Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Supreme Court allows for disinformation to be removed from Social Media
HuskyBuck
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,698 
Good on them. Stop allowing the Ruskies from brainwashing folks on this board. Hey Race where you going to get your opinions and rebuttals going forward???
This has no effect on EverettChris. That man is so dumb he couldn’t read those posts anyway.
Comments
Fuck off fascist
The censorship of ”Disinformation” as suggested (or we will fuck with your company if you don’t do it) by the federal government is exactly what Fascists like @HuskyBuck support.
Awesome news for anti-1st Amendment people like the Retard OP.
No wonder why you guys can’t stand court findings and are shocked when those “facts” don’t hold up in court ever.
You like absorbing the garbage that the Ruskies feed you. That’s your idea of “critical analysis”. Ain’t that right comrades??
Russia! Russia! Russia!
Rolling out that wishbone again.
Don't blow a gasket, Olga.
Don’t you have a new hoax to fall for?
lol
51 intelligence officers agree that the laptop was fake too. NY Post got banned from Twitter for reporting on it
DISINFORMATION MAN
Here's some more bullshit
Reignite? JFC
That was the acceptable kind of censorship for Fascists such at the Retard OP called @HuskyBuck. It kept voters from knowing information that could harm the election chances of Deep State Joe.
Even though it was the truth and the totalitarian government was lying to suppress the truth. That’s all good with followers.
Only government sponsored misinformation is allowable misinformation
The diary is a fake-
More whataboutism I would guess.
Can men become women?
Let me know the information on that
I wondered why you didn't provide a link. So I went to read up on the story. You left key details out.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jun/26/supreme-court-decision-social-media-misinformation
Once again the Supreme Court decides that the American people have no standing to sue over federal government actions. So, who does? No official decision allowing the censorship but a de facto decision allowing censorship. Apparently, no one has legal recourse to object to the the censorship. I get the leftard twinks on the Court approve of the censorship, but Roberts, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett are beyond being disappointments.
When you assume the very thing you were required to prove, i.e., censorship, the argument gets so much easier to make.
You were invited to drop out of law school, weren't you, Gasbag?
You’re just a big bunch of Worthless, Bob Bloblaw.
With this administration and DOJ, it’s a given your company will be harassed by Government Goons if you don’t comply with their requests.
Ain’t Fascism awesome!
Imagine claiming that the government telling what can or can't be printed isn't censorship
H fucking stupid
His claim is that the companies aren’t overtly being forced to do it.
Because he’s fucking stupid is basically that reason.
The government only “asked” companies to jab the shit out of their employees too