Tequilla no hard feelings man. You were just so foolish in the other thread I had to google Tequilla, hardcorehusky, and Jonathan Smith. The thread I was trying I find was when @doogsinparadise said he didn't believe you when you said you were done with Smith. He was right.
It's not podcast on podcast crime. They are unpaid podcasts. Dennis is probably my favorite poster. Coker is right up there. I'm not really a talk radio or TBS guy, but it's as entertaining of a show that can be done on TBS and a perpetually mediocre football program.
You have excuses every time you are wrong. You are never wrong, just like Aubbie is meet wrong. I appreciate you even though I hate you as a poster and i question whether AuburnDawg is one of your two dads.
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off Alcatraz on the way home ...
If Petersen needs any more proof to fire this clown, the first half + first drive of the second half should have broke the camel's back ...
Enough said on that and this game ...
I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind
Fireable event? New most fucktarded post of young new year, maybe of all time. Congrats buttfuck!
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Next.
You probably think you made a point
Let me try again, old-timer. On average, the quality of opponents at the beginning of the year was on par with the quality of opponents at the end of the year.
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Next.
You probably think you made a point
Let me try again, old-timer. On average, the quality of opponents at the beginning of the year was on par with the quality of opponents at the end of the year.
Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off Alcatraz on the way home ...
If Petersen needs any more proof to fire this clown, the first half + first drive of the second half should have broke the camel's back ...
Enough said on that and this game ...
I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind
Fireable event? New most fucktarded post of young new year, maybe of all time. Congrats buttfuck!
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Next.
You probably think you made a point
Let me try again, old-timer. On average, the quality of opponents at the beginning of the year was on par with the quality of opponents at the end of the year.
Screw that. Win or GTFO. Fire Peterman today.
That's not true at all
You may not want it to be true, but the facts say otherwise.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off Alcatraz on the way home ...
If Petersen needs any more proof to fire this clown, the first half + first drive of the second half should have broke the camel's back ...
Enough said on that and this game ...
I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind
Fireable event? New most fucktarded post of young new year, maybe of all time. Congrats buttfuck!
I said that back in November ... get back to your meds
You have excuses every time you are wrong. You are never wrong, just like Aubbie is meet wrong. I appreciate you even though I hate you as a poster and i question whether AuburnDawg is one of your two dads.
I'm wrong plenty ... anybody that thinks that they are right all (or even a vast majority) of the time is full of shit.
Now, if I don't sit there and say "I'm wrong" enough for your liking ... then tough shit. And BTW, when I do say that I was wrong, or perhaps take new information and form a new opinion, I get hit with the "moving the goalposts" crap.
I learned a long time ago that regardless of what I say or do, for whatever reason people have some kind of opinion about it. There are people that are 100% in my corner and will do anything for me. There are other people that want to take shots at me any opportunity that they get. Such is life.
Glad that you appreciate the podcast ... we try to keep it light hearted and entertaining while balancing some amount of seriousness. Delicate balance.
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Next.
You probably think you made a point
Let me try again, old-timer. On average, the quality of opponents at the beginning of the year was on par with the quality of opponents at the end of the year.
Screw that. Win or GTFO. Fire Peterman today.
That's not true at all
You may not want it to be true, but the facts say otherwise.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
I like to equate 6 games (3 P12, 2 MW, 1 Big Sky) to 6 games (6 P12). I do that.
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Next.
You probably think you made a point
Let me try again, old-timer. On average, the quality of opponents at the beginning of the year was on par with the quality of opponents at the end of the year.
Screw that. Win or GTFO. Fire Peterman today.
That's not true at all
You may not want it to be true, but the facts say otherwise.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
I like to equate 6 games (3 P12, 2 MW, 1 Big Sky) to 6 games (6 P12). I do that.
I'm not exactly sure what you're implying here.
You would think that the offensive results should be better against 3 P12, 2 MW, and 1 Big Sky teams than against 6 P12 conference teams - agreed?
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Next.
You probably think you made a point
Let me try again, old-timer. On average, the quality of opponents at the beginning of the year was on par with the quality of opponents at the end of the year.
Screw that. Win or GTFO. Fire Peterman today.
That's not true at all
You may not want it to be true, but the facts say otherwise.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
I like to equate 6 games (3 P12, 2 MW, 1 Big Sky) to 6 games (6 P12). I do that.
That's kind of the point. The offense sucked in the 1st 6 games, but was substantially better the last 6 games.
@Tequilla Oct 2015 - "I've been saying for a while that Smith (and Pease) should be fired at end of season ... failure to do so by Petersen puts it on him and would be a fireable event in my mind"
@Tequilla Feb 2016 - "But I don't think it is indefensible to give Smith another crack with a more experienced team and not risk setting back some still young players with a new playbook and system in Year #2."
I like to say that Petersen should be fired if he doesnt get rid of Smith and then say its not indefensible to give Smith another season... that is what I like to do.
What changed? Other than the 2nd half of the season, nothing. But changing opinion based on demonstrated improvement in performanceplaying worse teams is an executable offense.
FTFY
"Tie a cement rock to the foot and throw him off [Smith] Alcatraz on the way home" to "Smith did just enough" because UW beat up on some of the worst defensive teams in the country to finish out the season.
You act like it was a surprise UW finished out the season against WSU, OSU, and some shit tier bowl team.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Next.
You probably think you made a point
Let me try again, old-timer. On average, the quality of opponents at the beginning of the year was on par with the quality of opponents at the end of the year.
Screw that. Win or GTFO. Fire Peterman today.
That's not true at all
You may not want it to be true, but the facts say otherwise.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35 Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
I like to equate 6 games (3 P12, 2 MW, 1 Big Sky) to 6 games (6 P12). I do that.
I'm not exactly sure what you're implying here.
You would think that the offensive results should be better against 3 P12, 2 MW, and 1 Big Sky teams than against 6 P12 conference teams - agreed?
I'm implying that bisecting the season and comparing opponent's records is not a good indicator of the schedule getting easier or harder. That's because these 6 games vs 6 games is not a good comparison.
The point AZHusky is trying to make is that the schedule did not get easier at the end of the season because the opponent's records are nearly identical.
How about we divide the conference schedule into thirds?
Comments
It's not podcast on podcast crime. They are unpaid podcasts. Dennis is probably my favorite poster. Coker is right up there. I'm not really a talk radio or TBS guy, but it's as entertaining of a show that can be done on TBS and a perpetually mediocre football program.
You have excuses every time you are wrong. You are never wrong, just like Aubbie is meet wrong. I appreciate you even though I hate you as a poster and i question whether AuburnDawg is one of your two dads.
Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Next.
Screw that. Win or GTFO. Fire Peterman today.
First 6 games, opponents record 42-35
Last 6 games, opponents record 43-35
Now, if I don't sit there and say "I'm wrong" enough for your liking ... then tough shit. And BTW, when I do say that I was wrong, or perhaps take new information and form a new opinion, I get hit with the "moving the goalposts" crap.
I learned a long time ago that regardless of what I say or do, for whatever reason people have some kind of opinion about it. There are people that are 100% in my corner and will do anything for me. There are other people that want to take shots at me any opportunity that they get. Such is life.
Glad that you appreciate the podcast ... we try to keep it light hearted and entertaining while balancing some amount of seriousness. Delicate balance.
You would think that the offensive results should be better against 3 P12, 2 MW, and 1 Big Sky teams than against 6 P12 conference teams - agreed?
The point AZHusky is trying to make is that the schedule did not get easier at the end of the season because the opponent's records are nearly identical.
How about we divide the conference schedule into thirds?
First (Cal, USC, Oregon)
Opp record 25-15
UW 1-2
Second (Stan, AZ, Utah)
Opp record 29-11
UW 1-2
Third (ASU, OSU, WSU)
Opp record 17-21
UW 2-1