ASJ suspended vs Boise
Comments
-
He_Needs_More_Time said:
Huh?LawDawg1 said:He_Needs_More_Time wrote:
I love how naive Doogs are and F3 pretending the injury was "made up". FleenorFS said they told him on Tuesday ASJ was good to go.
Completely agree. Then Fetters attempted to backtrack, using his smiley faces, and then says "if you read all 5 pages you'd know what I was talking about." Really? then why use quotation marks around "injury" being a "smokescreen" and why go to great extent to challenge the injury by saying he wasn't wearing anything in practice, got into stance without problem, etc. etc. Fetters, just say you made a fucking stoopid poast and move on. Don't try to fucking lie to us all and change the story when a fucking picture proves you're a dumbass.
I was agreeing with you fucktard. Fetters making shit up and attempting to backtrack on it is ridiculous. -
WHOOOOOOOSH! Damn some of you guys really need to take Derek's advice and lurk around here for a bit to get the hang of things.LawDawg1 said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
Huh?LawDawg1 said:He_Needs_More_Time wrote:
I love how naive Doogs are and F3 pretending the injury was "made up". FleenorFS said they told him on Tuesday ASJ was good to go.
Completely agree. Then Fetters attempted to backtrack, using his smiley faces, and then says "if you read all 5 pages you'd know what I was talking about." Really? then why use quotation marks around "injury" being a "smokescreen" and why go to great extent to challenge the injury by saying he wasn't wearing anything in practice, got into stance without problem, etc. etc. Fetters, just say you made a fucking stoopid poast and move on. Don't try to fucking lie to us all and change the story when a fucking picture proves you're a dumbass.
I was agreeing with you fucktard. Fetters making shit up and attempting to backtrack on it is ridiculous. -
He_Needs_More_Time said:
WHOOOOOOOSH! Damn some of you guys really need to take Derek's advice and lurk around here for a bit to get the hang of things.LawDawg1 said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
Huh?LawDawg1 said:He_Needs_More_Time wrote:
I love how naive Doogs are and F3 pretending the injury was "made up". FleenorFS said they told him on Tuesday ASJ was good to go.
Completely agree. Then Fetters attempted to backtrack, using his smiley faces, and then says "if you read all 5 pages you'd know what I was talking about." Really? then why use quotation marks around "injury" being a "smokescreen" and why go to great extent to challenge the injury by saying he wasn't wearing anything in practice, got into stance without problem, etc. etc. Fetters, just say you made a fucking stoopid poast and move on. Don't try to fucking lie to us all and change the story when a fucking picture proves you're a dumbass.
I was agreeing with you fucktard. Fetters making shit up and attempting to backtrack on it is ridiculous.
Wake up at the crack of dawn, stock the former Seahawk's coach irregardless of a fucking contract, hold a cake for his idiotic suprise birthday party in the middle of the street, then pop off...
-
A positive could come of this ASJ news. Maybe Sark will commit to pounding Sankey w the running game. Unlikely, but if I can't dream 1 day before opening game - when can I?
-
I would love that to be true, but I think we will see a lot of 4 WR sets. I doubt it would be much different with ASJ, as he would be in the slot half the game anyway. Sark will run an offense similar to how he normally does. Pretty balanced by the numbers, but skewed towards the pass when compared to other teams.Gladstone said:A positive could come of this ASJ news. Maybe Sark will commit to pounding Sankey w the running game. Unlikely, but if I can't dream 1 day before opening game - when can I?
-
Sark won't change his game plan at all. He has never once showed as a coach he can adjust to his personal(example: look how he handled Jake).RoadDawg55 said:
I would love that to be true, but I think we will see a lot of 4 WR sets. I doubt it would be much different with ASJ, as he would be in the slot half the game anyway. Sark will run an offense similar to how he normally does. Pretty balanced by the numbers, but skewed towards the pass when compared to other teams.Gladstone said:A positive could come of this ASJ news. Maybe Sark will commit to pounding Sankey w the running game. Unlikely, but if I can't dream 1 day before opening game - when can I?
Without ASJ he will now have more "freedom" to run those 4 and 5 WR sets. -
The decision was made on day 1. Sark knew from the beginning that he would create an excuse for why didn't have a better record... I mean to "strategically" make BSU plan for us with and without ASJ.dhdawg said:this decision should've been made ages ago
-
He made this decision last night when the dr ruled out ASJ. Why nothing is happening to Kasen because he is 100% healthy.Mad_Son said:
The decision was made on day 1. Sark knew from the beginning that he would create an excuse for why didn't have a better record... I mean to "strategically" make BSU plan for us with and without ASJ.dhdawg said:this decision should've been made ages ago
-
I have thought all along the decision was to not play ASJ.
Sark may not be a good football coach, but I think he's smart enough to know he has a pretty sweet gig and how to keep it. The absolute worst outcome for him tonight would have been to play ASJ, and to loose. Now that cannot happen. Win without ASJ and he's the greatest coach ever. Loose and it can be blamed on the suspension. Yesterday Doog Millen was already complaining about "politics" and "Sark has a boss". Loose to BSU because of the suspension, how can you be expected to focus ON THE ROAD against Illinois. Loose to Illinois because you cannot focus, then you cannot be expected to have a good season after starting 0-2, and Sark gets a mulligan, and 2014 becomes Year 2, 5.0. -
ASJ was ruled out only reason Sark made this move. If ASJ could physically play he'd be playing tonight.
Sark is a pussy and a bitch(abundance) on the way he mishandled this ASJ situation.




