Today's SEC corruption...
Comments
-
The Cuogs were in the top 20.RoadDawg55 said:
I like to downplay wins over top 10-15 teams. It's what I like to do. How many top 10-15 teams has Alabama beaten?PurpleThrobber said:
Natl championship caliber teams don't put themselves in a position to lose to Mike fucking Riley due to refs.doogsinparadise said:
Lost to the refs while playing Mike Riley, but sure.PurpleThrobber said:
*lost to Mike Riley.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
*beat Michigan on pure stupidity by Harbaugh.
*beat Oregon with VAJ and a broken finger.
Fags like Jude vote on that shit.
-
Whatever you want to believe Throbber. Were Ohio State and Iowa bad wins too?PurpleThrobber said:
The Cuogs were in the top 20.RoadDawg55 said:
I like to downplay wins over top 10-15 teams. It's what I like to do. How many top 10-15 teams has Alabama beaten?PurpleThrobber said:
Natl championship caliber teams don't put themselves in a position to lose to Mike fucking Riley due to refs.doogsinparadise said:
Lost to the refs while playing Mike Riley, but sure.PurpleThrobber said:
*lost to Mike Riley.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
*beat Michigan on pure stupidity by Harbaugh.
*beat Oregon with VAJ and a broken finger.
Fags like Jude vote on that shit. -
I'm hearing they play the games on the field for a reason. That said, I like Bama to win it all.
-
I like the idea of rewarding the teams that are playing the best by the end of the year. If the playoff was around in the Pete Carroll era, USC would have skull fucked the country for at least 4 titles.
-
Good thing they didn't do that last year.RaceBannon said:Just crown the winner of the SEC championship game
-
The old system would have Alabama vs Clemson in the Sugar Bowl, Oklahoma vs Iowa in the Orang Bowl, Stanford vs MSU in the Rose Bowl and OSU vs ND in the Fiesta Bowl. And if Clemson won, they would be handed a poll title; if Alabama won, then the 1-loss teams would all be arguing. Probably better than the current system, and the conference seasons would be more fun, and New Year's Day would no longer be ruined.
Or you can go to the system I have been advocating for a while: Pac 12 vs Big 10 in Rose Bowl, SEC vs Big 12 in Sugar Bowl, winners in the Jerry Bowl. Champion gets the bonus trophy.
People forget the new system is still not an NCAA playoff. It is just another private group deciding how it wants to make a champion.
Bowls make money, and they all get better ratings than weeknight NBA or NCAA bball games, so they will be sticking around for a while. -
Post the schedules bitch. Let puppy expose 'your' hind licking conference and "UA team" for what they are.PurpleJ said:Doesn't really matter who's 2 and who's 3 on a neutral field, does it now PuppyFS? Let them play the games and plug up your cunt. All the deserving teams got in. They all won their respective conferences. So shut the fuck up and let em play dipshit.
-
Does matter new fish bitch. It keeps Alabama from playing Oklahoma or Clemson, 2 teams who would roll the tide. Committee wants easiest path for Alabama and the SEC. No question bama should be 4 with their schedule and performance vs Florida Atlantic. Of course That couldnt happen. So lets keep bambam at #2 (most unwarranted ranking ive ever seen in my 30 years) and bump Oklahoma (the team most certain to beat bambi) to #4 to protect them.Mad_Son said:Who even cares about who is 2 or 3? The teams play each other... 1/2 and 3/4 are the real ranks to quibble over if you care to quibble.
Rankings make a huge fucking deal 1-4. Alabama has done NOTHING to warrant their cemented-in #2 ranking. The schedules show the blatant corruption at the top -
I know winners win and losers lose, but that Michigan win deserves an asterisk.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
They should be #2 but in the end it doesn't matter -
Alabama didn't play Florida Atlanticpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Does matter new fish bitch. It keeps Alabama from playing Oklahoma or Clemson, 2 teams who would roll the tide. Committee wants easiest path for Alabama and the SEC. No question bama should be 4 with their schedule and performance vs Florida Atlantic. Of course That couldnt happen. So lets keep bambam at #2 (most unwarranted ranking ive ever seen in my 30 years) and bump Oklahoma (the team most certain to beat bambi) to #4 to protect them.Mad_Son said:Who even cares about who is 2 or 3? The teams play each other... 1/2 and 3/4 are the real ranks to quibble over if you care to quibble.
Rankings make a huge fucking deal 1-4. Alabama has done NOTHING to warrant their cemented-in #2 ranking. The schedules show the blatant corruption at the top
