Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
ESECPN in full spin mode...
puppylove_sugarsteel
Member Posts: 9,133
In regards to Alabama's laughable #1 SOS played. In case you arent aware, Alabama has beat 1 FUCKING TEAM CURRENTLY RANKED IN TOP 25. So the spin nurses at espn put out this stat: Alabama is 8-1 vs "Top 40 " competition. Haha.
Every 11-1, 10-2, team in the top15 can say the same. How about the 11-1 teams who've beat top 25 competition? That's the metric EVERYONE but ESECPN uses.
There should not be an SEC team in the top 6 Ohio St , Sparty, tOSU, Okahoma all deserve it much more.
Answer me J, Race and the rest of your sounders fans? How is Alabama sitting a t #2 above the aforementioned teams given what we know after the regular season. How can ANYBODY say alabama has the #1 SOS? Just because ESPN says so? You 2 turds have been ducking this issue the last 2 weeks. Speak fucko's!
Every 11-1, 10-2, team in the top15 can say the same. How about the 11-1 teams who've beat top 25 competition? That's the metric EVERYONE but ESECPN uses.
There should not be an SEC team in the top 6 Ohio St , Sparty, tOSU, Okahoma all deserve it much more.
Answer me J, Race and the rest of your sounders fans? How is Alabama sitting a t #2 above the aforementioned teams given what we know after the regular season. How can ANYBODY say alabama has the #1 SOS? Just because ESPN says so? You 2 turds have been ducking this issue the last 2 weeks. Speak fucko's!
Comments
-
yep because Ohio State had played such a challenging schedule, give me a break
-
SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.
-
-
If Sparty beats #4 iowa, they have beat basically 3 top 10 teams and the currently best ranked team in the pac 12.
Alabama's case? Uh, um, uh a reeling LSU team and a florida team who all pundits agree shouldnt be ranked at all. #1 SOS? Who besides espn and funny ears finebaum buys that shit?
If EVER there's a case for 2 teams from same conference in olayoff its now. Sparty, tOSU and Iowa should all be in playoff above the auto shoe-in SEC team.
Cant wait for Stoopsie to roundpound Saban and Bama. I dont think an SEC team will win the playoff for some time. Until they can find a qb at least. Bams and Eason would be scary. I could see him flipping there. -
SEC deserves the top 14 spots in the pole.
-
We don't give a fuck about stats. We only count natties (7 in a row). Stats are for loser Pac-12 fans to try and justify why their conference hasn't produced a winner besides USC for over 25 years. Stats are for those who go 7-6 in the PAC and want to win the SRS natty.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.
-
You might have a point if pretty much every other team didn't have an equally shitty schedule. Dreckfest.
-
I do agree that the B1G should have 2 if MSU beats Iowa. Ohio State could win it all
Bama is the clear #1 seed. Then Ohio State. Then Michigan State and rap it with Oklahoma who I told tequila weeks ago would run his little shithole Baylor, TCU and Okie State teams.
Ole Miss is a GOOD football team. Would win the Pac 12. -
And as always - doogs hate winners and nobody hates winners as much as puppy, king of the doogs
-
That's rich. Obscure stats are being used to prop up the SEC in this very thread.PurpleJ said:
We don't give a fuck about stats. We only count natties (7 in a row). Stats are for loser Pac-12 fans to try and justify why their conference hasn't produced a winner besides USC for over 25 years. Stats are for those who go 7-6 in the PAC and want to win the SRS natty.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.
-
No they aren't. Bama is #2 and in the playoffs. Nothing else mattersFire_Marshall_Bill said:
That's rich. Obscure stats are being used to prop up the SEC in this very thread.PurpleJ said:
We don't give a fuck about stats. We only count natties (7 in a row). Stats are for loser Pac-12 fans to try and justify why their conference hasn't produced a winner besides USC for over 25 years. Stats are for those who go 7-6 in the PAC and want to win the SRS natty.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.
-
el oh el. noRaceBannon said:
Ole Miss is a GOOD football team. Would win the Pac 12.
and you'd leave an undefeated Clemson out of the playoffs? -
I am boycotting Dr. Pepper until they invent and implement an 8 (or more) team playoff.
-
Yes. But they're losing this week anywayPostGameOrangeSlices said:
el oh el. noRaceBannon said:
Ole Miss is a GOOD football team. Would win the Pac 12.
and you'd leave an undefeated Clemson out of the playoffs? -
****No they aren't. Bama is #2 and in the playoffs. Nothing else matters****RaceBannon said:
That's rich. Obscure stats are being used to prop up the SEC in this very thread.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
We don't give a fuck about stats. We only count natties (7 in a row). Stats are for loser Pac-12 fans to try and justify why their conference hasn't produced a winner besides USC for over 25 years. Stats are for those who go 7-6 in the PAC and want to win the SRS natty.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.
Now Race forms a fake SEC-Alabama allegiance to get attention. Sorry dude, J already took that spot last year at this time. Maybe try the hated duck fan persona, you might find some action Race.
Its one thing to be a real southern, SEC fan who really believes in the bullshit and the conference. Its another thing to be a Warshintonion, born at Overlake Hospital in Bellevue, have a silver spoon rammed up your rectum your whole live, then become an SEC fan in the last year and pretend to dispute Puppy's accurate shit, with the intention of luring suckers in to boost your post total.
Game up Race. J's game was up a year ago. Dont fall into that horrible trap. Youre an ok wussy, just stick to what got you here.
J, your posts are so bad, the trolling for steelhead so obvious, I dont even respond anymore. This Is youre future if you dont wisup Race. -
I became a Bama fan when they hired Saban and we kept Ty
Hope this helps
7 straight -
****puppylove_sugarsteel said:
****No they aren't. Bama is #2 and in the playoffs. Nothing else mattersRaceBannon said:
That's rich. Obscure stats are being used to prop up the SEC in this very thread.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
We don't give a fuck about stats. We only count natties (7 in a row). Stats are for loser Pac-12 fans to try and justify why their conference hasn't produced a winner besides USC for over 25 years. Stats are for those who go 7-6 in the PAC and want to win the SRS natty.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.
Now Race forms a fake SEC-Alabama allegiance to get attention. Sorry dude, J already took that spot last year at this time. Maybe try the hated duck fan persona, you might find some action Race.
Its one thing to be a real southern, SEC fan who really believes in the bullshit and the conference. Its another thing to be a Warshintonion, born at Overlake Hospital in Bellevue, have a silver spoon rammed up your rectum your whole live, then become an SEC fan in the last year and pretend to dispute Puppy's accurate shit, with the intention of luring suckers in to boost your post total.
Game up Race. J's game was up a year ago. Dont fall into that horrible trap. Youre an ok wussy, just stick to what got you here.
J, your posts are so bad, the trolling for steelhead so obvious, I dont even respond anymore. This Is youre future if you dont wisup Race.
Puppy good at everything. -
How many handles does puppy have?
-
-
Roll Tide
-
Um, hey, that gig's taken.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
****No they aren't. Bama is #2 and in the playoffs. Nothing else matters****RaceBannon said:
That's rich. Obscure stats are being used to prop up the SEC in this very thread.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
We don't give a fuck about stats. We only count natties (7 in a row). Stats are for loser Pac-12 fans to try and justify why their conference hasn't produced a winner besides USC for over 25 years. Stats are for those who go 7-6 in the PAC and want to win the SRS natty.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.
Now Race forms a fake SEC-Alabama allegiance to get attention. Sorry dude, J already took that spot last year at this time. Maybe try the hated duck fan persona, you might find some action Race.
Its one thing to be a real southern, SEC fan who really believes in the bullshit and the conference. Its another thing to be a Warshintonion, born at Overlake Hospital in Bellevue, have a silver spoon rammed up your rectum your whole live, then become an SEC fan in the last year and pretend to dispute Puppy's accurate shit, with the intention of luring suckers in to boost your post total.
Game up Race. J's game was up a year ago. Dont fall into that horrible trap. Youre an ok wussy, just stick to what got you here.
J, your posts are so bad, the trolling for steelhead so obvious, I dont even respond anymore. This Is youre future if you dont wisup Race. -
It was cute the first time there was a post season where you actually had to prove your worth and the Pac-12 and Big Ten made it to the final.PurpleJ said:
We don't give a fuck about stats. We only count natties (7 in a row). Stats are for loser Pac-12 fans to try and justify why their conference hasn't produced a winner besides USC for over 25 years. Stats are for those who go 7-6 in the PAC and want to win the SRS natty.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.
-
Puppy has 4 handles,; dating back to 1997ish. Puppylove the first (kim banned) , Sugarlove, who fucking REAMED kims, fetters and field turfs ass fucking daily. Of course this is when Dawgman changed to a kindler gentler board.no_uh said:How many handles does puppy have?
Then came skookum (who some chump here poached) for a short while followed by Steelheader who broke the damn and got permaban. For the remaining 4 years years Ive had free membership on a buddies dime, which ive used to punk those folds of skin. (which got banned once a week for a day or two). I had a few more handlez as ive been banned so many times, but those are the big ones
Now I dont post at all. After I told fetters in may Browning was going to start, sterlheader2 and I said Gaskin was going to start and I broke Kim's heart that Linda was horrible and would never again throw a pass for UW, Steel2 pulled plug.
There's the story. Oh and only 1 handle here ladies
whats sad is all you dildo's here still pay KimmyKakes for a membership, then come here and make fun of others for doing so . -
It's all bullshit. Who the fuck here would bet against Ohio State kicking anyones ass if this was a 8 team playoff, with Barrett settled in at Qb? Ezekiel Elliott, is a man
-
I got tOSU beating anybody in playoff, except maybe Oklahoma. Its definitely "all bullshit" EaSe. The only team Bama could beat is Clemson, who let Dalvin Cook loose, but stood him down in second half. When Clemson stands Henry down in 2nd half, its highly unlikely Coker could beat Clemson (like fsu's great white hope couldnt)
-
OK fine, in five other threads they areRaceBannon said:
No they aren't. Bama is #2 and in the playoffs. Nothing else mattersFire_Marshall_Bill said:
That's rich. Obscure stats are being used to prop up the SEC in this very thread.PurpleJ said:
We don't give a fuck about stats. We only count natties (7 in a row). Stats are for loser Pac-12 fans to try and justify why their conference hasn't produced a winner besides USC for over 25 years. Stats are for those who go 7-6 in the PAC and want to win the SRS natty.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.
-
-
Bammer lost to Oklahomo in the Sugar Bowl because they didn't care...about the fucking Sugar Bowl...oh yeah, and they lost to Utah in the Sugar Bowl...they just didn't care....as ridiculous as saying a Pac 12 team didn't care about the Rose Bowl...
-
Puppy was sucking Ty's cock.RaceBannon said:I became a Bama fan when they hired Saban and we kept Ty
Hope this helps
7 straight
A coach needs 5 years, minimum. Right Pup??? -
in the end whether or not they cared doesn't affect the outcome of the game, so all wins and losses should and are treated equally, but that had to be a tough game for bama to get up for after missing out on potentially threepeating in the last game of the sunday because someone returned a missed FG 109 yards with no time left. Same thing with 2008, as they went into the SEC CG undefeated.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Bammer lost to Oklahomo in the Sugar Bowl because they didn't care...about the fucking Sugar Bowl...oh yeah, and they lost to Utah in the Sugar Bowl...they just didn't care....as ridiculous as saying a Pac 12 team didn't care about the Rose Bowl...
That's not to say it should matter in judging them though
