ESECPN in full spin mode...
Comments
-
Stanford plays the Pac 12 northEwaDawg said:
Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?RaceBannon said:
Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.RaceBannon said:
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU
Five road games is easier than four road games?
Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?
NO. NO. and NO.
Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).
Hope this helps -
FYFMFE. You quoted before I could change the SEC miss # to 5. Ole miss can't play themselves or I should've said three for the PAC.RaceBannon said:
Stanford plays the Pac 12 northEwaDawg said:
Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?RaceBannon said:
Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.RaceBannon said:
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU
Five road games is easier than four road games?
Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?
NO. NO. and NO.
Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).
Hope this helps
I understood, when I posted, that you were under the totally mistaken impression that the SEC is better than the P12. Repeating untruths does not make false statements true.
Sagarin agrees that Stanford's schedule is tougher than Ole Misses (sic).
Good luck with that aids thingy.
-
2013 wants your world order view of College Football back. Bama got trucked by a BIG team last year and isn't near as good as they were then, this year. And fucking Miss is not winning the Pac 12 this year. While the Pac 12 lacked a dominant team this year, it featured 9 teams that could beat top 15 team any week. Unlike the SEC who's former power schools such as Auburn, Tenn, Georgia, Missouri all made it possible for a team like Florida, who cant score on air to not only be in the SEC title game but also be somehow in the natty picture. Bama may deserve to squeak in as a 4 seed if they can some how muster to score the 13 pts needed it will take to beat Florida. But that isn't based on merit, it's based on reputation this year.RaceBannon said:I do agree that the B1G should have 2 if MSU beats Iowa. Ohio State could win it all
Bama is the clear #1 seed. Then Ohio State. Then Michigan State and rap it with Oklahoma who I told tequila weeks ago would run his little shithole Baylor, TCU and Okie State teams.
Ole Miss is a GOOD football team. Would win the Pac 12.
To say this isn't a huge dropoff year for the SEC trumps even Doog logic. -
Puppy good at everything.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
****puppylove_sugarsteel said:
****No they aren't. Bama is #2 and in the playoffs. Nothing else mattersRaceBannon said:
That's rich. Obscure stats are being used to prop up the SEC in this very thread.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
We don't give a fuck about stats. We only count natties (7 in a row). Stats are for loser Pac-12 fans to try and justify why their conference hasn't produced a winner besides USC for over 25 years. Stats are for those who go 7-6 in the PAC and want to win the SRS natty.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.
Now Race forms a fake SEC-Alabama allegiance to get attention. Sorry dude, J already took that spot last year at this time. Maybe try the hated duck fan persona, you might find some action Race.
Its one thing to be a real southern, SEC fan who really believes in the bullshit and the conference. Its another thing to be a Warshintonion, born at Overlake Hospital in Bellevue, have a silver spoon rammed up your rectum your whole live, then become an SEC fan in the last year and pretend to dispute Puppy's accurate shit, with the intention of luring suckers in to boost your post total.
Game up Race. J's game was up a year ago. Dont fall into that horrible trap. Youre an ok wussy, just stick to what got you here.
J, your posts are so bad, the trolling for steelhead so obvious, I dont even respond anymore. This Is youre future if you dont wisup Race.
Race can always hang on to the old tired "logic" that is, "If neither USC nor UW wins the Pac 12, it was a shitty year for the conference. -
And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.RaceBannon said:
Stanford plays the Pac 12 northEwaDawg said:
Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?RaceBannon said:
Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.RaceBannon said:
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU
Five road games is easier than four road games?
Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?
NO. NO. and NO.
Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).
Hope this helps
The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who. -
Your string of repeating everything that everyone else said in this thread while misquoting me was going along quite nicely until this piece of shit post.salemcoog said:
And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.RaceBannon said:
Stanford plays the Pac 12 northEwaDawg said:
Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?RaceBannon said:
Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.RaceBannon said:
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU
Five road games is easier than four road games?
Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?
NO. NO. and NO.
Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).
Hope this helps
The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.
Coogs gonna doog -
Oh so you weren't fluffing SC earlier in this thread?RaceBannon said:
Your string of repeating everything that everyone else said in this thread while misquoting me was going along quite nicely until this piece of shit post.salemcoog said:
And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.RaceBannon said:
Stanford plays the Pac 12 northEwaDawg said:
Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?RaceBannon said:
Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.RaceBannon said:
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU
Five road games is easier than four road games?
Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?
NO. NO. and NO.
Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).
Hope this helps
The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.
Coogs gonna doog
Today, Racebannon, you are the fucking King of Doog Island -
The "You're a loser Doog if you don't buy into the SEC hype" is a big deflection. If you're losing an argument, name call.
I don't hate Florida St or Ohio St because they won anything. -
race got fucking destroyed on this, sorry pal
-
Has any Pac 12 team beat the top SEC when it mattered other than USC? Has any Pac 12 team won a national title since 1991 other than USC? Coogs hate facts. But love to fluffsalemcoog said:
Oh so you weren't fluffing SC earlier in this thread?RaceBannon said:
Your string of repeating everything that everyone else said in this thread while misquoting me was going along quite nicely until this piece of shit post.salemcoog said:
And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.RaceBannon said:
Stanford plays the Pac 12 northEwaDawg said:
Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?RaceBannon said:
Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.RaceBannon said:
Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SECRoadDawg55 said:
UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.RaceBannon said:We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.
The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.
I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.
The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.
That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs
Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.
They barely survived WSU
Five road games is easier than four road games?
Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?
NO. NO. and NO.
Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).
Hope this helps
The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.
Coogs gonna doog
Today, Racebannon, you are the fucking King of Doog Island
Go figure
