Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
9 Black People Gunned Down at Bible Study, Obvious Hate Crime
Comments
-
So you want a national ban on gunsAZDuck said:
C'mon Race, read the thread.RaceBannon said:guns are heavily regulated in Chicago and NYC for that matter
fuck the island. NOGAF
Guess how many firearm deaths in Chicago last month?
How many checkpoints are there between the Wisconsin or Indiana borders and Chicago?
zero-point-zero
#Blackieisright
These street gangs are getting their guns from Indiana? Along with gay wedding cakes?
Heavily regulated areas have high homicide rates.
Again - unless you want to be honest about what you want you're just playing to the low info voter. (hi Hondo!) -
Of course I think - that's why I said it and you now agree. The VC weren't re educated. You're pressing now.ThomasFremont said:
Ya think?RaceBannon said:
They are known for having small arms. They are a small people to begin with.ThomasFremont said:
The VC didn't win Vietnam with their small arms.RaceBannon said:
I'm a little disappointed that a fellow VC who spent time with me in the jungles of Cuba before we stormed the casinos would so easily down play even small weapons in the hands of anti government forces.ThomasFremont said:
While this sounds nice, the Revolution wasn't won because we got to the guns at Lexington or Ticonderoga (sure it helped). It was won because of the Atlantic Ocean, time, attrition, the sagging economy of a war weary England, and the French.Swaye said:
I like guns just fine. Use them to shoot deer every season since I was a boy with both Dads in a blind. But, this has much less to do with "loving" guns, and much more to do with believing in liberty, and the governments desire to restrict my ability to protect myself from that same government.allpurpleallgold said:The people arguing for guns always remind me of religious people. It's funny how all arguments sound the same when you've made up your mind first and come up with the argument second.
Just admit you love guns and that's all that matters.
It always amuses me that when you tell people (liberals mostly) you want guns to potentially defend yourself from jack booted government thugs, they look at you like you have two heads and are some kind of crazy domestic terrorist. Um, that is precisely what most of the guys on those bills we don't use anymore did. The redcoats were the ATF/FBI/whatever of their day. When what we now call patriots took up arms against them, because of a fundamental belief in liberty and self governance, they were committing domestic terrorism. Thank God they got to that arsenal in Lexington before the redcoats, or the revolution would have been over before it started. The limeys realized, correctly, they better steal the weapons first. The patriots realized, correctly, the only way to defend yourself in any meaningful way was to have them.
Do I think any of this happens in my lifetime? No, at least I certainly hope not. But, I believe in gun rights because I have no idea what might happen in a hundred years, and I want your great grandkids and any of my illegitimate grandkids to at least have to means to defend themselves and liberty from an overzealous government, or a common intruder, or a fucking Skynet activated robot army. Also, venison tastes good and everyone should shoot a deer and figure this out at least once in their life.
But if you want to oversimplify a major historical event into a single issue, that's your right!
Like the US in VietNam, the paper cuts added up to enough death to make the government back across the ocean say fuck it
We don't win the revolution without guns
HTH
The US crushed the NVA every time they met. Conventional battle went as well for the slopes as it did for the US rebels.
The VC used small arms and terror tactics to kill the will to fight. Too many US casualties for too little to gain
The VC still had their small arms when their northern "brothers" took over and "re-educated" all of them.
A whole lotta good their small arms did then.
We done here, or you want to keep going?
Remember, I was there
#FakeWarriors -
OZONE said:
I'm glad that nobody so far except Blackie thinks that people have the right to own anti aircraft weapons... as a flying boat owner... I don't want to have to worry about crazies shooting me down in a fit of rage.
It would be wrong to put a flying boat in this picture -
Yes they were. The VC were nationalists, not communists. The commies from Hanoi came in and took over after we left. They didn't compromise or share.RaceBannon said:
Of course I think - that's why I said it and you now agree. The VC weren't re educated. You're pressing now.ThomasFremont said:
Ya think?RaceBannon said:
They are known for having small arms. They are a small people to begin with.ThomasFremont said:
The VC didn't win Vietnam with their small arms.RaceBannon said:
I'm a little disappointed that a fellow VC who spent time with me in the jungles of Cuba before we stormed the casinos would so easily down play even small weapons in the hands of anti government forces.ThomasFremont said:
While this sounds nice, the Revolution wasn't won because we got to the guns at Lexington or Ticonderoga (sure it helped). It was won because of the Atlantic Ocean, time, attrition, the sagging economy of a war weary England, and the French.Swaye said:
I like guns just fine. Use them to shoot deer every season since I was a boy with both Dads in a blind. But, this has much less to do with "loving" guns, and much more to do with believing in liberty, and the governments desire to restrict my ability to protect myself from that same government.allpurpleallgold said:The people arguing for guns always remind me of religious people. It's funny how all arguments sound the same when you've made up your mind first and come up with the argument second.
Just admit you love guns and that's all that matters.
It always amuses me that when you tell people (liberals mostly) you want guns to potentially defend yourself from jack booted government thugs, they look at you like you have two heads and are some kind of crazy domestic terrorist. Um, that is precisely what most of the guys on those bills we don't use anymore did. The redcoats were the ATF/FBI/whatever of their day. When what we now call patriots took up arms against them, because of a fundamental belief in liberty and self governance, they were committing domestic terrorism. Thank God they got to that arsenal in Lexington before the redcoats, or the revolution would have been over before it started. The limeys realized, correctly, they better steal the weapons first. The patriots realized, correctly, the only way to defend yourself in any meaningful way was to have them.
Do I think any of this happens in my lifetime? No, at least I certainly hope not. But, I believe in gun rights because I have no idea what might happen in a hundred years, and I want your great grandkids and any of my illegitimate grandkids to at least have to means to defend themselves and liberty from an overzealous government, or a common intruder, or a fucking Skynet activated robot army. Also, venison tastes good and everyone should shoot a deer and figure this out at least once in their life.
But if you want to oversimplify a major historical event into a single issue, that's your right!
Like the US in VietNam, the paper cuts added up to enough death to make the government back across the ocean say fuck it
We don't win the revolution without guns
HTH
The US crushed the NVA every time they met. Conventional battle went as well for the slopes as it did for the US rebels.
The VC used small arms and terror tactics to kill the will to fight. Too many US casualties for too little to gain
The VC still had their small arms when their northern "brothers" took over and "re-educated" all of them.
A whole lotta good their small arms did then.
We done here, or you want to keep going?
Remember, I was there
#FakeWarriors
You're losing yourself in my wheelhouse.
Step away. -
ThomasFremont said:
Yes they were. The VC were nationalists, not communists. The commies from Hanoi came in and took over after we left. They didn't compromise or share.RaceBannon said:
Of course I think - that's why I said it and you now agree. The VC weren't re educated. You're pressing now.ThomasFremont said:
Ya think?RaceBannon said:
They are known for having small arms. They are a small people to begin with.ThomasFremont said:
The VC didn't win Vietnam with their small arms.RaceBannon said:
I'm a little disappointed that a fellow VC who spent time with me in the jungles of Cuba before we stormed the casinos would so easily down play even small weapons in the hands of anti government forces.ThomasFremont said:
While this sounds nice, the Revolution wasn't won because we got to the guns at Lexington or Ticonderoga (sure it helped). It was won because of the Atlantic Ocean, time, attrition, the sagging economy of a war weary England, and the French.Swaye said:
I like guns just fine. Use them to shoot deer every season since I was a boy with both Dads in a blind. But, this has much less to do with "loving" guns, and much more to do with believing in liberty, and the governments desire to restrict my ability to protect myself from that same government.allpurpleallgold said:The people arguing for guns always remind me of religious people. It's funny how all arguments sound the same when you've made up your mind first and come up with the argument second.
Just admit you love guns and that's all that matters.
It always amuses me that when you tell people (liberals mostly) you want guns to potentially defend yourself from jack booted government thugs, they look at you like you have two heads and are some kind of crazy domestic terrorist. Um, that is precisely what most of the guys on those bills we don't use anymore did. The redcoats were the ATF/FBI/whatever of their day. When what we now call patriots took up arms against them, because of a fundamental belief in liberty and self governance, they were committing domestic terrorism. Thank God they got to that arsenal in Lexington before the redcoats, or the revolution would have been over before it started. The limeys realized, correctly, they better steal the weapons first. The patriots realized, correctly, the only way to defend yourself in any meaningful way was to have them.
Do I think any of this happens in my lifetime? No, at least I certainly hope not. But, I believe in gun rights because I have no idea what might happen in a hundred years, and I want your great grandkids and any of my illegitimate grandkids to at least have to means to defend themselves and liberty from an overzealous government, or a common intruder, or a fucking Skynet activated robot army. Also, venison tastes good and everyone should shoot a deer and figure this out at least once in their life.
But if you want to oversimplify a major historical event into a single issue, that's your right!
Like the US in VietNam, the paper cuts added up to enough death to make the government back across the ocean say fuck it
We don't win the revolution without guns
HTH
The US crushed the NVA every time they met. Conventional battle went as well for the slopes as it did for the US rebels.
The VC used small arms and terror tactics to kill the will to fight. Too many US casualties for too little to gain
The VC still had their small arms when their northern "brothers" took over and "re-educated" all of them.
A whole lotta good their small arms did then.
We done here, or you want to keep going?
Remember, I was there
#FakeWarriors
You're losing yourself in my wheelhouse.
Step away.
-
You're wheelhouse is out of a book. While I wasn't there (really?) it was current events. The VC were nationalists. How cute.ThomasFremont said:
Yes they were. The VC were nationalists, not communists. The commies from Hanoi came in and took over after we left. They didn't compromise or share.RaceBannon said:
Of course I think - that's why I said it and you now agree. The VC weren't re educated. You're pressing now.ThomasFremont said:
Ya think?RaceBannon said:
They are known for having small arms. They are a small people to begin with.ThomasFremont said:
The VC didn't win Vietnam with their small arms.RaceBannon said:
I'm a little disappointed that a fellow VC who spent time with me in the jungles of Cuba before we stormed the casinos would so easily down play even small weapons in the hands of anti government forces.ThomasFremont said:
While this sounds nice, the Revolution wasn't won because we got to the guns at Lexington or Ticonderoga (sure it helped). It was won because of the Atlantic Ocean, time, attrition, the sagging economy of a war weary England, and the French.Swaye said:
I like guns just fine. Use them to shoot deer every season since I was a boy with both Dads in a blind. But, this has much less to do with "loving" guns, and much more to do with believing in liberty, and the governments desire to restrict my ability to protect myself from that same government.allpurpleallgold said:The people arguing for guns always remind me of religious people. It's funny how all arguments sound the same when you've made up your mind first and come up with the argument second.
Just admit you love guns and that's all that matters.
It always amuses me that when you tell people (liberals mostly) you want guns to potentially defend yourself from jack booted government thugs, they look at you like you have two heads and are some kind of crazy domestic terrorist. Um, that is precisely what most of the guys on those bills we don't use anymore did. The redcoats were the ATF/FBI/whatever of their day. When what we now call patriots took up arms against them, because of a fundamental belief in liberty and self governance, they were committing domestic terrorism. Thank God they got to that arsenal in Lexington before the redcoats, or the revolution would have been over before it started. The limeys realized, correctly, they better steal the weapons first. The patriots realized, correctly, the only way to defend yourself in any meaningful way was to have them.
Do I think any of this happens in my lifetime? No, at least I certainly hope not. But, I believe in gun rights because I have no idea what might happen in a hundred years, and I want your great grandkids and any of my illegitimate grandkids to at least have to means to defend themselves and liberty from an overzealous government, or a common intruder, or a fucking Skynet activated robot army. Also, venison tastes good and everyone should shoot a deer and figure this out at least once in their life.
But if you want to oversimplify a major historical event into a single issue, that's your right!
Like the US in VietNam, the paper cuts added up to enough death to make the government back across the ocean say fuck it
We don't win the revolution without guns
HTH
The US crushed the NVA every time they met. Conventional battle went as well for the slopes as it did for the US rebels.
The VC used small arms and terror tactics to kill the will to fight. Too many US casualties for too little to gain
The VC still had their small arms when their northern "brothers" took over and "re-educated" all of them.
A whole lotta good their small arms did then.
We done here, or you want to keep going?
Remember, I was there
#FakeWarriors
You're losing yourself in my wheelhouse.
Step away.
So was Ho. A nationalist commie.
Was is true in both Cuba and VN is that the new boss was well aware of the danger of individual gun ownership. Hence the disarming of the citizens.
Just like you commies want to do here!!!1111!!!! -
My books>>>>>your drum circles.RaceBannon said:
You're wheelhouse is out of a book. While I wasn't there (really?) it was current events. The VC were nationalists. How cute.ThomasFremont said:
Yes they were. The VC were nationalists, not communists. The commies from Hanoi came in and took over after we left. They didn't compromise or share.RaceBannon said:
Of course I think - that's why I said it and you now agree. The VC weren't re educated. You're pressing now.ThomasFremont said:
Ya think?RaceBannon said:
They are known for having small arms. They are a small people to begin with.ThomasFremont said:
The VC didn't win Vietnam with their small arms.RaceBannon said:
I'm a little disappointed that a fellow VC who spent time with me in the jungles of Cuba before we stormed the casinos would so easily down play even small weapons in the hands of anti government forces.ThomasFremont said:
While this sounds nice, the Revolution wasn't won because we got to the guns at Lexington or Ticonderoga (sure it helped). It was won because of the Atlantic Ocean, time, attrition, the sagging economy of a war weary England, and the French.Swaye said:
I like guns just fine. Use them to shoot deer every season since I was a boy with both Dads in a blind. But, this has much less to do with "loving" guns, and much more to do with believing in liberty, and the governments desire to restrict my ability to protect myself from that same government.allpurpleallgold said:The people arguing for guns always remind me of religious people. It's funny how all arguments sound the same when you've made up your mind first and come up with the argument second.
Just admit you love guns and that's all that matters.
It always amuses me that when you tell people (liberals mostly) you want guns to potentially defend yourself from jack booted government thugs, they look at you like you have two heads and are some kind of crazy domestic terrorist. Um, that is precisely what most of the guys on those bills we don't use anymore did. The redcoats were the ATF/FBI/whatever of their day. When what we now call patriots took up arms against them, because of a fundamental belief in liberty and self governance, they were committing domestic terrorism. Thank God they got to that arsenal in Lexington before the redcoats, or the revolution would have been over before it started. The limeys realized, correctly, they better steal the weapons first. The patriots realized, correctly, the only way to defend yourself in any meaningful way was to have them.
Do I think any of this happens in my lifetime? No, at least I certainly hope not. But, I believe in gun rights because I have no idea what might happen in a hundred years, and I want your great grandkids and any of my illegitimate grandkids to at least have to means to defend themselves and liberty from an overzealous government, or a common intruder, or a fucking Skynet activated robot army. Also, venison tastes good and everyone should shoot a deer and figure this out at least once in their life.
But if you want to oversimplify a major historical event into a single issue, that's your right!
Like the US in VietNam, the paper cuts added up to enough death to make the government back across the ocean say fuck it
We don't win the revolution without guns
HTH
The US crushed the NVA every time they met. Conventional battle went as well for the slopes as it did for the US rebels.
The VC used small arms and terror tactics to kill the will to fight. Too many US casualties for too little to gain
The VC still had their small arms when their northern "brothers" took over and "re-educated" all of them.
A whole lotta good their small arms did then.
We done here, or you want to keep going?
Remember, I was there
#FakeWarriors
You're losing yourself in my wheelhouse.
Step away.
So was Ho. A nationalist commie.
Was is true in both Cuba and VN is that the new boss was well aware of the danger of individual gun ownership. Hence the disarming of the citizens.
Just like you commies want to do here!!!1111!!!!
BTW, I never said I was against guns. I'm not. But you guys are abusing historical examples to support your position.
I will not abide that, dude. -
I won
-
Have you ever lost?RaceBannon said:I won
-
MelloDawg took him to school once.topdawgnc said:
Have you ever lost?RaceBannon said:I won
