Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.
The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
This.
The sky is not falling. If we lose to UCLA, ASU, Zona, and Oregon, then the sky is falling and we will likely suck forever
What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Bowl win (assumed).
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.
Actually, I'm not.
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no Oregon - no UCLA - no Az - maybe, but history on the road says no WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up
What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
Damone is a panicky little bitch. HTH.
That's for the bigger picture. I'm just talking about this year.
Have I mentioned how they win or lose matters? I was never more optimistic about UW football than after the 1990 loss to Colorado.
Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.
The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Bowl win (assumed).
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.
Actually, I'm not.
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no Oregon - no UCLA - no Az - maybe, but history on the road says no WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up
Possibly true this year. A lot of fans,players, and recruits would buy in and work harder than ever
We need to change the mojo. iDawg and I were concerned in 2007 that losing would become permanent here. Its easier to go from good to bad than to get back
5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Bowl win (assumed).
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.
Actually, I'm not.
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no Oregon - no UCLA - no Az - maybe, but history on the road says no WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up
Possibly true this year. A lot of fans,players, and recruits would buy in and work harder than ever
We need to change the mojo. iDawg and I were concerned in 2007 that losing would become permanent here. Its easier to go from good to bad than to get back
I want UW to win @ Autzen more than any other game this year, but we all know how it will play out
Doogs put up a valiant first half effort to go into the locker room tied at 14.
What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
Damone is a panicky little bitch. HTH.
That's for the bigger picture. I'm just talking about this year.
Have I mentioned how they win or lose matters? I was never more optimistic about UW football than after the 1990 loss to Colorado.
HTH.
Omg if you use your stupid golf analogy one more time I'll blow my brains out.
Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.
The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
The offense scored 6 points. The the tallest midget in the offensive circus won.
Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.
The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
Damone is a panicky little bitch. HTH.
That's for the bigger picture. I'm just talking about this year.
Have I mentioned how they win or lose matters? I was never more optimistic about UW football than after the 1990 loss to Colorado.
HTH.
The Holiday Bowl loss to KSU in 99 brought me relief ...
5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Bowl win (assumed).
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.
Actually, I'm not.
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no Oregon - no UCLA - no Az - maybe, but history on the road says no WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up
What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
Damone is a panicky little bitch. HTH.
That's for the bigger picture. I'm just talking about this year.
Have I mentioned how they win or lose matters? I was never more optimistic about UW football than after the 1990 loss to Colorado.
HTH.
Omg if you use your stupid golf analogy one more time I'll blow my brains out.
Ok...so it's like this...a bad golfer skips one off the water, off a rock and leaves a tap in birdie...is he a good golfer because he got a birdie? 18 holes tell the story.
You know I'm right, stop Dooging it up. Same discussions I had with doogs when we were just happy to be 5-1. I'm still right.
some of you assholes have lost your edge. 5 games in we know what they are. If sark was still coach we would be all on his shit. 5-4 (at best) is happening. Peterman gets some grace because he has actually done it before and he's not sark, but jesus.
I would have fired him at the 50 yard line after the fake punt.
some of you assholes have lost your edge. 5 games in we know what they are. If sark was still coach we would be all on his shit. 5-4 (at best) is happening. Peterman gets some grace because he has actually done it before and he's not sark, but jesus.
I would have fired him at the 50 yard line after the fake punt.
Yeah yeah, you'd also fire Saban for hiring Lane Kiffin. We get it.
Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.
The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
Sven says everyone is terrible.
This. The day Sven has something good to say about a coach I will probably hurl myself off the Aurora bridge because it probably means the world is going to end.
Comments
The sky is not falling. If we lose to UCLA, ASU, Zona, and Oregon, then the sky is falling and we will likely suck forever
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no
Oregon - no
UCLA - no
Az - maybe, but history on the road says no
WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up
Have I mentioned how they win or lose matters? I was never more optimistic about UW football than after the 1990 loss to Colorado.
HTH.
Possibly true this year. A lot of fans,players, and recruits would buy in and work harder than ever
We need to change the mojo. iDawg and I were concerned in 2007 that losing would become permanent here. Its easier to go from good to bad than to get back
Have you watched any of the last 5 games?
Doogs put up a valiant first half effort to go into the locker room tied at 14.
Final score:
Ducks 52 Huskies 28
You know I'm right, stop Dooging it up. Same discussions I had with doogs when we were just happy to be 5-1. I'm still right.