How will we ever beat Mighty Tejas?

backthepack

haie said:

Dahobbs said:

haie said:

Dahobbs said:

haie said:

SECDAWG said:

I’ll say it again, THIS TX team ain’t last years. Many of y’all seem to be looking ahead at Bama/Michigan. This TX front 7 is going to stop DJ like none this year and put pressure on Penix like none this year.

WA OL is going to win or lose this game. It won’t be Penix, DJ or the Receivers. IF they can protect and open holes on this TX front, they’ll have a chance.

I’m not shitting, pods. They front 7 on TX is very legit, esp the two DL tackles.

This won’t be a who can outscore who game in the 45-50 point range. The LOS is going to be huge here. That’s where folks are going to get beat the fuck up. No finesse. TX has found some physicality they haven’t had in a long time. I’m not saying TX is GOING to win, don’t twist, but this will be WA most physical game of the year, bar none.

It's the same roster as the Alamo with the same head coach who has a history of not developing anyone, but still.

Just to add context to my previous post, players who will start or see significant minutes and did not play in the Alamo Bowl

WR Adonai Mitchell (2nd on team with 813 yards receiving, 15.9 avg, 10 TDs)
LB Anthony Hill Jr (2nd on team with 63 tackles, 5 sacks)
RB CJ Baxter (595 yards rushing, 4 TDs)
RB Jaydon Blue (339 yards rushing, 6.1 avg, 3 TDs)
S Derek Williams JR (38 tackles)
DB Malik Muhammad (29 tackles, 4 deflections, 1 int) (freshman corner that got increased minutes until being a starter in the Big 12 title game, I believe cousin to Jabbar)

We also had a number of freshman and sophomores who played in the Alamo Bowl, but have improved greatly since, including most of the offensive line.

Man those all look like real difference makers.

They are. The two that are most impactful are Mitchell and Hill. Those are two future NFLers and the guys that played in their place last year were below JAG level. Just like having McMillan opens up your offense, having Mitchell really opens up ours. CJ Baxter and Jaydon Blue have filled nicely for Brooks since his injury, which is why their rushing totals are lower. Baxter is a bigger back and Blue will be the second fastest person on the field after Worthy.

Mitchell played a bunch in the bowl game last year as I remember him and he's shown on the replay a bunch.

He wasn't a difference maker in the game.

He transferred from UGA retard

haie

backthepack said:

haie said:

Dahobbs said:

haie said:

Dahobbs said:

haie said:

SECDAWG said:

I’ll say it again, THIS TX team ain’t last years. Many of y’all seem to be looking ahead at Bama/Michigan. This TX front 7 is going to stop DJ like none this year and put pressure on Penix like none this year.

WA OL is going to win or lose this game. It won’t be Penix, DJ or the Receivers. IF they can protect and open holes on this TX front, they’ll have a chance.

I’m not shitting, pods. They front 7 on TX is very legit, esp the two DL tackles.

This won’t be a who can outscore who game in the 45-50 point range. The LOS is going to be huge here. That’s where folks are going to get beat the fuck up. No finesse. TX has found some physicality they haven’t had in a long time. I’m not saying TX is GOING to win, don’t twist, but this will be WA most physical game of the year, bar none.

It's the same roster as the Alamo with the same head coach who has a history of not developing anyone, but still.

Just to add context to my previous post, players who will start or see significant minutes and did not play in the Alamo Bowl

WR Adonai Mitchell (2nd on team with 813 yards receiving, 15.9 avg, 10 TDs)
LB Anthony Hill Jr (2nd on team with 63 tackles, 5 sacks)
RB CJ Baxter (595 yards rushing, 4 TDs)
RB Jaydon Blue (339 yards rushing, 6.1 avg, 3 TDs)
S Derek Williams JR (38 tackles)
DB Malik Muhammad (29 tackles, 4 deflections, 1 int) (freshman corner that got increased minutes until being a starter in the Big 12 title game, I believe cousin to Jabbar)

We also had a number of freshman and sophomores who played in the Alamo Bowl, but have improved greatly since, including most of the offensive line.

Man those all look like real difference makers.

They are. The two that are most impactful are Mitchell and Hill. Those are two future NFLers and the guys that played in their place last year were below JAG level. Just like having McMillan opens up your offense, having Mitchell really opens up ours. CJ Baxter and Jaydon Blue have filled nicely for Brooks since his injury, which is why their rushing totals are lower. Baxter is a bigger back and Blue will be the second fastest person on the field after Worthy.

Mitchell played a bunch in the bowl game last year as I remember him and he's shown on the replay a bunch.

He wasn't a difference maker in the game.

He transferred from UGA retard

You think I follow the truck stop leagues?

My bad.

Fuck off.

TheHB

Texas beat Bama when all Bama could do is run the ball. Milroe was nothing like the QB he is today.

Texas has faced nothing like UW’s offense.

UW has faced better offenses than Texas.

Prove me wrong.

ntxduck

backthepack said:

haie said:

Dahobbs said:

haie said:

Dahobbs said:

haie said:

SECDAWG said:

I’ll say it again, THIS TX team ain’t last years. Many of y’all seem to be looking ahead at Bama/Michigan. This TX front 7 is going to stop DJ like none this year and put pressure on Penix like none this year.

WA OL is going to win or lose this game. It won’t be Penix, DJ or the Receivers. IF they can protect and open holes on this TX front, they’ll have a chance.

I’m not shitting, pods. They front 7 on TX is very legit, esp the two DL tackles.

This won’t be a who can outscore who game in the 45-50 point range. The LOS is going to be huge here. That’s where folks are going to get beat the fuck up. No finesse. TX has found some physicality they haven’t had in a long time. I’m not saying TX is GOING to win, don’t twist, but this will be WA most physical game of the year, bar none.

It's the same roster as the Alamo with the same head coach who has a history of not developing anyone, but still.

Just to add context to my previous post, players who will start or see significant minutes and did not play in the Alamo Bowl

WR Adonai Mitchell (2nd on team with 813 yards receiving, 15.9 avg, 10 TDs)
LB Anthony Hill Jr (2nd on team with 63 tackles, 5 sacks)
RB CJ Baxter (595 yards rushing, 4 TDs)
RB Jaydon Blue (339 yards rushing, 6.1 avg, 3 TDs)
S Derek Williams JR (38 tackles)
DB Malik Muhammad (29 tackles, 4 deflections, 1 int) (freshman corner that got increased minutes until being a starter in the Big 12 title game, I believe cousin to Jabbar)

We also had a number of freshman and sophomores who played in the Alamo Bowl, but have improved greatly since, including most of the offensive line.

Man those all look like real difference makers.

They are. The two that are most impactful are Mitchell and Hill. Those are two future NFLers and the guys that played in their place last year were below JAG level. Just like having McMillan opens up your offense, having Mitchell really opens up ours. CJ Baxter and Jaydon Blue have filled nicely for Brooks since his injury, which is why their rushing totals are lower. Baxter is a bigger back and Blue will be the second fastest person on the field after Worthy.

Mitchell played a bunch in the bowl game last year as I remember him and he's shown on the replay a bunch.

He wasn't a difference maker in the game.

He transferred from UGA retard

Baruch atah adonaiiii

FireCohen

Mitch_Cumsteen said:

RaceBannon said:

RTD said:

For all the newbies from Texas. Sark was ours? first. His fall to the top has been exquisite like a (DDY4's) teen bois hips. He's known as 7 Win Sark for a reason and his crowning achievement happened in the Ram, and is known as The Tosh Day massacre. If you're confused, you should consider pm'ing @String.

We're also not impressed with recruiting or stars because we're neighbors with Oregon

We aren't impressed with recruiting stars, either. Trust me, no one has seen more 4 and 5 star recruits bust than Texas. The track record is absolutely jaw dropping. Texas makes Oregon look like a bunch of scrappy overachievers.

USC and Tejas are equals when it comes to pissing away 4 and 5 star talent

PurpleBaze

ntxduck said:

backthepack said:

haie said:

Dahobbs said:

haie said:

Dahobbs said:

haie said:

SECDAWG said:

I’ll say it again, THIS TX team ain’t last years. Many of y’all seem to be looking ahead at Bama/Michigan. This TX front 7 is going to stop DJ like none this year and put pressure on Penix like none this year.

WA OL is going to win or lose this game. It won’t be Penix, DJ or the Receivers. IF they can protect and open holes on this TX front, they’ll have a chance.

I’m not shitting, pods. They front 7 on TX is very legit, esp the two DL tackles.

This won’t be a who can outscore who game in the 45-50 point range. The LOS is going to be huge here. That’s where folks are going to get beat the fuck up. No finesse. TX has found some physicality they haven’t had in a long time. I’m not saying TX is GOING to win, don’t twist, but this will be WA most physical game of the year, bar none.

It's the same roster as the Alamo with the same head coach who has a history of not developing anyone, but still.

Just to add context to my previous post, players who will start or see significant minutes and did not play in the Alamo Bowl

WR Adonai Mitchell (2nd on team with 813 yards receiving, 15.9 avg, 10 TDs)
LB Anthony Hill Jr (2nd on team with 63 tackles, 5 sacks)
RB CJ Baxter (595 yards rushing, 4 TDs)
RB Jaydon Blue (339 yards rushing, 6.1 avg, 3 TDs)
S Derek Williams JR (38 tackles)
DB Malik Muhammad (29 tackles, 4 deflections, 1 int) (freshman corner that got increased minutes until being a starter in the Big 12 title game, I believe cousin to Jabbar)

We also had a number of freshman and sophomores who played in the Alamo Bowl, but have improved greatly since, including most of the offensive line.

Man those all look like real difference makers.

They are. The two that are most impactful are Mitchell and Hill. Those are two future NFLers and the guys that played in their place last year were below JAG level. Just like having McMillan opens up your offense, having Mitchell really opens up ours. CJ Baxter and Jaydon Blue have filled nicely for Brooks since his injury, which is why their rushing totals are lower. Baxter is a bigger back and Blue will be the second fastest person on the field after Worthy.

Mitchell played a bunch in the bowl game last year as I remember him and he's shown on the replay a bunch.

He wasn't a difference maker in the game.

He transferred from UGA retard

Baruch atah adonaiiii

HH is no place for sermon seekers.

Dahobbs

TheHB said:

Texas beat Bama when all Bama could do is run the ball. Milroe was nothing like the QB he is today.

Texas has faced nothing like UW’s offense.

UW has faced better offenses than Texas.

Prove me wrong.

Eh, Milroe looked exactly the same later in the season as he did in our game. His QB rating was pretty consistent too across all those games (lower against better competition). He has a beautiful deep ball, but struggles with intermediate passing. From a total yardage standpoint, you've faced exactly one offense higher ranked than Texas, Oregon.

UW Opps - Oregon (#2), USC (#11), Zona (#18), Boise (#24), Or St (#32), Wash St (#41), UCLA (#43), Cal (#56), Tulsa (#63), Utah (#84), Stanford (#92), ASU (#109), MSU (#125)

TX Opps - OU (#5), TCU (#13), Kans St (#23), Kansas (#28), Ok St (#42), Bama (#53), TTech (#61), Baylor (#70), Rice (#71), Houston (#83), Iowa St (#86), Wyo (#108), BYU (#118).

Looks fairly comparable to me, with Washington facing slightly higher ranked offenses on average.

For reference, Texas is #9 and Washington is #12 for total offense.

TheHB

Dahobbs said:

TheHB said:

Texas beat Bama when all Bama could do is run the ball. Milroe was nothing like the QB he is today.

Texas has faced nothing like UW’s offense.

UW has faced better offenses than Texas.

Prove me wrong.

Eh, Milroe looked exactly the same later in the season as he did in our game. His QB rating was pretty consistent too across all those games (lower against better competition). He has a beautiful deep ball, but struggles with intermediate passing. From a total yardage standpoint, you've faced exactly one offense higher ranked than Texas, Oregon.

UW Opps - Oregon (#2), USC (#11), Zona (#18), Boise (#24), Or St (#32), Wash St (#41), UCLA (#43), Cal (#56), Tulsa (#63), Utah (#84), Stanford (#92), ASU (#109), MSU (#125)

TX Opps - OU (#5), TCU (#13), Kans St (#23), Kansas (#28), Ok St (#42), Bama (#53), TTech (#61), Baylor (#70), Rice (#71), Houston (#83), Iowa St (#86), Wyo (#108), BYU (#118).

Looks fairly comparable to me, with Washington facing slightly higher ranked offenses on average.

For reference, Texas is #9 and Washington is #12 for total offense.

And UW beat Oregon twice.

Dahobbs

And Oregon average 452 yards of offense in those two games.

TheHB said:

Dahobbs said:

TheHB said:

Texas beat Bama when all Bama could do is run the ball. Milroe was nothing like the QB he is today.

Texas has faced nothing like UW’s offense.

UW has faced better offenses than Texas.

Prove me wrong.

Eh, Milroe looked exactly the same later in the season as he did in our game. His QB rating was pretty consistent too across all those games (lower against better competition). He has a beautiful deep ball, but struggles with intermediate passing. From a total yardage standpoint, you've faced exactly one offense higher ranked than Texas, Oregon.

UW Opps - Oregon (#2), USC (#11), Zona (#18), Boise (#24), Or St (#32), Wash St (#41), UCLA (#43), Cal (#56), Tulsa (#63), Utah (#84), Stanford (#92), ASU (#109), MSU (#125)

TX Opps - OU (#5), TCU (#13), Kans St (#23), Kansas (#28), Ok St (#42), Bama (#53), TTech (#61), Baylor (#70), Rice (#71), Houston (#83), Iowa St (#86), Wyo (#108), BYU (#118).

Looks fairly comparable to me, with Washington facing slightly higher ranked offenses on average.

For reference, Texas is #9 and Washington is #12 for total offense.

And UW beat Oregon twice.

Sure. Washington is a good team. Never said otherwise.

Canadawg

Dahobbs said:

TheHB said:

Texas beat Bama when all Bama could do is run the ball. Milroe was nothing like the QB he is today.

Texas has faced nothing like UW’s offense.

UW has faced better offenses than Texas.

Prove me wrong.

Eh, Milroe looked exactly the same later in the season as he did in our game. His QB rating was pretty consistent too across all those games (lower against better competition). He has a beautiful deep ball, but struggles with intermediate passing. From a total yardage standpoint, you've faced exactly one offense higher ranked than Texas, Oregon.

UW Opps - Oregon (#2), USC (#11), Zona (#18), Boise (#24), Or St (#32), Wash St (#41), UCLA (#43), Cal (#56), Tulsa (#63), Utah (#84), Stanford (#92), ASU (#109), MSU (#125)

TX Opps - OU (#5), TCU (#13), Kans St (#23), Kansas (#28), Ok St (#42), Bama (#53), TTech (#61), Baylor (#70), Rice (#71), Houston (#83), Iowa St (#86), Wyo (#108), BYU (#118).

Looks fairly comparable to me, with Washington facing slightly higher ranked offenses on average.

For reference, Texas is #9 and Washington is #12 for total offense.

You would trade your offense, 3 fingers, your sister and a bottle of vino for our offense. And you'd thank us after.