Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

ESECPN in full spin mode...

1567911

Comments

  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    EwaDawg said:

    We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

    The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

    I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

    The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

    That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

    Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

    UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.
    Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

    They barely survived WSU
    And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.
    Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.
    Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

    Five road games is easier than four road games?

    Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?



    NO. NO. and NO.



    Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).



    Stanford plays the Pac 12 north

    Hope this helps
    And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.

    The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.
    Your string of repeating everything that everyone else said in this thread while misquoting me was going along quite nicely until this piece of shit post.

    Coogs gonna doog
    Oh so you weren't fluffing SC earlier in this thread?

    Today, Racebannon, you are the fucking King of Doog Island
    Has any Pac 12 team beat the top SEC when it mattered other than USC? Has any Pac 12 team won a national title since 1991 other than USC? Coogs hate facts. But love to fluff

    Go figure

    I hate quooks, but Oregon was just as good as Auburn in 2010 IMO.

    That fluke play where the auburn ball carrier ran for 50 yards into field goal range after appearing to be down was the difference in the game. Really should have gone into OT.

    Great doog hypotheticals post, as always.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,757 Founders Club
    PurpleJ said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    EwaDawg said:

    We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

    The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

    I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

    The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

    That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

    Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

    UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.
    Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

    They barely survived WSU
    And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.
    Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.
    Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

    Five road games is easier than four road games?

    Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?



    NO. NO. and NO.



    Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).



    Stanford plays the Pac 12 north

    Hope this helps
    And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.

    The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.
    Your string of repeating everything that everyone else said in this thread while misquoting me was going along quite nicely until this piece of shit post.

    Coogs gonna doog
    Oh so you weren't fluffing SC earlier in this thread?

    Today, Racebannon, you are the fucking King of Doog Island
    Has any Pac 12 team beat the top SEC when it mattered other than USC? Has any Pac 12 team won a national title since 1991 other than USC? Coogs hate facts. But love to fluff

    Go figure

    I hate quooks, but Oregon was just as good as Auburn in 2010 IMO.

    That fluke play where the auburn ball carrier ran for 50 yards into field goal range after appearing to be down was the difference in the game. Really should have gone into OT.

    Great doog hypotheticals post, as always.
    I know you're being such fag J but we don't deal with hypotheticals around here.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773

    PurpleJ said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    EwaDawg said:

    We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

    The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

    I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

    The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

    That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

    Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

    UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.
    Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

    They barely survived WSU
    And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.
    Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.
    Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

    Five road games is easier than four road games?

    Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?



    NO. NO. and NO.



    Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).



    Stanford plays the Pac 12 north

    Hope this helps
    And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.

    The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.
    Your string of repeating everything that everyone else said in this thread while misquoting me was going along quite nicely until this piece of shit post.

    Coogs gonna doog
    Oh so you weren't fluffing SC earlier in this thread?

    Today, Racebannon, you are the fucking King of Doog Island
    Has any Pac 12 team beat the top SEC when it mattered other than USC? Has any Pac 12 team won a national title since 1991 other than USC? Coogs hate facts. But love to fluff

    Go figure

    I hate quooks, but Oregon was just as good as Auburn in 2010 IMO.

    That fluke play where the auburn ball carrier ran for 50 yards into field goal range after appearing to be down was the difference in the game. Really should have gone into OT.

    Great doog hypotheticals post, as always.
    I know you're being such fag J but we don't deal with hypotheticals around here.
    We? I see lots of hypotheticals coming from SEC haters today.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    I became a Bama fan when they hired Saban and we kept Ty

    Hope this helps

    7 straight

    Puppy was sucking Ty's cock.

    A coach needs 5 years, minimum. Right Pup???
    Well thanks for contributing Tommy. 5 years absolutely. Theres your answer now go back into the closet.
    Air. Force. At. Home.


    Enough said.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Until theres a cure for the hiv, herps you keep that catchers mitt of an asshole away me you freak fuck.

    So to be clear, once there's a cure, you're DTF???
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,796 Founders Club

    Until theres a cure for the hiv, herps you keep that catchers mitt of an asshole away me you freak fuck.

    lol.

    How did I miss this thread? Puppy is right to an extent. Roadies take is probably the most accurate. I will say the hype train has definitely worked in the SEC favor.

    All other things being equal, the fighter with the most confidence wins everytime. It took 3 missed extra points for LSU to beat Oregon state in death valley. That kicker ended up winning the Lou Groza. Just one example, but the conference went on a great run and that aura helped seal the deal in a lot of games.

    Since FSU won and the BIG bent them over last bowl season the mystique of the conference has lessened significantly. The SEC does a great job at protecting itself. They hold all the chips.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773

    Until theres a cure for the hiv, herps you keep that catchers mitt of an asshole away me you freak fuck.

    Didn't MLK Jr. fight for a world where a man can be judged by the content of his character, rather than the shape of his fuckanus?
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    EwaDawg said:

    We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

    The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

    I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

    The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

    That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

    Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

    UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.
    Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

    They barely survived WSU
    And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.
    Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.
    Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

    Five road games is easier than four road games?

    Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?



    NO. NO. and NO.



    Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).



    Stanford plays the Pac 12 north

    Hope this helps
    And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.

    The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.
    Your string of repeating everything that everyone else said in this thread while misquoting me was going along quite nicely until this piece of shit post.

    Coogs gonna doog
    Oh so you weren't fluffing SC earlier in this thread?

    Today, Racebannon, you are the fucking King of Doog Island
    Has any Pac 12 team beat the top SEC when it mattered other than USC? Has any Pac 12 team won a national title since 1991 other than USC? Coogs hate facts. But love to fluff

    Go figure

    I hate quooks, but Oregon was just as good as Auburn in 2010 IMO.

    That fluke play where the auburn ball carrier ran for 50 yards into field goal range after appearing to be down was the difference in the game. Really should have gone into OT.

    Maybe if Darron Thomas hadn't been hurt

    Oregon lost. It was all over the web
    It wasnt Darron Thomas, it was dennis dixon who got hurt. UO was bcs bound. DT went pro as RS soph and eve r ybody thought UO was done. As usual they just reloaded.

    Race Ill pick out every inconsistency you flood this bored with
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,553 Founders Club

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    EwaDawg said:

    We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

    The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

    I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

    The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

    That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

    Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

    UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.
    Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

    They barely survived WSU
    And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.
    Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.
    Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

    Five road games is easier than four road games?

    Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?



    NO. NO. and NO.



    Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).



    Stanford plays the Pac 12 north

    Hope this helps
    And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.

    The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.
    Your string of repeating everything that everyone else said in this thread while misquoting me was going along quite nicely until this piece of shit post.

    Coogs gonna doog
    Oh so you weren't fluffing SC earlier in this thread?

    Today, Racebannon, you are the fucking King of Doog Island
    Has any Pac 12 team beat the top SEC when it mattered other than USC? Has any Pac 12 team won a national title since 1991 other than USC? Coogs hate facts. But love to fluff

    Go figure

    I hate quooks, but Oregon was just as good as Auburn in 2010 IMO.

    That fluke play where the auburn ball carrier ran for 50 yards into field goal range after appearing to be down was the difference in the game. Really should have gone into OT.

    Maybe if Darron Thomas hadn't been hurt

    Oregon lost. It was all over the web
    It wasnt Darron Thomas, it was dennis dixon who got hurt. UO was bcs bound. DT went pro as RS soph and eve r ybody thought UO was done. As usual they just reloaded.

    Race Ill pick out every inconsistency you flood this bored with
    You quack like a doog