Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This weeks committee head scratcher...

13»

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    #MyIrish
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,910 Swaye's Wigwam
    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    Not only does Pup have a fake account, but he uses a third account to upvote his primary fake.

    If we're gonna bash upvoting your own alts with your other alts, I'm out!
    AGREE
    PGOS wtf vote speaks volumes.
    The wtf was for being a looser with 10 handles, before I saw Troll Toll and changed it to an awesome
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,910 Swaye's Wigwam
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    dnc said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    Alabama should be #1. They are #1 in SRS, the most objective measure. They'd beat all but a few teams rather easily.

    This will look like my anti-SECness coming out, because it is, but why are they ahead of all these undefeated teams in SRS? Wins and losses are the most important factor.

    Sure, they probably beat Iowa by 10 on a neutral field, but Iowa hasn't lost.
    SRS attempts to measure how good a team is, not who has the best record. We all understand it's different intuitively (which is why no one would bat an eyelash when Bama comes out -10 versus an undefeated Iowa in that hypothetical matchup), but for some reason CFB fans cling to this outdated idea that the best way to measure teams is who has the least losses.

    Bama would be favored against anyone in the country, because they have the best team. In this case, SRS >>>> playoff committee >>>> poles.
    I get that, but college football doesn't have a lot of games, and people will always cling to wins and losses with records like 12-1 and 13-0, and rightfully so. Imagine if the NFL went to SRS or a mathematical formula for its playoff system. It wouldn't sit well.

    Ole Miss isn't a great team. Alabama should've taken care of business at home.
    At this point, Utah's loss at USC looks better than Bama's home loss to Ole Miss
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    Not only does Pup have a fake account, but he uses a third account to upvote his primary fake.

    Pup doesnt hang around this craptrap like you fags. upvoting himself is hardly his style. 1 handle is all I need to make you pillow chewers look foolish and fucktarded as you are. Enough with that shit. Derek? I got a cred to protect!!
    Very hurtful language.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,530
    One win over LSU >>>>>> 11 wins against temple and navy. hth
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    greenblood said:

    One win over LSU >>>>>> 11 wins against temple and navy. hth

    LSU cant complete a forward pass, neither can Saban. Pac12 teams are balanced, with efficient defenses. Bama gave up 80pts and 600yds to ole miss. All need be said.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    greenblood said:

    One win over LSU >>>>>> 11 wins against temple and navy. hth

    LSU cant complete a forward pass, neither can Saban. Pac12 teams are balanced, with efficient defenses. Bama gave up 80pts and 600yds to ole miss. All need be said.
    You're mediocre at trolling, fuck o dear boobielips!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.