Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What record would it take to get Sark canned?

135

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    I think 5-7 he'd be fired. I believe 6 to 7 wins he'd finally be on the "hot seat" and even though I don't know how hot it would be as long as he keeps taking the Huskies to crap bowl games I think the administration is happy.

    I also think if ticket sales are hurting I could see more pressure on Sark but sadly I think 7 wins he stays. I think 8 wins he gets an extension and 9 wins Doogs will start building their statue of him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    dnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Auburndawg said:

    What should happen:

    8-4. Not good enough. Must improve.
    7-6. Super hot seat. You get one more year.
    Anything less, fired.

    Unfortunately it would probably take 4-8 to get him fired

    I'd fire him for 8-5 or worse, extend him a couple years for 9-4, and wave goodbye to him for a better job while I got a better coach if he somehow pulled 10+ wins out of his ass.

    Of course, I'd have already fired him after the 2011 season and again after the 2012 season, because I care about football.

    The reality is that we're stuck hoping that Sark either fires himself or promotes himself out of the job. Until that happens, lather, rinse, repeat.
    There is no "better job" that's coming for him after one good season.
    There are plenty of fucktarded NFL teams and that would be our best bet.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CheersWestDawg
    CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,480 Swaye's Wigwam
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    dnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Auburndawg said:

    What should happen:

    8-4. Not good enough. Must improve.
    7-6. Super hot seat. You get one more year.
    Anything less, fired.

    Unfortunately it would probably take 4-8 to get him fired

    I'd fire him for 8-5 or worse, extend him a couple years for 9-4, and wave goodbye to him for a better job while I got a better coach if he somehow pulled 10+ wins out of his ass.

    Of course, I'd have already fired him after the 2011 season and again after the 2012 season, because I care about football.

    The reality is that we're stuck hoping that Sark either fires himself or promotes himself out of the job. Until that happens, lather, rinse, repeat.
    There is no "better job" that's coming for him after one good season.
    There are plenty of fucktarded NFL teams and that would be our best bet.
    There is only one team called the Buffalo Bills.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652
    RoadDawg55 said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    dnc said:

    4 and even Woodward would send Pool Boy (lol!) Door. Ass. Out.

    I agree with you that 5 saves his job.

    IMO, anything less than 8 should merit automatic termination, and 8 with more than one lana esirprus would be enough for me to pull the trigger.

    Anything less than 10 wins and I'll still be looking for our next coach.

    I'm surprised you think 5 wins and Sark will stay. I think he's out with a 6-6 regular season. 7-5 and he probably gets one more year.
    I hope you're right. I just don't see anything in the last decade and a half of Husky football that tells me 5 wins is a fireable offense. Now, if some Joey's waitress comes forward and says he grabbed her ass without her consent, he could win an NC and still be DAO.

    I guess that settles it. We are going to have to pay off a Joey's waitress. I may be putting too much stock in it, but Woodward in the Seattle Times chat made it pretty clear he expected improvement.

    If we are going with this ploy, we should take out Woodward too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,378 Standard Supporter
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    dnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Auburndawg said:

    What should happen:

    8-4. Not good enough. Must improve.
    7-6. Super hot seat. You get one more year.
    Anything less, fired.

    Unfortunately it would probably take 4-8 to get him fired

    I'd fire him for 8-5 or worse, extend him a couple years for 9-4, and wave goodbye to him for a better job while I got a better coach if he somehow pulled 10+ wins out of his ass.

    Of course, I'd have already fired him after the 2011 season and again after the 2012 season, because I care about football.

    The reality is that we're stuck hoping that Sark either fires himself or promotes himself out of the job. Until that happens, lather, rinse, repeat.
    There is no "better job" that's coming for him after one good season.
    There are plenty of fucktarded NFL teams and that would be our best bet.
    Raiders (Lame Kitten, Cable..Idaho coach and wife beater), Bills like CWD said. they haven't given a fuck about winning for 20 years, Browns, Jacksonville
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    CheersWestDawg said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    dnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Auburndawg said:

    What should happen:

    8-4. Not good enough. Must improve.
    7-6. Super hot seat. You get one more year.
    Anything less, fired.

    Unfortunately it would probably take 4-8 to get him fired

    I'd fire him for 8-5 or worse, extend him a couple years for 9-4, and wave goodbye to him for a better job while I got a better coach if he somehow pulled 10+ wins out of his ass.

    Of course, I'd have already fired him after the 2011 season and again after the 2012 season, because I care about football.

    The reality is that we're stuck hoping that Sark either fires himself or promotes himself out of the job. Until that happens, lather, rinse, repeat.
    There is no "better job" that's coming for him after one good season.
    There are plenty of fucktarded NFL teams and that would be our best bet.
    There is only one team called the Buffalo Bills.
    That was the fucktarded team I had in mind. Although Cleveland is pretty fucking stupid, so are the Jags, Titans, Jets, and Lions.

    Apologies to any of the other fucktarded teams I forgot to include.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Raiders (Lame Kitten, Cable..Idaho coach and wife beater), Bills like CWD said. they haven't given a fuck about winning for 20 years, Browns, Jacksonville

    Recall that the Raiders already offered the job to Seven once.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,378 Standard Supporter
    This topic has come up a few times but I know there are a lot of new posters. I actually think a 6-6 regular season gets him fired. 7-6 with a blowout bowel loss might get him fired too. Woodward isn't the studious, wannabe Ivy Leaguer who talks non-stop about the student athlete like Turner. He does actually care about winning a little. Also, 7-6 4 years in a row will piss the Redmans, Meads, and Crocketts off quite a bit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    How the fuck did I forget the Raiders?!! Christ.

    I think 7-6 gets him fired only if they fear a major decline in season tickets next season. I think if Woodward feels the fans have turned on Sark then he'll fire Sark.

    I think the pulse of the fans, big donors has some say in this. If they feel like retaining Sark won't hurt ticket prices I don't think it matters what his record is this year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468
    Al Davis is dead now, y'know
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter