Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Precedent
Comments
-
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.HHusky said:
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.Goduckies said:
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebukingHHusky said:
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.Sources said:
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kidHHusky said:I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits. -
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".Sledog said:
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.HHusky said:
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.Goduckies said:
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebukingHHusky said:
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.Sources said:
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kidHHusky said:I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits. -
Is that the whole ammendment?HHusky said:
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".Sledog said:
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.HHusky said:
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.Goduckies said:
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebukingHHusky said:
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.Sources said:
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kidHHusky said:I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
I see
Shall not infringe
Fascists like yourself don't really care about the constitution -
Same old commie dodge. It's meaning at the time was "well trained". Not controlled. The founders will tell you but you'd have to look up what they said.HHusky said:
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".Sledog said:
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.HHusky said:
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.Goduckies said:
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebukingHHusky said:
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.Sources said:
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kidHHusky said:I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
Commies don't do that because they know it's a loser for them. But then your mythical MBA from Dewey, Cheatum and Howe University is proudly displayed in your trailer. -
They just keep coming with the lies and bullshitSledog said:
Same old commie dodge. It's meaning at the time was "well trained". Not controlled. The founders will tell you but you'd have to look up what they said.HHusky said:
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".Sledog said:
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.HHusky said:
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.Goduckies said:
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebukingHHusky said:
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.Sources said:
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kidHHusky said:I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
Commies don't do that because they know it's a loser for them. But then your mythical MBA from Dewey, Cheatum and Howe University is proudly displayed in your trailer.
Sociopaths -
That's not how Scalia dodged it. Learn your Right Wing narratives.Sledog said:
Same old commie dodge. It's meaning at the time was "well trained". Not controlled. The founders will tell you but you'd have to look up what they said.HHusky said:
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".Sledog said:
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.HHusky said:
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.Goduckies said:
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebukingHHusky said:
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.Sources said:
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kidHHusky said:I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
Commies don't do that because they know it's a loser for them. But then your mythical MBA from Dewey, Cheatum and Howe University is proudly displayed in your trailer. -
See?
-
Scalia's pillow says hiHHusky said:
That's not how Scalia dodged it. Learn your Right Wing narratives.Sledog said:
Same old commie dodge. It's meaning at the time was "well trained". Not controlled. The founders will tell you but you'd have to look up what they said.HHusky said:
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".Sledog said:
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.HHusky said:
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.Goduckies said:
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebukingHHusky said:
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.Sources said:
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kidHHusky said:I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
Commies don't do that because they know it's a loser for them. But then your mythical MBA from Dewey, Cheatum and Howe University is proudly displayed in your trailer. -
-
The Colorado Supreme Court already drew Daddy a roadmap for how to remain on the primary ballot. You fake outrage girls are amusing.
