Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Washington, Oregon, Ohio State or Stanford?
CharlesMincy
Member Posts: 44
Where would you send your son? What would you consider the best environment for your kid? What would you base your decision on?
Comments
-
Honestly right now I would send them to Stanford.
Ohio state is a good degree but just a football factory. Talking to some former players at Utah they didn't exactly enjoy playing for Meyer. Great football coach but it's all about football.
Oregon is an avg degree and a football factory. No thanks when compared.
Uw is a good degree but a mediocre football program. I do like how Petersen stresses academics in the recruiting process. I would put them #2.
-
Depend....if you don't care about academics and just wanna play football you go to UO.
If you're like 99% of the recruits and are a 3 star or lower you go to Stanford.
If you can't get into Stanford you go to UW....unless you just wanna be close to mom and dad. -
Please, a lot of kids don't care about academis and go to UW. Generalizations are stupid.HuskyJW said:Depend....if you don't care about academics and just wanna play football you go to UO.
If you're like 99% of the recruits and are a 3 star or lower you go to Stanford.
If you can't get into Stanford you go to UW....unless you just wanna be close to mom and dad. -
Charles, send junior to UW.
-
I never blame the parents for sending their kids to Stanford.
-
The youth really has an Oregon problem. The championship high school game I watched last night was flooded with little punks wearing the "O". I didn't see 1 block W other than mine. It was not that bad about 5 years ago.
Oregon has really marketed itself fantastically with the youths. It's the hip place to go.
It's something that can only be cured with winning, and lots of it. If Petersen isn't the guy, UW may never recover. -
Stanford, no matter what.
If Junior is good enough to be recruited there and still can't get in (B average), then he's not going to light the academic world on fire anywhere and should thus go to the best football situation. Where that is is a matter of judgement at any point in time.
But if he can get into Stanford, you do that every fucking time.
Trust me. My middle daughter if fucking smart ... like 3.98 full IB, Calculus, two years HL Physics, full year of college level chemistry, etc. etc. smart. SAT scores to match.
She applied, and even with all that is as likely to be rejected as get in. Who am I kidding? More likely to not get in than get in.
D1 athletic recruits have no idea what a lottery ticket it is to be recruited there and get in w/ 3.3 GPA. No fucking idea.
You take that and run every fucking time. Best of both worlds. An Ivy League/MIT/Cal Tech/Elite small college (yes, Middlebury included, you fags) education and big time sports. Stanford is the fucking bomb.
If you did, in fact, play football for UW, take my advice: get over yourself, make it clear to him that his life outside of fb will be unaffected whether he goes to UW, Arizona, Oregon, WSU, Ohio State, Michigan State or any place else. Stanford is a much, much different story. I might assign some of the Stanford ju ju to Michigan and Cal, but they really are not on Furd's level academically or resources-wise.
Ask yourself: why did Barry Sanders send junior to Stanford instead of Oklahoma State?
There's your answer. -
You don't buy the actual academics with your degree. You are buying the network and the corporations that hire from your institution. Some of you need to learn the difference.
-
That is exactly correct. And, though it will KILL people on this bored to read this, Goldman, JP Morgan, Hedge Funds and other high level companies don't recruit at UW any more than they do at Arizona State.AtomicDawg said:You don't buy the actual academics with your degree. You are buying the network and the corporations that hire from your institution. Some of you need to learn the difference.
Where they do recruit is at Stanford, of course, and at the Ivy Leagues, Duke, Vanderbilt and, here's where people are going to shit their pants because they don't want to hear it:
Williams, Amherst, Bowdoin, Wesleyan, Middlebury, Vassar, Washington & Lee, Davidson, Pomona, Claremont McKenna, Wellesley, Harvey Mudd, etc. etc. etc.
So in that sense, it doesn't matter whether you go to UW or Arizona. It really doesn't at the end of the day. I'm saying this as a Washington grad who runs around with all kinds of stereotypes in my head about the typical Zona student.
Of course, if your'e interviewing with a guy from Washington, it's going to be huge. But that's true of any school.
-
What, no Middlebury?creepycoug said:
That is exactly correct. And, though it will KILL people on this bored to read this, Goldman, JP Morgan, Hedge Funds and other high level companies don't recruit at UW any more than they do at Arizona State.AtomicDawg said:You don't buy the actual academics with your degree. You are buying the network and the corporations that hire from your institution. Some of you need to learn the difference.
Where they do recruit is at Stanford, of course, and at the Ivy Leagues, Duke, Vanderbilt and, here's where people are going to shit their pants because they don't want to hear it:
Williams, Amherst, Bowdoin, Wesleyan, Middlebury, Vassar, Washington & Lee, Davidson, Pomona, Claremont McKenna, Wellesley, Harvey Mudd, etc. etc. etc.
So in that sense, it doesn't matter whether you go to UW or Arizona. It really doesn't at the end of the day. I'm saying this as a Washington grad who runs around with all kinds of stereotypes in my head about the typical Zona student.
Of course, if your'e interviewing with a guy from Washington, it's going to be huge. But that's true of any school.
