No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.
Fortunately, Hundley can only throw the deep ball. And there isn't a receiver in the country that will beat Ross deep.
Ross will probably give up the game winning touchdown on a deep pass
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.
TSIO.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.
What good did that do?
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.
whoosh?
Nope.
Just stating the facts.
In that case, disafuckingree
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?
GTFO
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.
TSIO.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.
What good did that do?
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.
whoosh?
Nope.
Just stating the facts.
In that case, disafuckingree
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?
GTFO
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.
TSIO.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.
What good did that do?
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.
whoosh?
Nope.
Just stating the facts.
In that case, disafuckingree
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?
GTFO
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.
TSIO.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.
What good did that do?
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.
whoosh?
Nope.
Just stating the facts.
In that case, disafuckingree
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?
GTFO
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
I just heard the news. Not shocked because you could see his persona on the field wasn't exactly Peterman's type of behavior. If he behaves the same during practice, I understand.
But damn, my two favorite players at the end of last season have now been dismissed (String).
Is this a whoosh attempt? You do realize that after Sloppy Steve left for USC, Tui was the interim coach and he suspended him for part of the bowl game against BYU.
So let's see......1 player, 2 different staffs, and multiple suspensions / issues over the last two seasons for that 1 player.
1 player vs. numerous coaches on each staff....hmmmmmmm.....tough one to figure out.
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.
TSIO.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.
What good did that do?
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.
whoosh?
Nope.
Just stating the facts.
In that case, disafuckingree
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?
GTFO
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
Massively over-valuing Peters IMO
I'd take Trufant over Peters.
Trufant > Lockner too, of course.
And Senior Trufant might have a slight edge over junior Peters. But Peters career was far better than Trufant's.
I get that there are a few on this board that hate Locker as a QB from the standpoint that they think he's tremendously overrated. That's fine.
There's really no reason for him to take the bashing that he gets at this point. And for every QB that this University has had since Cody Pickett, I'd take Locker over every single one of them.
Locker was far from perfect ... but he was also far from its biggest problem.
I get that there are a few on this board that hate Locker as a QB from the standpoint that they think he's tremendously overrated. That's fine.
There's really no reason for him to take the bashing that he gets at this point. And for every QB that this University has had since Cody Pickett, I'd take Locker over every single one of them.
Locker was far from perfect ... but he was also far from its biggest problem.
UW upgraded at QB the day Lockner left the program.
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
5'9", 170 lb cornerbacks are the wave of the future! Can't wait to see Dwayne Stanford or Darren Carrington matched up with him next year.
I get that there are a few on this board that hate Locker as a QB from the standpoint that they think he's tremendously overrated. That's fine.
There's really no reason for him to take the bashing that he gets at this point. And for every QB that this University has had since Cody Pickett, I'd take Locker over every single one of them.
Locker was far from perfect ... but he was also far from its biggest problem.
UW upgraded at QB the day Lockner left the program.
Because 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4???
Please ... Price was a slightly above average PAC QB.
Jake wasn't always great, but IMO he was far better than Price.
I get that there are a few on this board that hate Locker as a QB from the standpoint that they think he's tremendously overrated. That's fine.
There's really no reason for him to take the bashing that he gets at this point. And for every QB that this University has had since Cody Pickett, I'd take Locker over every single one of them.
Locker was far from perfect ... but he was also far from its biggest problem.
UW upgraded at QB the day Lockner left the program.
Because 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4???
Please ... Price was a slightly above average PAC QB.
Jake wasn't always great, but IMO he was far better than Price.
Doogs hate facts.
Price was a slightly above average Pac QB, which was still a huge upgrade over Lockner:
I get that there are a few on this board that hate Locker as a QB from the standpoint that they think he's tremendously overrated. That's fine.
There's really no reason for him to take the bashing that he gets at this point. And for every QB that this University has had since Cody Pickett, I'd take Locker over every single one of them.
Locker was far from perfect ... but he was also far from its biggest problem.
UW upgraded at QB the day Lockner left the program.
Because 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4???
Please ... Price was a slightly above average PAC QB.
Jake wasn't always great, but IMO he was far better than Price.
I get that there are a few on this board that hate Locker as a QB from the standpoint that they think he's tremendously overrated. That's fine.
There's really no reason for him to take the bashing that he gets at this point. And for every QB that this University has had since Cody Pickett, I'd take Locker over every single one of them.
Locker was far from perfect ... but he was also far from its biggest problem.
UW upgraded at QB the day Lockner left the program.
Because 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4???
Please ... Price was a slightly above average PAC QB.
Jake wasn't always great, but IMO he was far better than Price.
Doogs hate facts.
Price was a slightly above average Pac QB, which was still a huge upgrade over Lockner:
Comments
Ross will probably give up the game winning touchdown on a deep pass
I'd take Trufant over Peters.
Peters picks Trufant's cotton.
But damn, my two favorite players at the end of last season have now been dismissed (String).
So let's see......1 player, 2 different staffs, and multiple suspensions / issues over the last two seasons for that 1 player.
1 player vs. numerous coaches on each staff....hmmmmmmm.....tough one to figure out.
And Senior Trufant might have a slight edge over junior Peters. But Peters career was far better than Trufant's.
I get that there are a few on this board that hate Locker as a QB from the standpoint that they think he's tremendously overrated. That's fine.
There's really no reason for him to take the bashing that he gets at this point. And for every QB that this University has had since Cody Pickett, I'd take Locker over every single one of them.
Locker was far from perfect ... but he was also far from its biggest problem.
I'm sure Nate Dogg is living in the Long Beach projects, along with Snoop and Warren G, just like it's 1990.
Please ... Price was a slightly above average PAC QB.
Jake wasn't always great, but IMO he was far better than Price.
Price was a slightly above average Pac QB, which was still a huge upgrade over Lockner:
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2007-passing.html (Lockner 9th in passing efficiency)
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2009-passing.html (Lockner 4th in passing efficiency)
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2010-passing.html (Lockner 9th in passing efficiency)
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-12/2011-passing.html (Price 2nd in passing efficiency)
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-12/2012-passing.html (Price 9th in passing efficiency)
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-12/2013-passing.html (Price 2nd in passing efficiency)
Being second best in the conference two out of three years >>>>>>> being second worst in the conference two out of three years.
Tough call.