I mean….his policies didn't. The inflation is coming from the 10-15 year span of free money finally catching up to everyone.
Trump wants to be able to set those interest rates himself. THAT will cause inflation again, but outside his term since he doesn't care about long term effects.
Oh man, I cant wait to see what Twitter/X replies with.
The Supreme Court opinion states that none of the states and individuals who brought the suit could connect government communications about social media posts to actions taken against them.
Barrett wrote that the plaintiffs could not make a connection between government communication and moderation decisions, treated “the government” as a monolithic entity and frequently confused the timeline.
“But they fail, by and large, to link their past social-media restrictions to the defendants’ communications with the platforms,” Barrett wrote.
The plaintiffs tried to use as evidence government communications with social media companies that happened after blocking decisions against them, or government communications with a different social media company, Barrett wrote.
"But the gubment!", screeched the plaintiffs, Gasbag, and the other girls.
Comments
That misses the point completely
Good job
The same people that said Biden wouldn't cause inflation that he in fact did cause say Trump’s mythical future policies will cause inflation
worst inflation since Carter under Biden
Try again
Things fascists say
Once again my argument is untouched
Another white flag
I mean….his policies didn't. The inflation is coming from the 10-15 year span of free money finally catching up to everyone.
Trump wants to be able to set those interest rates himself. THAT will cause inflation again, but outside his term since he doesn't care about long term effects.
Oh man, I cant wait to see what Twitter/X replies with.
What did they say about WAPO, NYT, nbc, cbs, cnn, abc, la times, msnbc, etc. etc?
Bucky blaming Trump
Yawn
I guess the experts know their audience
Morons
Yet when they looked . . .
The Supreme Court opinion states that none of the states and individuals who brought the suit could connect government communications about social media posts to actions taken against them.
Barrett wrote that the plaintiffs could not make a connection between government communication and moderation decisions, treated “the government” as a monolithic entity and frequently confused the timeline.
“But they fail, by and large, to link their past social-media restrictions to the defendants’ communications with the platforms,” Barrett wrote.
The plaintiffs tried to use as evidence government communications with social media companies that happened after blocking decisions against them, or government communications with a different social media company, Barrett wrote.
"But the gubment!", screeched the plaintiffs, Gasbag, and the other girls.
Did your Brownshirt get extra starch today?
.
Wheres my money?
The government is only doing a little censorship
I don't answer dumb fucks. You are a gargantuan dumb fuck.
Just the tip.
Where’s the proof?
.
Lol
Antifa maaaaannnn
Advanced topics like the Fed setting mortgage rates?