Real Talk
Comments
-
I'm just the massinger. Still expecting 7-5, maybe 8-4, in what is supposed to be Our Year of Opportunity. Flabbergasted! that anybody who is even remotely fuckingly paying attention would poont to Cal as seeing progress from its coaching changes.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Awfully warm out for December.BearsWiin said:
http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/92479/pac-12-bowl-projections-utah-to-the-college-football-playoff2001400ex said:
Like Tedford?topdawgnc said:I want to know why schools like Stanford and Kal can make coaching changes and actually start to see progress.
Every fucking year it is the same shit with UW.
Cal to the Rose Bowl
Our Boors haven't beaten anyone yet. -
Michigan returned 17 starters from a 5-7 team last year. It is a very experienced team that has recruited better than UW in recent years. They are getting better with each game. UW should look like that next season. Problem is Petersen's dreck offense (worst in the conference last year in all the advanced stats and worst again so far this year) is an impediment to that. He needs to bring in a real OC and turn the offense over.
-
UW should have improved for 14 years in a row.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Michigan returned 17 starters from a 5-7 team last year. It is a very experienced team that has recruited better than UW in recent years. They are getting better with each game. UW should look like that next season. Problem is Petersen's dreck offense (worst in the conference last year in all the advanced stats and worst again so far this year) is an impediment to that. He needs to bring in a real OC and turn the offense over.
How about they actually do it before we pop off? -
Michigan was worse than Washington last year, so of course they should be better than Washington this year with a terrible transfer qb from Iowa? Huh?
-
-
Time to register BoorHalfBrains.com. Ground floor opportunity!BearsWiin said:
I'm just the massinger. Still expecting 7-5, maybe 8-4, in what is supposed to be Our Year of Opportunity. Flabbergasted! that anybody who is even remotely fuckingly paying attention would poont to Cal as seeing progress from its coaching changes.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Awfully warm out for December.BearsWiin said:
http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/92479/pac-12-bowl-projections-utah-to-the-college-football-playoff2001400ex said:
Like Tedford?topdawgnc said:I want to know why schools like Stanford and Kal can make coaching changes and actually start to see progress.
Every fucking year it is the same shit with UW.
Cal to the Rose Bowl
Our Boors haven't beaten anyone yet. -
Might as well not play the games then.
-
It's taken Kal 4 (I think) years of Dykestopdawgnc said:I want to know why schools like Stanford and Kal can make coaching changes and actually start to see progress.
Every fucking year it is the same shit with UW. -
Michigan was barely worse than UW last year. They returned 17 starters. Most of their team is seniors. Throw in the new coach bounce and they'd win 7/8 games anyway. They probably finish 9-3.doogsinparadise said:Michigan was worse than Washington last year, so of course they should be better than Washington this year with a terrible transfer qb from Iowa? Huh?
UW is one of the least experienced, youngest teams in the country. 7/11 starters on offense are freshman or sophomores. The QB and 3/5 of the OL are freshman. Its a rebuilding year and if you can't admit that you should never post again. However, the offense which has been the worst in the league since Pete started should be criticized. With a half decent offense UW wins the north the next two years.
And Michigan will be worse next year. 18 of their 24 starters are seniors. Year 2 and 3 will be rebuilding time for Harbaugh. -
So you're telling us that Peterman underachieved last year then?HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Michigan was barely worse than UW last year. They returned 17 starters. Most of their team is seniors. Throw in the new coach bounce and they'd win 7/8 games anyway. They probably finish 9-3.doogsinparadise said:Michigan was worse than Washington last year, so of course they should be better than Washington this year with a terrible transfer qb from Iowa? Huh?
UW is one of the least experienced, youngest teams in the country. 7/11 starters on offense are freshman or sophomores. The QB and 3/5 of the OL are freshman. Its a rebuilding year and if you can't admit that you should never post again. However, the offense which has been the worst in the league since Pete started should be criticized. With a half decent offense UW wins the north the next two years.
And Michigan will be worse next year. 18 of their 24 starters are seniors. Year 2 and 3 will be rebuilding time for Harbaugh. -
Absolutely. It was a messy transition but he still underachieved.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
So you're telling us that Peterman underachieved last year then?HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Michigan was barely worse than UW last year. They returned 17 starters. Most of their team is seniors. Throw in the new coach bounce and they'd win 7/8 games anyway. They probably finish 9-3.doogsinparadise said:Michigan was worse than Washington last year, so of course they should be better than Washington this year with a terrible transfer qb from Iowa? Huh?
UW is one of the least experienced, youngest teams in the country. 7/11 starters on offense are freshman or sophomores. The QB and 3/5 of the OL are freshman. Its a rebuilding year and if you can't admit that you should never post again. However, the offense which has been the worst in the league since Pete started should be criticized. With a half decent offense UW wins the north the next two years.
And Michigan will be worse next year. 18 of their 24 starters are seniors. Year 2 and 3 will be rebuilding time for Harbaugh.
He's done a lot of good but his offense is holding the program back. If he can't improve that heading into next season then he will have failed overall. -
Waay past time to do that. Been a BoorHalfBrain in spirit since the 2009 game at Autzen.pawz said:
Time to register BoorHalfBrains.com. Ground floor opportunity!BearsWiin said:
I'm just the massinger. Still expecting 7-5, maybe 8-4, in what is supposed to be Our Year of Opportunity. Flabbergasted! that anybody who is even remotely fuckingly paying attention would poont to Cal as seeing progress from its coaching changes.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Awfully warm out for December.BearsWiin said:
http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/92479/pac-12-bowl-projections-utah-to-the-college-football-playoff2001400ex said:
Like Tedford?topdawgnc said:I want to know why schools like Stanford and Kal can make coaching changes and actually start to see progress.
Every fucking year it is the same shit with UW.
Cal to the Rose Bowl
Our Boors haven't beaten anyone yet. -
Why does Michigan automatically have a new coach bounce worth 2-3 wins, yet Petersen took UW backwards after taking over for a very mediocre coach? Petersen wouldn't lead this year's Michigan team to 9 wins. Rudock, Petersen, and Smith is a recipe for a dreckfest offense.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Michigan was barely worse than UW last year. They returned 17 starters. Most of their team is seniors. Throw in the new coach bounce and they'd win 7/8 games anyway. They probably finish 9-3.doogsinparadise said:Michigan was worse than Washington last year, so of course they should be better than Washington this year with a terrible transfer qb from Iowa? Huh?
UW is one of the least experienced, youngest teams in the country. 7/11 starters on offense are freshman or sophomores. The QB and 3/5 of the OL are freshman. Its a rebuilding year and if you can't admit that you should never post again. However, the offense which has been the worst in the league since Pete started should be criticized. With a half decent offense UW wins the north the next two years.
And Michigan will be worse next year. 18 of their 24 starters are seniors. Year 2 and 3 will be rebuilding time for Harbaugh. -
Year 3CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
It's taken Kal 4 (I think) years of Dykestopdawgnc said:I want to know why schools like Stanford and Kal can make coaching changes and actually start to see progress.
Every fucking year it is the same shit with UW.
1-11
5-7
Staring off 5-0 and ranked.
We're (?) fucked -
We're so fucking young! I've got all the screenshots I need from you on Harbaugh, I'll take the over next year.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Michigan was barely worse than UW last year. They returned 17 starters. Most of their team is seniors. Throw in the new coach bounce and they'd win 7/8 games anyway. They probably finish 9-3.doogsinparadise said:Michigan was worse than Washington last year, so of course they should be better than Washington this year with a terrible transfer qb from Iowa? Huh?
UW is one of the least experienced, youngest teams in the country. 7/11 starters on offense are freshman or sophomores. The QB and 3/5 of the OL are freshman. Its a rebuilding year and if you can't admit that you should never post again. However, the offense which has been the worst in the league since Pete started should be criticized. With a half decent offense UW wins the north the next two years.
And Michigan will be worse next year. 18 of their 24 starters are seniors. Year 2 and 3 will be rebuilding time for Harbaugh. -
CuntWaffle said:
Jesus fucking Christ. How many more of these long winded TSIO posts are going to happen by the end of the year?
"We" like the number seven -
Is 6-7 wins too much to ask in the shit PAC-9?
-
This year yes. But every other year no. 4 or 5 was my hope for this year.jecornel said:Is 6-7 wins too much to ask in the shit PAC-9?
-
Our?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Awfully warm out for December.BearsWiin said:
http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/92479/pac-12-bowl-projections-utah-to-the-college-football-playoff2001400ex said:
Like Tedford?topdawgnc said:I want to know why schools like Stanford and Kal can make coaching changes and actually start to see progress.
Every fucking year it is the same shit with UW.
Cal to the Rose Bowl
Our Boors haven't beaten anyone yet. -
Agree up to Michigan being worse next year. I get what you're saying regarding experience, but not really buying an automatic drop off because of it. Harbaugh has already changed the culture there, the younger players will develop very fast under him, that's been his MO. LIPO.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Michigan was barely worse than UW last year. They returned 17 starters. Most of their team is seniors. Throw in the new coach bounce and they'd win 7/8 games anyway. They probably finish 9-3.doogsinparadise said:Michigan was worse than Washington last year, so of course they should be better than Washington this year with a terrible transfer qb from Iowa? Huh?
UW is one of the least experienced, youngest teams in the country. 7/11 starters on offense are freshman or sophomores. The QB and 3/5 of the OL are freshman. Its a rebuilding year and if you can't admit that you should never post again. However, the offense which has been the worst in the league since Pete started should be criticized. With a half decent offense UW wins the north the next two years.
And Michigan will be worse next year. 18 of their 24 starters are seniors. Year 2 and 3 will be rebuilding time for Harbaugh.
