Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Watching Clemson and Baylor pour on points

2»

Comments

  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited October 2015

    Fuck Kellen Moore.

    image

    If Cam Newton was a high school QB at Skyline, Petersen would probably hesitate to offer because he's a primadonna, has an entourage, and a helicopter dad.
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,698 Founders Club

    Fuck Kellen Moore.

    image

    If Cam Newton was a high school QB at Skyline, Petersen would probably hesitate to offer because he's a primadonna, an entourage, and a helicopter dad.
    In short, Cam is not an OKG. Got it!
  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,797
    Stated simply, Peterman and staff inherited a roster that had zero viable QBs, zero viable OLs, and only one viable WR (Ross, who's out for the year).

    If you expect to win anything with this shitshow, you're a fucking moron.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    It has very little to do with this thread, but I was watching Martavius Bryant on the Steelers dominate the other week. I went and looked up where he played in college and it was Clemson. Same team as Sammy Watkins and DeAndre Hopkins. They honestly might be the best WR corps of all time in college football.

    Those 3 tore Urban Meyer and Ohio State to shreds in the 2014 Orange bowel. Watkins especially.
    Yeah Watkins was ridiculous to watch in college.

    Crazy that he is likely going to end up the least successful of the three in the NFL.
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,588
    Charles and Riva were viable OL but both had to retire due to multiple injuries.

    As you said, Ross is out for the year. Mickens is ok but that's about it. Every other WR who is playing outside of Hall (Pettis, Lenius, Renfro, Chico) are true frosh or 2nd year guys who weren't able to RS.

    You are definitely right about the QBs. Troy Williams may end up being pretty good at Utah but he was a better fit for Rip It Brah's O rather than a modified Joe Gibbs type offense.

    Sarkisian forgot to recruit the OL from 2011-2013 so yeah, our best option at LT is a true frosh (Trey Adams) who was abused by a top 20 NFL pick last week (DeForrest Buckner) and that doesn't make a true frosh QB settle in and feel comfortable.

    No matter who the OC is next year, there will be no reason why they can't put up at least 5 more points per game. Only starters that are gone will be just Tufunga, Perkins, and Mickens....all easily replaceable.

    But after the Stanford game, the schedule gets a lot easier (outside of Utah but that's at home) so shouldn't we expect the O to put up at least points in the mid 20 range as the O gets more experienced? If Browning is healthy and plays, I see them scoring around 20 points against Stanford but Arizona's D sucks so anything less than 26-28 points would be tough to swallow.
    TTJ said:

    Stated simply, Peterman and staff inherited a roster that had zero viable QBs, zero viable OLs, and only one viable WR (Ross, who's out for the year).

    If you expect to win anything with this shitshow, you're a fucking moron.

  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    HFNY said:

    Charles and Riva were viable OL but both had to retire due to multiple injuries.

    As you said, Ross is out for the year. Mickens is ok but that's about it. Every other WR who is playing outside of Hall (Pettis, Lenius, Renfro, Chico) are true frosh or 2nd year guys who weren't able to RS.

    You are definitely right about the QBs. Troy Williams may end up being pretty good at Utah but he was a better fit for Rip It Brah's O rather than a modified Joe Gibbs type offense.

    Sarkisian forgot to recruit the OL from 2011-2013 so yeah, our best option at LT is a true frosh (Trey Adams) who was abused by a top 20 NFL pick last week (DeForrest Buckner) and that doesn't make a true frosh QB settle in and feel comfortable.

    No matter who the OC is next year, there will be no reason why they can't put up at least 5 more points per game. Only starters that are gone will be just Tufunga, Perkins, and Mickens....all easily replaceable.

    But after the Stanford game, the schedule gets a lot easier (outside of Utah but that's at home) so shouldn't we expect the O to put up at least points in the mid 20 range as the O gets more experienced? If Browning is healthy and plays, I see them scoring around 20 points against Stanford but Arizona's D sucks so anything less than 26-28 points would be tough to swallow.

    TTJ said:

    Stated simply, Peterman and staff inherited a roster that had zero viable QBs, zero viable OLs, and only one viable WR (Ross, who's out for the year).

    If you expect to win anything with this shitshow, you're a fucking moron.

    Can't expect to win w/o John Ross.
Sign In or Register to comment.