How does Eklund have a job (kim goes without saying)
Comments
-
in other words, Dawgman fully endorses that Sark recruited the first 3-4 years for one style and after it didn't work, they're switching and thus none of the guys on the team are a good fit so we need to look for a special 2017.
-
If they had any balls, they would just say Laga isn't very good, which is the real reason why he won't play. Size wise, he's a protypical NT in a 3-4, so yeah, Eklund is full of shit, and keeps getting worse as time goes on.
On the other hand, why the fuck are you even listening to their show? It sucks, and you are well aware they don't know dick about football. -
I like how, according to Eklund, UW is "doing very well" for all the big name players on the west coast. However, all the big names who have not shown interest or committed elsewhere ate guys that "Sark doesn't want" or "don't fit Sark's system". About a week ago, a guy who Scott said "UW is doing VERY well with" released his top 8 schools. No UW. Apparently "doing very well" means Top 9 in recruiting
-
Yeah, I haven't checked dawgman in a little while, but when I did Eklund told some poster UW would be doing very well to make a guy's top 8. How the fuck is it lucky to make a top 8, and what good does that do?bananasnblondes said:I like how, according to Eklund, UW is "doing very well" for all the big name players on the west coast. However, all the big names who have not shown interest or committed elsewhere ate guys that "Sark doesn't want" or "don't fit Sark's system". About a week ago, a guy who Scott said "UW is doing VERY well with" released his top 8 schools. No UW. Apparently "doing very well" means Top 9 in recruiting
It's all useless information. I know there are some who subscribe to dawgman strictly because of the recruiting info, but you can get the same information (Often more accurate as well) from Twitter and other places.
-
Thanks for listening.
-
Yeah, that was Mamma (sp?), who a couple weeks earlier, SE/CF had been spouting that UW was doing "berry well with". But after UW didn't make the top 8, SE came on saying "I never thought UW had a shot".
Sad that the site has gone as far down the shitter as it has but......it helped to create this fine institution!....fmbananasnblondes said:I like how, according to Eklund, UW is "doing very well" for all the big name players on the west coast. However, all the big names who have not shown interest or committed elsewhere ate guys that "Sark doesn't want" or "don't fit Sark's system". About a week ago, a guy who Scott said "UW is doing VERY well with" released his top 8 schools. No UW. Apparently "doing very well" means Top 9 in recruiting
-
Stick to these type of posts instead of the SEC posts. This was a good and correct post.puppylove_sugarsteel said:on today's radio show Ektard stated that Lawrence Laga isnt going to play because he doesn't match the new body type that the Huskies staff is looking for. Bull fucking shit. If a Guy can stuff the run and get to the QB it doesn't material how much "length" you have. Guy's a fucking idiot. So the. dawgs wouldn't play Triplett because he was only 6 feet tall? Fuck that chimp. I'd love to pop his faggy ass right in the kisser. He's gay, listen to his voice. Has no business talking major college football. Frigging idiot
Also what the fuck does that even mean? New body type? Is Sark in his first year as head coach? He's been here five fucking years so we should know by now what "body type" we want.
Eklund has done a fine job in the past year or so to be on the same level as F3 and Kimmy. Those three are such a black eye to our program. -
Pop his Faggy ass in the kisser. Sounds homo erotic. Get it!!!puppylove_sugarsteel said:on today's radio show Ektard stated that Lawrence Laga isnt going to play because he doesn't match the new body type that the Huskies staff is looking for. Bull fucking shit. If a Guy can stuff the run and get to the QB it doesn't material how much "length" you have. Guy's a fucking idiot. So the. dawgs wouldn't play Triplett because he was only 6 feet tall? Fuck that chimp. I'd love to pop his faggy ass right in the kisser. He's gay, listen to his voice. Has no business talking major college football. Frigging idiot
-
Sark said on the radio as well they would have recruited differently had he known they were going to run the 3-4. SO he needs 4 more years to recruit the RIGHT defensive players.
Sounds like an excuse? -
Maybe if he had been thinking about UW instead of the USC rosebowl game he would have realized this a bit sooner. We're fucked.jecornel said:Sark said on the radio as well they would have recruited differently had he known they were going to run the 3-4. SO he needs 4 more years to recruit the RIGHT defensive players.
Sounds like an excuse?
I'm getting to the point that even if he goes 111-0 I want him gone. I can barely stand to look at him.





