Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stephanie Sarkisian selling the couch

123457

Comments

  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,546 Founders Club
    d2d said:

    PurpleBaze said:

    HuskyJW said:

    California...I think automatically get 50% and alimony and child support

    He will lose complete focus now....she was only person keeping him at least a little grounded

    You can't lose something that you don't already have.
    Wrong. An employment contract is property.
    I was referring to Sark's lack of FOCUS, which you also seem to possess.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    insinceredawg said:

    Kim has already quietly deleted the thread on the DM boards about this topic. The Sark love runs deep with him.

    Kim's only fucking questions to the kids when he interviews are:

    Tell me really WASN'T IT SO DIFFERENT BEFORE? THAT'S BEEN AN ADJUSTMENT HASN'T IT?

    He just constantly tries to stir up shit. It's fucking pathological. He loves Sark so much he can't even talk to a player on our current roster without mentioning something Sark related.
    And then when someone brings Sark up in a negative context, he blasts them for being immature and too sensitive.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    insinceredawg said:

    Kim has already quietly deleted the thread on the DM boards about this topic. The Sark love runs deep with him.

    Kim's only fucking questions to the kids when he interviews are:

    Tell me really WASN'T IT SO DIFFERENT BEFORE? THAT'S BEEN AN ADJUSTMENT HASN'T IT?

    He just constantly tries to stir up shit. It's fucking pathological. He loves Sark so much he can't even talk to a player on our current roster without mentioning something Sark related.
    I loved Darrell Daniels' response. You could tell he wasn't affected at all by the coaching change. It was pretty clear after a few seconds yet Kim asked him multiple times.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,151 Standard Supporter
    PurpleThrobber said:

    doogville said:

    Damn, sark must be feasting down in LA.

    PurpleJ said:

    Who ever catches Stephanie on the rebound is going to be one lucky man. Well worth the price of having Sark's sloppy seconds.

    Are you blind as well as such fag, J?

    That is one ugly (wo)man.
    PurpleThrobber said:

    doogville said:

    Damn, sark must be feasting down in LA.

    PurpleJ said:

    Who ever catches Stephanie on the rebound is going to be one lucky man. Well worth the price of having Sark's sloppy seconds.

    Are you blind as well as such fag, J?

    That is one ugly (wo)man.
    This. Infidelity is wrong, blah, blah, blah, but I get it. She isn't aging great.

    Leykis talked about how some dudes (Favre) were stuck with their high school and college sweethearts and how you could tell. It's not the deepest topic ever but if you're in to slaying L A. nines and tens, the divorce will make it easier.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,594
    If you have dawgman access and want to get infuriated, read Kim's comments in the "Petersen can't recruit myth" post
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sarkingham
    Sarkingham Member Posts: 303
    bananasnblondes said:

    If you have dawgman access and want to get infuriated, read Kim's comments in the "Petersen can't recruit myth" post

    Summary?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    bananasnblondes said:

    If you have dawgman access and want to get infuriated, read Kim's comments in the "Petersen can't recruit myth" post

    I bet it's a doozy!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter