NEW: Jonathan Turley shreds the Supreme Court's decision to allow the U.S. government to demand the removal of 'misinformation' on social media.
The Supreme Court ruled that the government’s communications with social media giants about removing Covid-19 "misinformation" did not violate the First Amendment.
"This is one of the most fundamental issues that we are facing."
"It's been called Orwellian by lower court judges. And what the court is saying is that we won't hear you on this issue 'cause you're not the right litigants."
"I testified about this in Congress, that they have made a mockery of the limits of the First Amendment by doing indirectly what they're barred from doing directly."
So are Democrats still whining about expanding SCOTUS, or does that take a break until the next “wrong” decision because they ruled in favor of Fascism this time?
We didn't assume anything. You should read up on Hunter's laptop. You should read up on the governments interaction with Facebook and Twitter. That's why we have trials, to prove the facts as alleged. When you assume the facts are false, then you don't need a trial which is what happened.
Wanna know how its disinformation? Because we have idiots like Sledog that repeat what they hear on Twitter and when I ask follow up questions, he has no clue about the subject. Which leads me to believe he and Race can't form their own opinions, theyre reliant on other people to tell them what to think!!
The “Legal Expenses” Clown Show wasn’t in federal court, Einstein. The DOJ and FEC found nothing to prosecute at the federal level.
So, the Biden DOJ sent in Micheal Colangelo to piece together a case to avoid the statute of limitation for a state crime by making up a federal conviction that never happened in the real world.
But the plaintiffs “cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves [self-censorship] based on their fears of hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending."
Translation: Amy says we can't hand you an injunction just because you're a Right Wing fraidy cat.
No no no, i'll go straight to the Twitter/X source directly and dispute THEIR opinions. Why go through a middleman like yourself who isn't doing the thinking.
Simple, Trump had a hand in this himself. Pressuring the FED and Jerome Powell to reverse course on raising interest rates 7-8 years ago and lowering them instead in a hot economy is part of that 9.1 % increase. Biden's policies themselves aren't to blame. Blame the previous 10 -15 years of free money.
I don't want to talk advanced topics with you. It'll take too long, you'll go to this guy's X account and wait for the rebutal so you can pose it as your own thought.
If you don't look for harm you won't find it. Trump was harmed by the censorship and lies coordinated by Blinken about Hunter's laptop. Not hard to find someone harmed by their doctor's refusal to prescribe ivermectin based on Fow Chee, the CDC and FDA lying about it and getting social media to censor "disinformation". The leftard position is accordingly that the government can threaten media platforms if they don't suppress free speech, which they did, and there is no remedy available. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
Comments
NEW: Jonathan Turley shreds the Supreme Court's decision to allow the U.S. government to demand the removal of 'misinformation' on social media.
The Supreme Court ruled that the government’s communications with social media giants about removing Covid-19 "misinformation" did not violate the First Amendment.
"This is one of the most fundamental issues that we are facing."
"It's been called Orwellian by lower court judges. And what the court is saying is that we won't hear you on this issue 'cause you're not the right litigants."
"I testified about this in Congress, that they have made a mockery of the limits of the First Amendment by doing indirectly what they're barred from doing directly."
So are Democrats still whining about expanding SCOTUS, or does that take a break until the next “wrong” decision because they ruled in favor of Fascism this time?
There's been harassment of various sorts for years
We didn't assume anything. You should read up on Hunter's laptop. You should read up on the governments interaction with Facebook and Twitter. That's why we have trials, to prove the facts as alleged. When you assume the facts are false, then you don't need a trial which is what happened.
Oh, what a give away. Did you hear that, did you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about -- did you see him repressing me, you saw it didn't you?
No habla gibberish.
This was expected red meat served up on Wednesday to offset what is coming on Friday on a couple of cases. DefiantL's is gonna have a busy weekend.
you're too modest, surely, Shirley
Except trials in the Southern District of New York, those ones are always fixed and rigged.
Experts
Wanna know how its disinformation? Because we have idiots like Sledog that repeat what they hear on Twitter and when I ask follow up questions, he has no clue about the subject. Which leads me to believe he and Race can't form their own opinions, theyre reliant on other people to tell them what to think!!
The “Legal Expenses” Clown Show wasn’t in federal court, Einstein. The DOJ and FEC found nothing to prosecute at the federal level.
So, the Biden DOJ sent in Micheal Colangelo to piece together a case to avoid the statute of limitation for a state crime by making up a federal conviction that never happened in the real world.
Why are you here, Dumbshit?
You calling someone an idiot is rich
You have yet to refute anything I've posted
Attacking the source is a white flag
It's proven that we were right and government boot lickers like you were wrong
Slither away boy
Care to refute this bucky?
But the plaintiffs “cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves [self-censorship] based on their fears of hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending."
Translation: Amy says we can't hand you an injunction just because you're a Right Wing fraidy cat.
No no no, i'll go straight to the Twitter/X source directly and dispute THEIR opinions. Why go through a middleman like yourself who isn't doing the thinking.
Government threatens you and you can't claim harm
Things fascists say
Simple, Trump had a hand in this himself. Pressuring the FED and Jerome Powell to reverse course on raising interest rates 7-8 years ago and lowering them instead in a hot economy is part of that 9.1 % increase. Biden's policies themselves aren't to blame. Blame the previous 10 -15 years of free money.
I don't want to talk advanced topics with you. It'll take too long, you'll go to this guy's X account and wait for the rebutal so you can pose it as your own thought.
When you're a big pussy, everything looks like a threat.
If you don't look for harm you won't find it. Trump was harmed by the censorship and lies coordinated by Blinken about Hunter's laptop. Not hard to find someone harmed by their doctor's refusal to prescribe ivermectin based on Fow Chee, the CDC and FDA lying about it and getting social media to censor "disinformation". The leftard position is accordingly that the government can threaten media platforms if they don't suppress free speech, which they did, and there is no remedy available. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.