Husky Fan Podcast: Utah St Wrap Up, Cal Preview
Comments
-
How can we tell?droski said:
hate to break it to you, but this has been among the worst periods in cal football history too, so congrats for that. difference being Washington will never be relevant again ever. you guys need to learn a little about demographics.Gladstone said:
emerging from worst period in program history
6 in a row over you
Joe Kapp says hello -
you won because USC and UCLA and Oregon were down and james was roiding the shit out of your players. Doesn't seem very repeatable to me. There isn't a single power not located within driving distance of major talent. the days of Nebraska and Washington getting by by the major powers being down and steroids are long gone. sorry.Tequilla said:
What about these demographics? Are you beating your chest as a California superiority guy that suggests that there's no such thing as a good player developed anywhere outside of California?
Clearly you don't know much about UW football history because the program has historically been tied to recruiting the best in the State of Washington (7-12 recruits a year) combined with getting kids from California, Hawaii, and other Northwest states.
Unless you are saying that there's not going to be a population elsewhere than California, we'll be just fine. It's always been about whether or not we have had the right coach in place ... when we do, we win and win at a high level.
Don't you have another rugby national championship to go crow about anyway?
-
if your best example is from 35 years ago, I think I've made my point.RaceBannon said:
How can we tell?
Joe Kapp says hello -
the point is it is easier to pinpoint the few good years than to go over all the bad yearsdroski said:
if your best example is from 35 years ago, I think I've made my point.RaceBannon said:
How can we tell?
Joe Kapp says hello
Hope this helps
Cal sucks -
you have one more pac-12 championship historically than we do. congrats.RaceBannon said:
the point is it is easier to pinpoint the few good years than to go over all the bad years
Hope this helps
Cal sucks -
Either the Oregon part is a giant whoosh or you don't know what the fuck you're talking about ... either way, it's not interesting.droski said:
you won because USC and UCLA and Oregon were down and james was roiding the shit out of your players.Tequilla said:
What about these demographics? Are you beating your chest as a California superiority guy that suggests that there's no such thing as a good player developed anywhere outside of California?
Clearly you don't know much about UW football history because the program has historically been tied to recruiting the best in the State of Washington (7-12 recruits a year) combined with getting kids from California, Hawaii, and other Northwest states.
Unless you are saying that there's not going to be a population elsewhere than California, we'll be just fine. It's always been about whether or not we have had the right coach in place ... when we do, we win and win at a high level.
Don't you have another rugby national championship to go crow about anyway? -
Please dive off the Golden Gate Bridge asshater. Sanford reject trying to make Cal look bad?droski said:
you have one more pac-12 championship historically than we do. congrats.RaceBannon said:
the point is it is easier to pinpoint the few good years than to go over all the bad years
Hope this helps
Cal sucks -
The point is it was a period where you had almost zero competition recruiting wise. I don't think Oregon will be a power long term eitherTequilla said:
Either the Oregon part is a giant whoosh or you don't know what the fuck you're talking about ... either way, it's not interesting.droski said:
you won because USC and UCLA and Oregon were down and james was roiding the shit out of your players.Tequilla said:
What about these demographics? Are you beating your chest as a California superiority guy that suggests that there's no such thing as a good player developed anywhere outside of California?
Clearly you don't know much about UW football history because the program has historically been tied to recruiting the best in the State of Washington (7-12 recruits a year) combined with getting kids from California, Hawaii, and other Northwest states.
Unless you are saying that there's not going to be a population elsewhere than California, we'll be just fine. It's always been about whether or not we have had the right coach in place ... when we do, we win and win at a high level.
Don't you have another rugby national championship to go crow about anyway? -
SpoogeDawg said:
Please dive off the Golden Gate Bridge asshater. Sanford reject trying to make Cal look bad?droski said:
you have one more pac-12 championship historically than we do. congrats.RaceBannon said:
the point is it is easier to pinpoint the few good years than to go over all the bad years
Hope this helps
Cal sucks
I don't think for your sake that you want to start comparing academic credentials -
droski said:
you won because USC and UCLA and Oregon were down and james was roiding the shit out of your players. Doesn't seem very repeatable to me. There isn't a single power not located within driving distance of major talent. the days of Nebraska and Washington getting by by the major powers being down and steroids are long gone. sorry.Tequilla said:
What about these demographics? Are you beating your chest as a California superiority guy that suggests that there's no such thing as a good player developed anywhere outside of California?
Clearly you don't know much about UW football history because the program has historically been tied to recruiting the best in the State of Washington (7-12 recruits a year) combined with getting kids from California, Hawaii, and other Northwest states.
Unless you are saying that there's not going to be a population elsewhere than California, we'll be just fine. It's always been about whether or not we have had the right coach in place ... when we do, we win and win at a high level.
Don't you have another rugby national championship to go crow about anyway?
