Sark agrees with the decision to throw on the goal line in the Super Bowl. Shocker of the century.
Sark would have fucked up the clock management, too, just like the Seahawks did.
Sark would have called God's play. Then God would have spoken to Russell Wilson and told him to throw it to Lockette. The Russell Wilson would have told the press he threw the INT on purpose because God wanted him to throw the pick.
Sark agrees with the decision to throw on the goal line in the Super Bowl. Shocker of the century.
Sark would have fucked up the clock management, too, just like the Seahawks did.
Sark would have called God's play. Then God would have spoken to Russell Wilson and told him to throw it to Lockette. The Russell Wilson would have told the press he threw the INT on purpose because God wanted him to throw the pick.
That's right. God wanted the Seahawks to lose, so that they would use that as motivation to win it all in 2015. #stayhungry
During a live look in on a commercial break Sark said, "Jake may have been better on defense."
so Jake turns himself into a sure fire #1 overall draft pick with guaranteed $65M and Sark fucks him out of it and then has the gall to say he should have played defense?
During a live look in on a commercial break Sark said, "Jake may have been better on defense."
so Jake turns himself into a sure fire #1 overall draft pick with guaranteed $65M and Sark fucks him out of it and then has the gall to say he should have played defense?
I think Sark is saying Jake should've been the original 2-way threat. QB and SS on every down.
During a live look in on a commercial break Sark said, "Jake may have been better on defense."
so Jake turns himself into a sure fire #1 overall draft pick with guaranteed $65M and Sark fucks him out of it and then has the gall to say he should have played defense?
I think Sark is saying Jake should've been the original 2-way threat. QB and SS on every down.
I know you're being Sarkastic, but Jake was an outfielder not a shortstop.
looks like the LPT at dogturd.com locked the same thread after one comment... they get so sensitive when their beloved sarkaholic is critiqued. will keep any other OT thread going for years but a sark thread is either locked or moved to unleashed. fuck those guys.
This interview is an example of why the media will always love Sark. Outside of his team and the immediate issues he'll talk about anything, answer any question and he does it with honesty (quite honestly). He enjoys it and it makes the interviewer feel comfortable. The good reporters see through his BS but most others like Patrick, Herbstreit, Cowherd enjoy it.
His act is much different from those that hate dealing with the media like Saban, Chip and Pete to name a few.
This interview is an example of why the media will always love Sark. Outside of his team and the immediate issues he'll talk about anything, answer any question and he does it with honesty (quite honestly). He enjoys it and it makes the interviewer feel comfortable. The good reporters see through his BS but most others like Patrick, Herbstreit, Cowherd enjoy it.
His act is much different from those that hate dealing with the media like Saban, Chip and Pete to name a few.
Mike Leech has built a cottage industry and lifetime cash flow on this approach.
Quite honestly Dan, we were two plays away from the Pac 12 championship. Now that I've "FINISHED" my marriage vows, it's time for SC to let it rip in 2015.
Comments
His act is much different from those that hate dealing with the media like Saban, Chip and Pete to name a few.
Sark: "Probably Jim, I'd be looking to tap out". Said it a few times. Even if true, what a fucking pussy thing to say on NATTY TV/Radio.
I've heard the same question axed of Meyer and he said "no one could take me". And seemed furious it was even a question.
Speaks Volumes.
I'm ashamed to know that.