Supreme Court allows for disinformation to be removed from Social Media
Comments
-
NEW: Jonathan Turley shreds the Supreme Court's decision to allow the U.S. government to demand the removal of 'misinformation' on social media.
The Supreme Court ruled that the government’s communications with social media giants about removing Covid-19 "misinformation" did not violate the First Amendment.
"This is one of the most fundamental issues that we are facing."
"It's been called Orwellian by lower court judges. And what the court is saying is that we won't hear you on this issue 'cause you're not the right litigants."
"I testified about this in Congress, that they have made a mockery of the limits of the First Amendment by doing indirectly what they're barred from doing directly."
-
So are Democrats still whining about expanding SCOTUS, or does that take a break until the next “wrong” decision because they ruled in favor of Fascism this time?
-
There's been harassment of various sorts for years
-
We didn't assume anything. You should read up on Hunter's laptop. You should read up on the governments interaction with Facebook and Twitter. That's why we have trials, to prove the facts as alleged. When you assume the facts are false, then you don't need a trial which is what happened.
-
Oh, what a give away. Did you hear that, did you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about -- did you see him repressing me, you saw it didn't you?
-
No habla gibberish.
-
This was expected red meat served up on Wednesday to offset what is coming on Friday on a couple of cases. DefiantL's is gonna have a busy weekend.
-
you're too modest, surely, Shirley
-
Except trials in the Southern District of New York, those ones are always fixed and rigged.
-
Experts
