I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kid
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebuking
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.
I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kid
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebuking
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".
I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kid
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebuking
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".
Is that the whole ammendment?
I see
Shall not infringe
Fascists like yourself don't really care about the constitution
I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kid
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebuking
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".
Same old commie dodge. It's meaning at the time was "well trained". Not controlled. The founders will tell you but you'd have to look up what they said. Commies don't do that because they know it's a loser for them. But then your mythical MBA from Dewey, Cheatum and Howe University is proudly displayed in your trailer.
I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kid
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebuking
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".
Same old commie dodge. It's meaning at the time was "well trained". Not controlled. The founders will tell you but you'd have to look up what they said. Commies don't do that because they know it's a loser for them. But then your mythical MBA from Dewey, Cheatum and Howe University is proudly displayed in your trailer.
I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kid
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebuking
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".
Same old commie dodge. It's meaning at the time was "well trained". Not controlled. The founders will tell you but you'd have to look up what they said. Commies don't do that because they know it's a loser for them. But then your mythical MBA from Dewey, Cheatum and Howe University is proudly displayed in your trailer.
That's not how Scalia dodged it. Learn your Right Wing narratives.
I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kid
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebuking
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".
Same old commie dodge. It's meaning at the time was "well trained". Not controlled. The founders will tell you but you'd have to look up what they said. Commies don't do that because they know it's a loser for them. But then your mythical MBA from Dewey, Cheatum and Howe University is proudly displayed in your trailer.
That's not how Scalia dodged it. Learn your Right Wing narratives.
The Colorado Supreme Court already drew Daddy a roadmap for how to remain on the primary ballot. You fake outrage girls are amusing.
This Colorado thing aside, why do you think Jack Smith didn't charge Trump with insurrection?
Faced with a beyond a reasonable doubt burden of proof, prosecutors pick and choose what to charge all the time. Abe Lincoln's advised lawyers not to plead everything they possibly can, and most of us try to adhere to that.
I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kid
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebuking
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits.
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".
We've been through this how many times? How many times you gonna drag out the same tired lies? Someone wanna bump the thread where we littered H's corpse with quotes from the founders?
Comments
I see
Shall not infringe
Fascists like yourself don't really care about the constitution
Commies don't do that because they know it's a loser for them. But then your mythical MBA from Dewey, Cheatum and Howe University is proudly displayed in your trailer.
Sociopaths
H once again
Sweet victory!
congrats
Sweet victory indeed