ESECPN in full spin mode...
Comments
-
dnc said:
The SEC East blows. The SEC West is really good.PostGameOrangeSlices said:The SEC is so good that FSU buttfucked Florida to the tune of 27 to 2
Water is wet.
How about we let it play out.
Big Ten is easily the best conference so far.
-
We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well. -
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well. -
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU -
And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.RaceBannon said:
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU -
Stanford is poorly coached as well and managed to NOT make the playoffs yet again, Hogan is a journeyman at best, like most SEC quarterbacks. They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule. So yes, they could beat Bama, but like Ole Miss they would end up with nothing to show for it.RoadDawg55 said:
And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.RaceBannon said:
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU -
butt is he a fuckanus?PurpleJ said:
But how is PGOS a terrorist socialism muslim hipster douchebag that hates America?dnc said:
The SEC East blows. The SEC West is really good.PostGameOrangeSlices said:The SEC is so good that FSU buttfucked Florida to the tune of 27 to 2
Water is wet. -
Cant make this shit up. College football has nothing to do with just winning or losing anymore. Back in the good ole days, before 80% of you puckerhuffers here even watched the game, you won the title by WINNING. And winning RECENTLY when it mattered. If you lost recently you could kiss your ass goodbye.RaceBannon said:
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU
Now, literally in the last few weeks, its about how you won vs the top 40. Throw out the AP top25, guess its irrelevant now as it hurts the SEC. Remember the SEC had 10 teams in top25? Now there is basically one that deserves to be there, so that poll doesnt matter for the playoff. What a laugher but I digress.
Its not that you won, its about how good your backups are if a starter goes down (which is purely subjective and no way to know) Even though you won a game, the committee now decides if THEY think your backups can compete in the playoff.
Iowa is undefeated but t he committee decides if THEY think iowa is good enough. The committee made up its mind about Bama pre-season, even though everyone outside the SEC saw they have the worst QB of all power 5 contenders, beat 1 ranked team, lost at home to ole miss and needed a miracle at home vs horrible tennessee. Oh and barely beat Auburn (the 2nd-3rd worst team in SEC.
Make it stop. Nothing has to do with winning and more importantly losing anymore. The silly metrics, SEC bias and a woman deciding who the best teams are is ludicrous. Im about ready to bid farewell to the new and unimproved college game. Cant stand it. Onne way to keep my interest? Put Bama at 5 tonight when rankings come out. Make them beat Florida Atlantic un SEC title game this weekend to even be considered. There a 4 MUCH MORE DESERVING TEAMS right now. -
Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?RaceBannon said:
Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.RaceBannon said:
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU
Five road games is easier than four road games?
Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?
NO. NO. and NO.
Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).
-
I'm gonna start calling @PostGameOrangeSlices "POS" because he has no game.AZDuck said:
butt is he a fuckanus?PurpleJ said:
But how is PGOS a terrorist socialism muslim hipster douchebag that hates America?dnc said:
The SEC East blows. The SEC West is really good.PostGameOrangeSlices said:The SEC is so good that FSU buttfucked Florida to the tune of 27 to 2
Water is wet.
