Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

LIFPO

13567

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,551 Swaye's Wigwam

    I'm not arguing that Petersen is better than Chip. Chip is awesome.

    But none of you knew that when Bellotti brought him from nowhere.

    And Bellotti built a hell of a lot better program than Sark to follow.

    It's not that bad. It's really not. The offensive talent isn't good. That's obvious, but do we need a team full of all stars to score more than 10 points against Stanford and ASU?
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,254 Standard Supporter
    Canard said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Canard said:

    Some cults are more effective than others.

    Like 92-12 effective?
    Lulz, when 80+ of those or so were over the little sisters of the poor and poorer.
    Nobody says 92-12 in the MW/WAC is equivalent to 92-12 in the Pac 12 moron
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778

    I will say this about Chip / Peterman.

    We all laughed at Dennis Dixon as a joke of a QB who folded under pressure for 3 years and as soon as Chip arrived at Oregon he looked like the best player in college Football. Thankfully the knee was the MVP of that season.

    Chip didn't need multiple years to turn shit QBs into gold. That these 3 look like such crap is troubling

    Chip also had a stable of quality running backs and an OL.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,841
    PurpleJ said:

    I will say this about Chip / Peterman.

    We all laughed at Dennis Dixon as a joke of a QB who folded under pressure for 3 years and as soon as Chip arrived at Oregon he looked like the best player in college Football. Thankfully the knee was the MVP of that season.

    Chip didn't need multiple years to turn shit QBs into gold. That these 3 look like such crap is troubling

    Chip also had a stable of quality running backs and an OL.
    And Uncle Phil ...
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,551 Swaye's Wigwam

    I will say this about Chip / Peterman.

    We all laughed at Dennis Dixon as a joke of a QB who folded under pressure for 3 years and as soon as Chip arrived at Oregon he looked like the best player in college Football. Thankfully the knee was the MVP of that season.

    Chip didn't need multiple years to turn shit QBs into gold. That these 3 look like such crap is troubling

    Chip turned Jeremiah Masoli and Darren Thomas into good QB's. Oregon has way better offensive talent around, but that is a good point. Last in the conference should not be accepted and it's pathetic that some here are.
    Who the fuck is accepting this shit? Saying LIPO isn't the same as accepting this. Christ.
    Saying how is Petersen supposed to have a decent offense with no QB, a bad OL, a LB at RB, and shitty WR's is accepting it. 12th in the fucking conference. That's dead last.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,733 Founders Club

    I will say this about Chip / Peterman.

    We all laughed at Dennis Dixon as a joke of a QB who folded under pressure for 3 years and as soon as Chip arrived at Oregon he looked like the best player in college Football. Thankfully the knee was the MVP of that season.

    Chip didn't need multiple years to turn shit QBs into gold. That these 3 look like such crap is troubling

    Chip turned Jeremiah Masoli and Darren Thomas into good QB's. Oregon has way better offensive talent around, but that is a good point. Last in the conference should not be accepted and it's pathetic that some here are.
    http://espn.go.com/ncf/conferences/statistics/team/_/stat/total/year/2014/id/9/pac-12-conference

    The top 3 offensive teams in terms of yards just happen to have the 3 best quarterbacks in the conference and skill players to go with them. The only team with an arguably worse quarterback than us is Utah, and that kid has balls that ours don't. Our qb's won't run for the tough yards like him. OSU is the anomally, they should be higher, but Mannion is also pretty overrated imo. Stanford-UCLA all have at least 2/4 offensive units that are better than ours, whether that be receivers/line/quarterback/rb.

    This is not accepting anything but reality. I'm pissed that we can't even gain 3 consecutive first downs more than once a game, but Sark still left no fucking ammo on offense. That has become the biggest doog myth about this team, and was basically the main reason we were supposed to win 10+ games this year.
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    In 2008, Chip's offense thumped the shit out of Purple Jesus and the gang in the first week of the season while using a QB platoon of a future FCS back-up, a passing fullback on campus for a month, and a future KSU wideout.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
    topdawgnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I will say this about Chip / Peterman.

    We all laughed at Dennis Dixon as a joke of a QB who folded under pressure for 3 years and as soon as Chip arrived at Oregon he looked like the best player in college Football. Thankfully the knee was the MVP of that season.

    Chip didn't need multiple years to turn shit QBs into gold. That these 3 look like such crap is troubling

    Chip also had a stable of quality running backs and an OL.
    And Uncle Phil ...
    And Destiny and Mystique
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,551 Swaye's Wigwam
    haie said:

    I will say this about Chip / Peterman.

    We all laughed at Dennis Dixon as a joke of a QB who folded under pressure for 3 years and as soon as Chip arrived at Oregon he looked like the best player in college Football. Thankfully the knee was the MVP of that season.

    Chip didn't need multiple years to turn shit QBs into gold. That these 3 look like such crap is troubling

    Chip turned Jeremiah Masoli and Darren Thomas into good QB's. Oregon has way better offensive talent around, but that is a good point. Last in the conference should not be accepted and it's pathetic that some here are.
    http://espn.go.com/ncf/conferences/statistics/team/_/stat/total/year/2014/id/9/pac-12-conference

    The top 3 offensive teams in terms of yards just happen to have the 3 best quarterbacks in the conference and skill players to go with them. The only team with an arguably worse quarterback than us is Utah, and that kid has balls that ours don't. Our qb's won't run for the tough yards like him. OSU is the anomally, they should be higher, but Mannion is also pretty overrated imo. Stanford-UCLA all have at least 2/4 offensive units that are better than ours, whether that be receivers/line/quarterback/rb.

    This is not accepting anything but reality. I'm pissed that we can't even gain 3 consecutive first downs more than once a game, but Sark still left no fucking ammo on offense. That has become the biggest doog myth about this team, and was basically the main reason we were supposed to win 10+ games this year.
    Again, I'm not expecting a great offense. Just better than 12th. 10 combined offensive points against Stanford and ASU. Best rushing game since conference play began, and 3 fucking points was the result.