#OurDaniels
Comments
-
Too bad he's a WR
-
Fucking Duh. The fact that he wasn't targeted more this year was a crime.
-
See Smith, JonathanDennis_DeYoung said:Fucking Duh. The fact that he wasn't targeted more this year was a crime.
-
That's cool, but slightly ridiculous. Daniels was the 2nd string TE and caught about 1 pass a game. How is Duarte from UCLA or one of the Stanford guys not the top TE?
-
PFF is grading for the pro game. Measurables > Productionbananasnblondes said:That's cool, but slightly ridiculous. Daniels was the 2nd string TE and caught about 1 pass a game. How is Duarte from UCLA or one of the Stanford guys not the top TE?
-
Daniels is a lot like Marcel Reece. Big, fast, and underutilized in college.
-
String?bananasnblondes said:That's cool, but slightly ridiculous. Daniels was the 2nd string TE and caught about 1 pass a game. How is Duarte from UCLA or one of the Stanford guys not the top TE?
ISAFNRC! -
So, what you're saying is you can't figure out how the ratings work?bananasnblondes said:That's cool, but slightly ridiculous. Daniels was the 2nd string TE and caught about 1 pass a game. How is Duarte from UCLA or one of the Stanford guys not the top TE?
-
I had no idea he was so cerebral.
-
SRS has Daniels on the Pac-12's All Century team.
-
Excited to see what he can do next year.
-
Where does SRS+ have him?DerekJohnson said:SRS has Daniels on the Pac-12's All Century team.
-
6-6.
NOC -
No, I'm saying it's bullshit.Dennis_DeYoung said:
So, what you're saying is you can't figure out how the ratings work?bananasnblondes said:That's cool, but slightly ridiculous. Daniels was the 2nd string TE and caught about 1 pass a game. How is Duarte from UCLA or one of the Stanford guys not the top TE?
Almost everybody else on this list is a big name all-conference player, then you have Darell Daniels. According to their metric, he caught a higher % of the balls thrown to him than other TEs. That's a meaningless statistic if there's only one play a game drawn up for you. Shit, Corey Fuvai probably gave up less sacks than Josh Garnett this year. Put his suddenly-seniored ass on the list.
That being said, Daniels is awesome and I think he'll produce a ton NEXT YEAR -
What a brave poast.bananasnblondes said:
No, I'm saying it's bullshit.Dennis_DeYoung said:
So, what you're saying is you can't figure out how the ratings work?bananasnblondes said:That's cool, but slightly ridiculous. Daniels was the 2nd string TE and caught about 1 pass a game. How is Duarte from UCLA or one of the Stanford guys not the top TE?
Almost everybody else on this list is a big name all-conference player, then you have Darell Daniels. According to their metric, he caught a higher % of the balls thrown to him than other TEs. That's a meaningless statistic if there's only one play a game drawn up for you. Shit, Corey Fuvai probably gave up less sacks than Josh Garnett this year. Put his suddenly-seniored ass on the list.
That being said, Daniels is awesome and I think he'll produce a ton NEXT YEAR -
This thread would be better served pointing out how Pease was a shitty position coach, Paopao hasn't done a thing to make anybody believe that he's a good coach, and Smith not being smart enough to figure out a way to get one of his better offensive players into the game more.
-
It was stupid for the previous coaching staff to play him in 2013. Unless they promised him he'd play as a true frosh, why didn't they redshirt him?
Anyway, I'll courageously say Smith HAS to get more creative in getting the ball to Daniels. He doesn't have the hands to be a WR but I love how some other teams use their TEs...Stanford ran a shovel pass to the left with the TE on the right side of LOS, dipping down and inside to take the shovel and get upfield. Think it was a gain of nearly 10 yards.
Ideally he improves as a blocker so there's less reason to take him off the field. -
S
No offense but I call bullshit!HFNY said:It was stupid for the previous coaching staff to play him in 2013. Unless they promised him he'd play as a true frosh, why didn't they redshirt him?
Anyway, I'll courageously say Smith HAS to get more creative in getting the ball to Daniels. He doesn't have the hands to be a WR but I love how some other teams use their TEs...Stanford ran a shovel pass to the left with the TE on the right side of LOS, dipping down and inside to take the shovel and get upfield. Think it was a gain of nearly 10 yards.
Ideally he improves as a blocker so there's less reason to take him off the field.
How the fuck doesn't he have the hands to catch the ball across the middle, quick outs and slants??? Are his hands any worse than Marvin Hall?
-
I don't agree with this. I think the TEs have shown in '15. Lack of production is pinned on Polishgrandma. Perkins had a solid year. DD is developing (better in pass game than blocking). Sample had a strong rFR year and is a strong blocker. Ajamu was developing before the injury. Not saying he's indispensible, but Poopoo isn't dreck either.Tequilla said:This thread would be better served pointing out how Pease was a shitty position coach, Paopao hasn't done a thing to make anybody believe that he's a good coach, and Smith not being smart enough to figure out a way to get one of his better offensive players into the game more.
-
Our TEs were average and what the fuck has he done in recruiting? Who gives a shit who coaches tight tends?AEB said:
I don't agree with this. I think the TEs have shown in '15. Lack of production is pinned on Polishgrandma. Perkins had a solid year. DD is developing (better in pass game than blocking). Sample had a strong rFR year and is a strong blocker. Ajamu was developing before the injury. Not saying he's indispensible, but Poopoo isn't dreck either.Tequilla said:This thread would be better served pointing out how Pease was a shitty position coach, Paopao hasn't done a thing to make anybody believe that he's a good coach, and Smith not being smart enough to figure out a way to get one of his better offensive players into the game more.
He's only on staff because we needed a Poly guy (sadly the state of things); what has he done? Dick.
