I'm i the only negadawg left?
Comments
-
5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
-
If Sark were here 90% of the fanbase would be elated because he would be constantly bringing up that Price had graduated yet we had the ball with a chance to tie Stanford at the end. That was a hard game to watch at times but it's not Petersen's fault Sark recruited 3 worthless 4*'s; what's he going to do throw KJ out there?
-
I thought we judged sark by conference wins? Same standard for petersen. Don't go all Kim on me now.allpurpleallgold said:5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
-
Miley fucking cyrus. We might be more effective just running a wing-t or some Navy shit.
-
Peterman is a winner.
For the first time since 2003 I feel like UW football is in good hands.
Maybe I'm doogin' but 96-13 will tend to make me trust this year may be a transition year, but the future is bright.
And if the light at the end of the tunnel is a train ... my kids are starting hockey on Saturday's, so my best Husky watching days are likely behind me for at least the next 10-15 years ...
So fuck it ... I'm going to enjoy the ride. -
Bowl win (assumed).allpurpleallgold said:5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed) -
Why are you comparing Peterman to Sark?
-
With Sark you knew he would NEVER learn from his mistakes. He would use his used car salesmen pitch after every loss but you could tell he had no idea why he lost. I fucking hated the "i don't know what went wrong we had such a good week at practice. Guess we will have to review the tapes bullshit".
Petersen admitted that the fake punt was retarded and his fault and he should have never called it. Yea he got out coached but at least it sounds like he has an idea what the problem is and I'm sure he will focus on it this week instead of chasing tail from slutty waitresses in Bellevue.
a lot of people including myself vented after the game yesterday with our displeasure with how Petersen called that 2nd half. I'm still in LIPO because this kind of shit hasn't become a pattern yet which it did with Sark.
It was a shitty called 2nd half but I still have faith Petersen will get the program on the right track. -
Am I?RaceBannon said:Why are you comparing Peterman to Sark?
Maybe I am to some extent. When I hear coaches say, "practice was great, we did not play well for whatever reason", I want to kick them in the balls , for whatever reason. Both sark and Petersen have said that recently. -
Peterman wins the Fiesta Bowl on three trick plays ... and he is brilliant.CuntWaffle said:With Sark you knew he would NEVER learn from his mistakes. He would use his used car salesmen pitch after every loss but you could tell he had no idea why he lost. I fucking hated the "i don't know what went wrong we had such a good week at practice. Guess we will have to review the tapes bullshit".
Petersen admitted that the fake punt was retarded and his fault and he should have never called it. Yea he got out coached but at least it sounds like he has an idea what the problem is and I'm sure he will focus on it this week instead of chasing tail from slutty waitresses in Bellevue.
a lot of people including myself vented after the game yesterday with our displeasure with how Petersen called that 2nd half. I'm still in LIPO because this kind of shit hasn't become a pattern yet which it did with Sark.
It was a shitty called 2nd half but I still have faith Petersen will get the program on the right track.
Peterman runs a fake punt because he has shit QB ... and he is being compared to Sark ...
-
Aren't you?MikeDamone said:
Am I?RaceBannon said:Why are you comparing Peterman to Sark?
-
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.MikeDamone said:
Bowl win (assumed).allpurpleallgold said:5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed) -
For the record , I have been no sweatpants boner and LIPO from day 1. When I say NegaDawg I am taking about this year and the fact that Petersen does actually need more time. PLSS said it early and often, this will not be a good team, next year might be worse. Petersen has earned the LIPO benefit of the doubt, Sark didn't. The first 5 games tell us we need to wait. This year isn't going to be the year.
-
Georgia Tech's offense would be fucking mean with this roster, and I'm being serious.PurpleReign said:Miley fucking cyrus. We might be more effective just running a wing-t or some Navy shit.
Run that shit for a half Peterman and see how it goes -
Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked. -
I just hope Petersen doesn't suffer from the third year jinx.
-
Your eyes are as good as mine.RaceBannon said:
Aren't you?MikeDamone said:
Am I?RaceBannon said:Why are you comparing Peterman to Sark?
-
That's what I'm saying.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked. -
Is that what you're saying?MikeDamone said:
That's what I'm saying.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked. -
What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
-
The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked. -
This.EsophagealFeces said:What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
The sky is not falling. If we lose to UCLA, ASU, Zona, and Oregon, then the sky is falling and we will likely suck forever -
Damone is a panicky little bitch. HTH.EsophagealFeces said:What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
-
Actually, I'm not.allpurpleallgold said:
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.MikeDamone said:
Bowl win (assumed).allpurpleallgold said:5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no
Oregon - no
UCLA - no
Az - maybe, but history on the road says no
WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up
-
All this said...I need to give the classic HHB line "I hope I'm wrong and petersen runs the table".
-
That's for the bigger picture. I'm just talking about this year.allpurpleallgold said:
Damone is a panicky little bitch. HTH.EsophagealFeces said:What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
Have I mentioned how they win or lose matters? I was never more optimistic about UW football than after the 1990 loss to Colorado.
HTH. -
Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.allpurpleallgold said:
The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked. -
Are you fucking retarded?MikeDamone said:
Actually, I'm not.allpurpleallgold said:
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.MikeDamone said:
Bowl win (assumed).allpurpleallgold said:5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no
Oregon - no
UCLA - no
Az - maybe, but history on the road says no
WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up -
Beat Oregon. Nothing else matters.
Possibly true this year. A lot of fans,players, and recruits would buy in and work harder than ever
We need to change the mojo. iDawg and I were concerned in 2007 that losing would become permanent here. Its easier to go from good to bad than to get back -
Perhaps.allpurpleallgold said:
Are you fucking retarded?MikeDamone said:
Actually, I'm not.allpurpleallgold said:
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.MikeDamone said:
Bowl win (assumed).allpurpleallgold said:5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no
Oregon - no
UCLA - no
Az - maybe, but history on the road says no
WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up
Have you watched any of the last 5 games?
