What SoftyFS is hearing
Comments
-
The difference is that I can't see Ross blowing up run plays like Peters could. It's rare to have a corner that hits as hard as he does and has all the cover abilities.Tequilla said:No question that expecting Ross To play at Peters' level this week probably isn't going to happen.
That being said there are opportunities to cover what you are losing w Peters and Ross at least athletically will be able to help there.
One thing people need to not anchor to is that the positions that players have been playing at are necessarily their best positions. It's possible that RB is Shaq's best position. It's possible that Ross' best position may be as a DB. -
Another Twatter gem from today... Doog of the week competition is fierce
-
Twatter never more appropriate.MrsPetersen said:Another Twatter gem from today... Doog of the week competition is fierce
-
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
-
TheGlove said:
Can we get a Huskie Roadkill List going:
Stringfellow
Stringfellow
Stringfellow
Hobert
Stringfellow
? -
The best response to twats like this that claim he won't recruit inner city kids is the following:MrsPetersen said:FYI guys, Peterman will be fired in two years according to this fucktard on Twatter:
CHRIS PETERSEN RECRUITED NAIJIEL HALE... WHO IS THE SON OF NATE DOGG -
Turns out his kid had the crud.CuntWaffle said:He made this decision for his newly born kid. He knew that he could get ready for the draft instead of having to play for a church school coach.
I'm glad he started thinking about his family. -
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do? -
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts. -
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.







