Bill I never said you took it up ass. You, Road, Derek and maybe Race the only ones I leave alone out of respect for your knowledge and time put in on these boards over the years. I remember Race, Derek back in the 90's on dawgman. Being I was the only one who knew anything about husky football back in mid 90's when dawgman spurned out of dawgtales, I know anyone who is anyone, and thus give respect to those few still here. Rest of you fuckterds are about as relevant as Lindquist. Puppy built dawgman, and laying foundation for HH one layer at a time. Donations for construction should be sent to derek @derekbooks.com
Shit response as usual. How many innocent people have you polluted with the hiv this month Tommy? Do you let your victims know at introduction or right before you hide the weenie?
'I see Stanford with senior kevin hogan as being the main competition" (for pac 12 title). One of you fucks posted something regarding my fondness of USC preseason. As said earlier I took UCLA to win south at the end, which still possible, along with USC. Specifically because I didnt trust Sark, not his talent. Who knew Sark was hopped up on controlled substances and Bookers during games. in case you didn't notice buttfucks, Sark's talent just beat the number 3 team in the country..
Nice attempt to lay out puppy to dry. In the end however my magicianry is as usual, right on the nuts .
BTW, 99% of you fuckerds questioned my prognostication without going out on a limb yourselves with anything. Its comedy to hear Purple and Tommy chiming in on the subject...those dudes cant name the starting corners, along with most of you slobbering fat-necked tards. Fer fucks sake 99% of you thought Lindy was starting (puppy the ONLY one to call Browning the starter since spring...steelheader2 was the only other.)
You crosseyed fucks should appreciate the fact I bless your crochet circle with my presence, when i periodically pop in. Which is becoming less frequent however as you lamebrains from dawgman are crawling over here with your peters between your hairless legs, spoiling the joint.
Rest free however, your lgbtq type is getting lots of support from government and now the school system. 4th graders can now choose what bathroom to take a shit in according to their sexual direction. Imagine if this PC movement was available back in your day J, Tommy. You could have sat down to pee without getting bullied. I digress. football isnt your bag, but now you can find friendship elsewhere in the form of support groups.
btw, senior qb's mean little, remember J?
Take this long-winded bullshit back to Kim's, right below meanderings. Holee fuckall u gots too much time on your soft manicured hands wanker
Puppy and Steel2 different posters. The 2 best posters around. We both go back to pre dawgman's day. Heckman and SW had us on speed dial. We covered husky football unlike any other. Which is why Samek begged for my talents way back in day (I of course declined. Took too much of my suckee fuckee time. Black bitches are demanding)
You fags cut your teeth with kim and fetters. No wonder why this board is a shit show and nobody knows what the hell theyre talking about.
Pretty sure PL_SS_FS that there many saying that Browning would be the starter in the Spring - pretty sure both Pepsi and I said as much.
Pretty sure also that Chest and I also said that Stanford would win the North when everybody was choking on the Duck shit
Puppy ONLY one who called browning. Was all over both sites. And Gaskin (Steel2 was in on Gaskin too). Didnt see you post anything about browning, cut the shit.
Pretty sure PL_SS_FS that there many saying that Browning would be the starter in the Spring - pretty sure both Pepsi and I said as much.
Pretty sure also that Chest and I also said that Stanford would win the North when everybody was choking on the Duck shit
Puppy ONLY one who called browning. Was all over both sites. And Gaskin (Steel2 was in on Gaskin too). Didnt see you post anything about browning, cut the shit.
Pretty sure PL_SS_FS that there many saying that Browning would be the starter in the Spring - pretty sure both Pepsi and I said as much.
Pretty sure also that Chest and I also said that Stanford would win the North when everybody was choking on the Duck shit
Puppy ONLY one who called browning. Was all over both sites. And Gaskin (Steel2 was in on Gaskin too). Didnt see you post anything about browning, cut the shit.
Open main menu
Edit Watch this page Dissociative identity disorder "Split personality" redirects here. For other uses, see Split personality (disambiguation). Dissociative identity disorder Dissociative identity disorder.jpg An artist's interpretation of one person with multiple "dissociated personality states." Classification and external resources Specialty Psychiatry ICD-10 F44.8 ICD-9-CM 300.14 eMedicine article/916186 MeSH D009105 Dissociative identity disorder (DID), previously known as multiple personality disorder (MPD),[1] is a mental disorder on the dissociative spectrum characterized by the appearance of at least two distinct and relatively enduring identities or dissociated personality states that alternately control a person's behavior, accompanied by memory impairment for important information not explained by ordinary forgetfulness. These symptoms are not accounted for by substance abuse, seizures, other medical conditions, nor by imaginative play in children.[2] Diagnosis is often difficult as there is considerable comorbidity with other mental disorders. Malingering should be considered if there is possible financial or forensic gain, as well as factitious disorder if help-seeking behavior is prominent.[2][3][4][5]
DID is one of the most controversial psychiatric disorders, with no clear consensus on diagnostic criteria or treatment.[3] Research on treatment efficacy has been concerned primarily with clinical approaches and case studies. Dissociative symptoms range from common lapses in attention, becoming distracted by something else, and daydreaming, to pathological dissociative disorders.[6] No systematic, empirically-supported definition of "dissociation" exists.[7][8] It is not the same as schizophrenia.
Although neither epidemiological surveys nor longitudinal studies have been conducted, it is generally believed that DID rarely resolves spontaneously. Symptoms are said to vary over time.[6] In general, the prognosis is poor, especially for those with comorbid disorders. There are few systematic data on the prevalence of DID.[4] The International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation states that the prevalence is between 1 and 3% in the general population, and between 1 and 5% in inpatient groups in Europe and North America.[5] DID is diagnosed more frequently in North America than in the rest of the world, and is diagnosed three to nine times more often in females than in males.[4][7][9] The prevalence of DID diagnoses increased greatly in the latter half of the 20th century, along with the number of identities (often referred to as "alters") claimed by patients (increasing from an average of two or three to approximately 16).[7] DID is also controversial within the legal system,[3] where it has been used as a rarely successful form of the insanity defense.[10][11] The 1990s showed a parallel increase in the number of court cases involving the diagnosis.[12]
Dissociative disorders including DID have been attributed to disruptions in memory caused by trauma and other forms of stress, but research on this hypothesis has been characterized by poor methodology. So far, scientific studies, usually focusing on memory, have been few and the results have been inconclusive.[13] An alternative hypothesis for the etiology of DID is as a by-product of techniques employed by some therapists, especially those using hypnosis, and disagreement between the two positions is characterized by intense debate.[3][14] DID became a popular diagnosis in the 1970s, 80s and 90s, but it is unclear if the actual rate of the disorder increased, if it was more recognized by health care providers, or if sociocultural factors caused an increase in therapy-induced (iatrogenic) presentations. The unusual number of diagnoses after 1980, clustered around a small number of clinicians and the suggestibility characteristic of those with DID, support the hypothesis that DID is therapist-induced.[15] The unusual clustering of diagnoses has also been explained as due to a lack of awareness and training among clinicians to recognize cases of DID.[16]
Definitions
Signs and symptoms
Causes
Diagnosis
Pathophysiology
Treatment
Prognosis
Epidemiology
History
Society and culture
See also
Footnotes
External links
Read in another language Last edited 4 hours ago by Serols Wikipedia®® MobileDesktop Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Terms of UsePrivacy
Pretty sure PL_SS_FS that there many saying that Browning would be the starter in the Spring - pretty sure both Pepsi and I said as much.
Pretty sure also that Chest and I also said that Stanford would win the North when everybody was choking on the Duck shit
Puppy ONLY one who called browning. Was all over both sites. And Gaskin (Steel2 was in on Gaskin too). Didnt see you post anything about browning, cut the shit.
Comments
Pucker up sugar tits, I'm going in dry.
Pretty sure also that Chest and I also said that Stanford would win the North when everybody was choking on the Duck shit
The king doog has returned!
You fags cut your teeth with kim and fetters. No wonder why this board is a shit show and nobody knows what the hell theyre talking about.
Open main menu
Edit
Watch this page
Dissociative identity disorder
"Split personality" redirects here. For other uses, see Split personality (disambiguation).
Dissociative identity disorder
Dissociative identity disorder.jpg
An artist's interpretation of one person with multiple "dissociated personality states."
Classification and external resources
Specialty Psychiatry
ICD-10 F44.8
ICD-9-CM 300.14
eMedicine article/916186
MeSH D009105
Dissociative identity disorder (DID), previously known as multiple personality disorder (MPD),[1] is a mental disorder on the dissociative spectrum characterized by the appearance of at least two distinct and relatively enduring identities or dissociated personality states that alternately control a person's behavior, accompanied by memory impairment for important information not explained by ordinary forgetfulness. These symptoms are not accounted for by substance abuse, seizures, other medical conditions, nor by imaginative play in children.[2] Diagnosis is often difficult as there is considerable comorbidity with other mental disorders. Malingering should be considered if there is possible financial or forensic gain, as well as factitious disorder if help-seeking behavior is prominent.[2][3][4][5]
DID is one of the most controversial psychiatric disorders, with no clear consensus on diagnostic criteria or treatment.[3] Research on treatment efficacy has been concerned primarily with clinical approaches and case studies. Dissociative symptoms range from common lapses in attention, becoming distracted by something else, and daydreaming, to pathological dissociative disorders.[6] No systematic, empirically-supported definition of "dissociation" exists.[7][8] It is not the same as schizophrenia.
Although neither epidemiological surveys nor longitudinal studies have been conducted, it is generally believed that DID rarely resolves spontaneously. Symptoms are said to vary over time.[6] In general, the prognosis is poor, especially for those with comorbid disorders. There are few systematic data on the prevalence of DID.[4] The International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation states that the prevalence is between 1 and 3% in the general population, and between 1 and 5% in inpatient groups in Europe and North America.[5] DID is diagnosed more frequently in North America than in the rest of the world, and is diagnosed three to nine times more often in females than in males.[4][7][9] The prevalence of DID diagnoses increased greatly in the latter half of the 20th century, along with the number of identities (often referred to as "alters") claimed by patients (increasing from an average of two or three to approximately 16).[7] DID is also controversial within the legal system,[3] where it has been used as a rarely successful form of the insanity defense.[10][11] The 1990s showed a parallel increase in the number of court cases involving the diagnosis.[12]
Dissociative disorders including DID have been attributed to disruptions in memory caused by trauma and other forms of stress, but research on this hypothesis has been characterized by poor methodology. So far, scientific studies, usually focusing on memory, have been few and the results have been inconclusive.[13] An alternative hypothesis for the etiology of DID is as a by-product of techniques employed by some therapists, especially those using hypnosis, and disagreement between the two positions is characterized by intense debate.[3][14] DID became a popular diagnosis in the 1970s, 80s and 90s, but it is unclear if the actual rate of the disorder increased, if it was more recognized by health care providers, or if sociocultural factors caused an increase in therapy-induced (iatrogenic) presentations. The unusual number of diagnoses after 1980, clustered around a small number of clinicians and the suggestibility characteristic of those with DID, support the hypothesis that DID is therapist-induced.[15] The unusual clustering of diagnoses has also been explained as due to a lack of awareness and training among clinicians to recognize cases of DID.[16]
Definitions
Signs and symptoms
Causes
Diagnosis
Pathophysiology
Treatment
Prognosis
Epidemiology
History
Society and culture
See also
Footnotes
External links
Read in another language
Last edited 4 hours ago by Serols
Wikipedia®® MobileDesktop
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
Terms of UsePrivacy
Thanks puppy