Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Profiles in Courage: Seattle Times Opinion Piece on Gun Control

135

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,262 Standard Supporter
    priapism said:

    dhdawg said:

    PurpleJ said:

    dhdawg said:

    And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose

    We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.
    I you want a handgun to protect yourself fine, I'm a believer in the constitution and respect the 2nd amendment. When was the last time a high capacity magazine was used in any way other than to commit mass murder? (excluding shooting contests, at ranges, etc.)
    You forgot to say something about protecting the children as to why we constantly need less rights.

    The only thing that stops a dictator from seizing power in this country, or some asshole official/cop from going way too far, is the the 2nd Amendment. I'll take thousands of dead every year in gang and domestic violence, over millions to billions dead in inevitable purges, because the balance in power between citizens/military is annihilated.
    Does that really seem likely? This is still a relatively stable country.
  • WeAreAFatLesboSchool
    WeAreAFatLesboSchool Guest Posts: 736
    edited December 2015

    Maybe you're right, maybe I'm right. I like you man (75k), but why does it matter if you die by the federal gun while holding a fully auto rifle versus holding a shotgun. Unless you have a nuke you're pretty much fucked.

    Better to accumulate enough capital to get the government on your side. It's the usual method after all.

    The Viet Cong, ISIS, Al Queda and Afghanistan are having big belly laughs in their media rooms.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    Maybe you're right, maybe I'm right. I like you man (75k), but why does it matter if you die by the federal gun while holding a fully auto rifle versus holding a shotgun. Unless you have a nuke you're pretty much fucked.

    Better to accumulate enough capital to get the government on your side. It's the usual method after all.

    The Viet Cong, ISIS, Al Queda and Afghanistan are having big belly laughs in their media rooms.
    Force projection is always more difficult on the other side of the world.
  • Maybe you're right, maybe I'm right. I like you man (75k), but why does it matter if you die by the federal gun while holding a fully auto rifle versus holding a shotgun. Unless you have a nuke you're pretty much fucked.

    Better to accumulate enough capital to get the government on your side. It's the usual method after all.

    The Viet Cong, ISIS, Al Queda and Afghanistan are having big belly laughs in their media rooms.
    Force projection is always more difficult on the other side of the world.
    I was responding to the comment about being fucked unless the combatent has a nuke. Clearly not the case
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    And there's the difference between existential and non-existential threats.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    So how many of you fucks, pimpin the NRA, actually own a fully automatic assault weapon with high capacity magazines.

    I doubt any one of you do. But please do carry on.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    priapism said:

    dhdawg said:

    PurpleJ said:

    dhdawg said:

    And they're right. There is literally no point in civilians having high capacity magazines. They serve no purpose

    We should be able to own any gun we want to. Full auto. Infrared. High capacity. Fuck off.
    I you want a handgun to protect yourself fine, I'm a believer in the constitution and respect the 2nd amendment. When was the last time a high capacity magazine was used in any way other than to commit mass murder? (excluding shooting contests, at ranges, etc.)
    You forgot to say something about protecting the children as to why we constantly need less rights.

    The only thing that stops a dictator from seizing power in this country, or some asshole official/cop from going way too far, is the the 2nd Amendment. I'll take thousands of dead every year in gang and domestic violence, over millions to billions dead in inevitable purges, because the balance in power between citizens/military is annihilated.
    If the government wants to take control of the country by force, some assault rifles and high capacity mags won't do much against tanks and planes.

    I totally respect the 2nd amendment, but to cling to guns as a method of limiting control of the government is FS.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Fuck off. Everybody know why CAIR wants to seize guns.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Fuck off. Everybody know why CAIR wants to seize guns.

    To put your mom in her place?
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    You tell us. It's your religion, your campaign.