Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Replacing Army in the Poinsettia Bowl is always special

2

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,943 Founders Club

    last time I checked it was top16. am I wrong? Would be only the second time ever and ill gladly stand corrected

    Both right...


    3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, or the Sun Belt Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

    A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

    B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

    Dumbest. Rule. Ever.

    Nobody gives a rat's ass about directional MAC schools, especially in major bowl games.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    last time I checked it was top16. am I wrong? Would be only the second time ever and ill gladly stand corrected

    Both right...


    3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, or the Sun Belt Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

    A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

    B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

    Dumbest. Rule. Ever.

    Nobody gives a rat's ass about directional MAC schools, especially in major bowl games.
    If the MAC champ is higher ranked than the AAC/ACC/Pac-12 champ, why shouldn't they get in?
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,943 Founders Club

    last time I checked it was top16. am I wrong? Would be only the second time ever and ill gladly stand corrected

    Both right...


    3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, or the Sun Belt Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

    A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

    B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

    Dumbest. Rule. Ever.

    Nobody gives a rat's ass about directional MAC schools, especially in major bowl games.
    If the MAC champ is higher ranked than the AAC/ACC/Pac-12 champ, why shouldn't they get in?
    A) Nine out of 10 times, the non-AQ team is overrated. Put a 10-2 or 11-1 Toledo in the B 10, 11, 12, 14 and they're 5-7 or 6-6.

    B) Noone cares about Florida State against Troy, Wyoming, or NE Ohio Barber's College besides total degenerate gamblers and the annoying fags who always root for the little guy and have to let you know that at every opportunity.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    last time I checked it was top16. am I wrong? Would be only the second time ever and ill gladly stand corrected

    Both right...


    3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, or the Sun Belt Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

    A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

    B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

    Dumbest. Rule. Ever.

    Nobody gives a rat's ass about directional MAC schools, especially in major bowl games.
    If the MAC champ is higher ranked than the AAC/ACC/Pac-12 champ, why shouldn't they get in?
    A) Nine out of 10 times, the non-AQ team is overrated. Put a 10-2 or 11-1 Toledo in the B 10, 11, 12, 14 and they're 5-7 or 6-6.

    B) Noone cares about Florida State against Troy, Wyoming, or NE Ohio Barber's College besides total degenerate gamblers and the annoying fags who always root for the little guy and have to let you know that at every opportunity.
    My dad used to take me to NE Ohio Barbers College games on crisp fall afternoons.

    Go Fightin Shears!
  • IMALOSER_IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158

    last time I checked it was top16. am I wrong? Would be only the second time ever and ill gladly stand corrected

    Both right...


    3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, or the Sun Belt Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

    A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

    B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

    Dumbest. Rule. Ever.

    Nobody gives a rat's ass about directional MAC schools, especially in major bowl games.
    If the MAC champ is higher ranked than the AAC/ACC/Pac-12 champ, why shouldn't they get in?
    I think the answer to your question is Utah.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    IMALOSER_ said:

    last time I checked it was top16. am I wrong? Would be only the second time ever and ill gladly stand corrected

    Both right...


    3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, or the Sun Belt Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

    A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

    B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

    Dumbest. Rule. Ever.

    Nobody gives a rat's ass about directional MAC schools, especially in major bowl games.
    If the MAC champ is higher ranked than the AAC/ACC/Pac-12 champ, why shouldn't they get in?
    I think the answer to your question is Utah.
    Huh?

    http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=290020333
  • IMALOSER_IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158
    edited August 2013

    IMALOSER_ said:

    last time I checked it was top16. am I wrong? Would be only the second time ever and ill gladly stand corrected

    Both right...


    3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, or the Sun Belt Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

    A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

    B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

    Dumbest. Rule. Ever.

    Nobody gives a rat's ass about directional MAC schools, especially in major bowl games.
    If the MAC champ is higher ranked than the AAC/ACC/Pac-12 champ, why shouldn't they get in?
    I think the answer to your question is Utah.
    Huh?

    http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=290020333
    Huh?

    sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/box-score/201211100065/utah-utes--washington-huskies

    sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/box-score/201111250094/colorado-buffaloes--utah-utes
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    IMALOSER_ said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    last time I checked it was top16. am I wrong? Would be only the second time ever and ill gladly stand corrected

    Both right...


    3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, or the Sun Belt Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

    A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

    B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

    Dumbest. Rule. Ever.

    Nobody gives a rat's ass about directional MAC schools, especially in major bowl games.
    If the MAC champ is higher ranked than the AAC/ACC/Pac-12 champ, why shouldn't they get in?
    I think the answer to your question is Utah.
    Huh?

    http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=290020333
    Huh?

    sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/box-score/201211100065/utah-utes--washington-huskies

    sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/box-score/201111250094/colorado-buffaloes--utah-utes
    What does that Utah team have to do with being ranked in the top 16? That was a bad team that went 8-5.

    I provided you a good Utah team who more than proved they belong in a BCS game.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    IMALOSER_ said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    last time I checked it was top16. am I wrong? Would be only the second time ever and ill gladly stand corrected

    Both right...


    3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, or the Sun Belt Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

    A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

    B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

    Dumbest. Rule. Ever.

    Nobody gives a rat's ass about directional MAC schools, especially in major bowl games.
    If the MAC champ is higher ranked than the AAC/ACC/Pac-12 champ, why shouldn't they get in?
    I think the answer to your question is Utah.
    Huh?

    http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=290020333
    Huh?

    sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/box-score/201211100065/utah-utes--washington-huskies

    sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/box-score/201111250094/colorado-buffaloes--utah-utes
    What does that Utah team have to do with being ranked in the top 16? That was a bad team that went 8-5.

    I provided you a good Utah team who more than proved they belong in a BCS game.
    That Utah team proved they belonged like UW proved they were Holiday Bowl champs against Nebraska. Check the facts.
  • IMALOSER_IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158

    IMALOSER_ said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    last time I checked it was top16. am I wrong? Would be only the second time ever and ill gladly stand corrected

    Both right...


    3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, or the Sun Belt Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

    A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

    B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

    Dumbest. Rule. Ever.

    Nobody gives a rat's ass about directional MAC schools, especially in major bowl games.
    If the MAC champ is higher ranked than the AAC/ACC/Pac-12 champ, why shouldn't they get in?
    I think the answer to your question is Utah.
    Huh?

    http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=290020333
    Huh?

    sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/box-score/201211100065/utah-utes--washington-huskies

    sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/box-score/201111250094/colorado-buffaloes--utah-utes
    What does that Utah team have to do with being ranked in the top 16? That was a bad team that went 8-5.

    I provided you a good Utah team who more than proved they belong in a BCS game.
    Did UW prove they belonged last year when they beat Stanford?

    Something about a squirrel and his nuts comes to mind.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Some crappy computer predicts the best/worst Lather.Rinse.Repeat. ever for Washington:

    http://predictionmachine.com/College-Football-2013-Standings-Bowl-Picks
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    Some crappy computer predicts the best/worst Lather.Rinse.Repeat. ever for Washington:

    http://predictionmachine.com/College-Football-2013-Standings-Bowl-Picks

    My NCAA 14 season tells a different story.

    What happens in chat stay in chat.
  • IMALOSER_IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158

    Some crappy computer predicts the best/worst Lather.Rinse.Repeat. ever for Washington:

    http://predictionmachine.com/College-Football-2013-Standings-Bowl-Picks

    UCLA 6-6? They should just fire Mora now. Hiring Mora for one year and firing him worked for the Seahawks, not sure what UCLA is waiting for.

    Mora lost more games each of the 4 years he coached in the NFL. Does he suffer from Neuheisalitis? I'm concerned for UCLA.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    IMALOSER_ said:

    Some crappy computer predicts the best/worst Lather.Rinse.Repeat. ever for Washington:

    http://predictionmachine.com/College-Football-2013-Standings-Bowl-Picks

    UCLA 6-6? They should just fire Mora now. Hiring Mora for one year and firing him worked for the Seahawks, not sure what UCLA is waiting for.

    Mora lost more games each of the 4 years he coached in the NFL. Does he suffer from Neuheisalitis? I'm concerned for UCLA.
    I actually do expect UCLA to win fewer than 9 games this year:

    @Nebraska
    @Stanford
    @Oregon
    @Arizona
    vs Arizona St
    @USC

    If UCLA wins half of those and the six easy games on its schedule to go 9-3, Mora should be the conference COY.
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    IMALOSER_ said:

    Some crappy computer predicts the best/worst Lather.Rinse.Repeat. ever for Washington:

    http://predictionmachine.com/College-Football-2013-Standings-Bowl-Picks

    UCLA 6-6? They should just fire Mora now. Hiring Mora for one year and firing him worked for the Seahawks, not sure what UCLA is waiting for.

    Mora lost more games each of the 4 years he coached in the NFL. Does he suffer from Neuheisalitis? I'm concerned for UCLA.
    I actually do expect UCLA to win fewer than 9 games this year:

    @Nebraska
    @Stanford
    @Oregon
    @Arizona
    vs Arizona St
    @USC

    If UCLA wins half of those and the six easy games on its schedule to go 9-3, Mora should be the conference COY.
    What a Broon!!!!

    Already making excuses for a tough schedule.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    IMALOSER_ said:

    Some crappy computer predicts the best/worst Lather.Rinse.Repeat. ever for Washington:

    http://predictionmachine.com/College-Football-2013-Standings-Bowl-Picks

    UCLA 6-6? They should just fire Mora now. Hiring Mora for one year and firing him worked for the Seahawks, not sure what UCLA is waiting for.

    Mora lost more games each of the 4 years he coached in the NFL. Does he suffer from Neuheisalitis? I'm concerned for UCLA.
    I actually do expect UCLA to win fewer than 9 games this year:

    @Nebraska
    @Stanford
    @Oregon
    @Arizona
    vs Arizona St
    @USC

    If UCLA wins half of those and the six easy games on its schedule to go 9-3, Mora should be the conference COY.
    What a Broon!!!!

    Already making excuses for a tough schedule.
    That's a REAL tough schedule, not the alleged tough schedules that Sark has faced.

    If Sark went 9-3 against that schedule (or any schedule for that matter), I'd be impressed as well.

    Keep pressing.
  • IMALOSER_IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158

    IMALOSER_ said:

    Some crappy computer predicts the best/worst Lather.Rinse.Repeat. ever for Washington:

    http://predictionmachine.com/College-Football-2013-Standings-Bowl-Picks

    UCLA 6-6? They should just fire Mora now. Hiring Mora for one year and firing him worked for the Seahawks, not sure what UCLA is waiting for.

    Mora lost more games each of the 4 years he coached in the NFL. Does he suffer from Neuheisalitis? I'm concerned for UCLA.
    I actually do expect UCLA to win fewer than 9 games this year:

    @Nebraska
    @Stanford
    @Oregon
    @Arizona
    vs Arizona St
    @USC

    If UCLA wins half of those and the six easy games on its schedule to go 9-3, Mora should be the conference COY.
    You expect fewer than 9 wins? I thought you were a real Bruin fan. That type of expectations would never have been accepted in the Terry Donahue Era. It's fans like you that have made Bruin Football soft. Not even a hard nosed James disciple can change the culture with fans like you.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    IMALOSER_ said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    Some crappy computer predicts the best/worst Lather.Rinse.Repeat. ever for Washington:

    http://predictionmachine.com/College-Football-2013-Standings-Bowl-Picks

    UCLA 6-6? They should just fire Mora now. Hiring Mora for one year and firing him worked for the Seahawks, not sure what UCLA is waiting for.

    Mora lost more games each of the 4 years he coached in the NFL. Does he suffer from Neuheisalitis? I'm concerned for UCLA.
    I actually do expect UCLA to win fewer than 9 games this year:

    @Nebraska
    @Stanford
    @Oregon
    @Arizona
    vs Arizona St
    @USC

    If UCLA wins half of those and the six easy games on its schedule to go 9-3, Mora should be the conference COY.
    You expect fewer than 9 wins? I thought you were a real Bruin fan. That type of expectations would never have been accepted in the Terry Donahue Era. It's fans like you that have made Bruin Football soft. Not even a hard nosed James disciple can change the culture with fans like you.
    I'm not a Bruin fan. Great pressing as always though.
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    IMALOSER_ said:

    Some crappy computer predicts the best/worst Lather.Rinse.Repeat. ever for Washington:

    http://predictionmachine.com/College-Football-2013-Standings-Bowl-Picks

    UCLA 6-6? They should just fire Mora now. Hiring Mora for one year and firing him worked for the Seahawks, not sure what UCLA is waiting for.

    Mora lost more games each of the 4 years he coached in the NFL. Does he suffer from Neuheisalitis? I'm concerned for UCLA.
    I actually do expect UCLA to win fewer than 9 games this year:

    @Nebraska
    @Stanford
    @Oregon
    @Arizona
    vs Arizona St
    @USC

    If UCLA wins half of those and the six easy games on its schedule to go 9-3, Mora should be the conference COY.
    What a Broon!!!!

    Already making excuses for a tough schedule.
    That's a REAL tough schedule, not the alleged tough schedules that Sark has faced.

    If Sark went 9-3 against that schedule (or any schedule for that matter), I'd be impressed as well.

    Keep pressing.
    You essentially posted their Pac 12 schedule.

    The Noog bus would role your ass over if you tried that with Sark.

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    IMALOSER_ said:

    Some crappy computer predicts the best/worst Lather.Rinse.Repeat. ever for Washington:

    http://predictionmachine.com/College-Football-2013-Standings-Bowl-Picks

    UCLA 6-6? They should just fire Mora now. Hiring Mora for one year and firing him worked for the Seahawks, not sure what UCLA is waiting for.

    Mora lost more games each of the 4 years he coached in the NFL. Does he suffer from Neuheisalitis? I'm concerned for UCLA.
    I actually do expect UCLA to win fewer than 9 games this year:

    @Nebraska
    @Stanford
    @Oregon
    @Arizona
    vs Arizona St
    @USC

    If UCLA wins half of those and the six easy games on its schedule to go 9-3, Mora should be the conference COY.
    What a Broon!!!!

    Already making excuses for a tough schedule.
    That's a REAL tough schedule, not the alleged tough schedules that Sark has faced.

    If Sark went 9-3 against that schedule (or any schedule for that matter), I'd be impressed as well.

    Keep pressing.
    You essentially posted their Pac 12 schedule.

    The Noog bus would role your ass over if you tried that with Sark.

    They got the four other best teams in the Pac-12 (in my opinion) all on the road plus Nebraska on the road.

    Game location matters, especially when you don't have a great home field advantage of your own.

    The Bruins got a break with the schedule last year and they're paying for it this year.

    See, I can be realistic. I'd apply the same logic to Sark, but he goes 7-6 against so many different schedules that it's not worth the effort.
Sign In or Register to comment.