Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Today's SEC corruption...

puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
in Hardcore Husky Board
#2 Alabama above Sparta. Lets compare schedules shall we. J, post the schedules so I can beat you and Race up.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,019 Founders Club
    Doesn't really matter who's 2 and who's 3 on a neutral field, does it now PuppyFS? Let them play the games and plug up your cunt. All the deserving teams got in. They all won their respective conferences. So shut the fuck up and let em play dipshit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,825
    edited December 2015
    PurpleJ said:

    Doesn't really matter who's 2 and who's 3 on a neutral field, does it now PuppyFS? Let them play the games and plug up your cunt. All the deserving teams got in. They all won their respective conferences. So shut the fuck up and let em play dipshit.

    You'd be saying the exact opposite if Bammer was #3
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    J?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 43,678 Standard Supporter
    RoadDawg55 said:

    The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.

    *lost to Mike Riley.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    PurpleThrobber said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.

    *lost to Mike Riley.

    Lost to the refs while playing Mike Riley, but sure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,677 Founders Club
    It's going to be a great playoff decided on the field. Sparty is a tough match up. I expect a low scoring game decided at the end. Toss up. Can't wait.

    Clemson OU should be wide open. Going to be a great night

    Anyone notice how ESPN pumped crowd noise into the CBS broadcast? #HiPuppy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,717 Swaye's Wigwam
    I miss the BCS.

    Imagine the shitshow we'd be having on our forums if it were Clemson-Bama and Oklahoma and Michigan State were left out.

    Fuck, like a retirement home it is around here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 43,678 Standard Supporter
    doogsinparadise said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.

    *lost to Mike Riley.

    Lost to the refs while playing Mike Riley, but sure.
    Natl championship caliber teams don't put themselves in a position to lose to Mike fucking Riley due to refs.

    *beat Michigan on pure stupidity by Harbaugh.

    *beat Oregon with VAJ and a broken finger.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    The playoff is fucking stupid.

    This is not, in any sense, an improvement over any other system.

    If Clemson loses a close game, they will have a super high quality loss (something that none of these other teams have) and the same record as the winner.

    If they lose in the title game, they'll have more quality wins.

    You can't have 110 teams, 5 leagues, varying schedules and accurately find the 'best' team.

    This is the reason I've always been against a 'playoff' because it solves nothing.

    The beauty of college football was always that every game mattered. Now, you can lose to a Shit team in October and so long as the committee thinks you're good, it doesn't matter.

    If you move to 4 conferences with 16 teams, championship games, normal bowl tie ins and then a final game, at least that makes sense.

    This system is just as dumb as the BCS (probably worse) and definitely worse than the voting system.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,677 Founders Club
    Just crown the winner of the SEC championship game
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,489 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2015
    Mad_Son said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    The playoff is fucking stupid.

    This is not, in any sense, an improvement over any other system.

    If Clemson loses a close game, they will have a super high quality loss (something that none of these other teams have) and the same record as the winner.

    If they lose in the title game, they'll have more quality wins.

    You can't have 110 teams, 5 leagues, varying schedules and accurately find the 'best' team.

    This is the reason I've always been against a 'playoff' because it solves nothing.

    The beauty of college football was always that every game mattered. Now, you can lose to a Shit team in October and so long as the committee thinks you're good, it doesn't matter.

    If you move to 4 conferences with 16 teams, championship games, normal bowl tie ins and then a final game, at least that makes sense.

    This system is just as dumb as the BCS (probably worse) and definitely worse than the voting system.

    Agree. The BCS and Playoff are a farce. Just go back to how the bowls were pre-BCS and let us argue about who the champion is.
    image


    I absolutely had to edit that because of race's 5.3 seconds. He's quick for an old guy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,825
    PurpleThrobber said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.

    *lost to Mike Riley.

    Lost to the refs while playing Mike Riley, but sure.
    Natl championship caliber teams don't put themselves in a position to lose to Mike fucking Riley due to refs.

    *beat Michigan on pure stupidity by Harbaugh.

    *beat Oregon with VAJ and a broken finger.


    Beat Ohio on the road with a backup QB

    Beat undefeated Iowa on a neutral field with a 22 play game winning drive that took the balance of the 4th quarter

    Sparty is beyond deserving and has the best resume of all the 1 loss teams
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    I would've taken Iowa over Oklahoma just to piss everyone off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,919 Swaye's Wigwam
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    If Iowa wins their bowl game and Oklahoma wins the 'Natty', how the FUCK is Iowa not a co-national champion?

    Iowa's ONE FUCKING LOSS came on a neutral field to one of the best teams in CFB in the last fucking seconds of the game. Oklahoma's one loss came to a shit team on a neutral field and they got beasted.

    So, games in October don't matter? You're saying that a team should be punished more for losing a cunt-hair close game to fucking fired the fuck up Michigan State at a neutral site than losing to a shit tier Texas team in October?

    It's literally the dumbest fucking thing ever.

    Everyone who wants a playoff is blinded by the 'settle it on the field' gobbledy gook and is too fucking stupid to think it through.

    Yeah, but you could make a better case for the defending national champions whose one less was to that same MSU team. OSU would skullfuck Iowa. Neither system is perfect, but the BCS was worse.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,567 Founders Club
    While I liked and miss the old New Years Day bowls, the old system brought us the 1984 BYU national championship, split NC's, and a ton of uncertainty. I can't believe people really miss that...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    If Iowa wins their bowl game and Oklahoma wins the 'Natty', how the FUCK is Iowa not a co-national champion?

    Iowa's ONE FUCKING LOSS came on a neutral field to one of the best teams in CFB in the last fucking seconds of the game. Oklahoma's one loss came to a shit team on a neutral field and they got beasted.

    So, games in October don't matter? You're saying that a team should be punished more for losing a cunt-hair close game to fucking fired the fuck up Michigan State at a neutral site than losing to a shit tier Texas team in October?

    It's literally the dumbest fucking thing ever.

    Everyone who wants a playoff is blinded by the 'settle it on the field' gobbledy gook and is too fucking stupid to think it through.

    Iowa left out? Sounds like you want an 8 team playoff.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.