of the 99.999% of the rest of the time.