Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Grinolds letting Peterman have it re: TBS
bananasnblondes
Member Posts: 15,423
Apparently Peterman's recruitment of local players is a major reason for alarm.
In the (paraphrased) words of Kimmy:
What happened?
Joyner? Throckmorton? Eason? All these guys were heavy UW leans and if you told me a year ago that Petersen would lose all 3 I would not have believed you. You have to ask why is he losing these local players that wanted to come to UW?
At this point, the previous staff's local recruiting woes are brought up, and of course, according to Kim, it's apples and oranges:
First of all, recruiting locally now is way different than it was 3 years ago. Sark came into a much different situation than Petersen.
Banner - Sark wanted him but there were some major red flags there
Garnett - Wanted Stanford's academics, no loss by Sark
Williams - Wasn't good enough. The staff would not take his commitment
Jack - academic issues. loved Mora. not Sark's fault. In fact, heard rumors that Jack really loved the UW staff under Sark but just felt more comfortable with Mora because he knew him longer
As you can see, there were perfectly goo explanations of why these kids went elsewhere. But with Joyner, Throckmorton, and Eason, some serious questions need to be asked, according to Kim
Seriously Woodward, get this fucking clown away from the program
-bananaboat
In the (paraphrased) words of Kimmy:
What happened?
Joyner? Throckmorton? Eason? All these guys were heavy UW leans and if you told me a year ago that Petersen would lose all 3 I would not have believed you. You have to ask why is he losing these local players that wanted to come to UW?
At this point, the previous staff's local recruiting woes are brought up, and of course, according to Kim, it's apples and oranges:
First of all, recruiting locally now is way different than it was 3 years ago. Sark came into a much different situation than Petersen.
Banner - Sark wanted him but there were some major red flags there
Garnett - Wanted Stanford's academics, no loss by Sark
Williams - Wasn't good enough. The staff would not take his commitment
Jack - academic issues. loved Mora. not Sark's fault. In fact, heard rumors that Jack really loved the UW staff under Sark but just felt more comfortable with Mora because he knew him longer
As you can see, there were perfectly goo explanations of why these kids went elsewhere. But with Joyner, Throckmorton, and Eason, some serious questions need to be asked, according to Kim
Seriously Woodward, get this fucking clown away from the program
-bananaboat
Comments
and the hypocrisy of him calling out Petersen's recruiting, when for years he would viciously slander anyone who questioned Sark's recruiting, is sickening.
As far as Baker goes clearly just another idiot.
.... Also remember how Kim went on a rant last summer talking about Jacks poor academics and how soft he looked when he saw him helping out at a camp.
Kimmy and Ektard are straight up idiots while Fetters at least has some knowledge ... F3's undoing is his arrogance, love for the zoccer and the fact that there is no reasonable explanation for someone to be that obese.
Kim wants Petersen to fail so he can be right.
Side note: I know some of you, (cough Tequilla cough) are poo pooing Eason committing elsewhere, but in general, it's never a good idea to lose a top ranked local QB with offers from almost every elite program. Say what you want, but getting commits from guys like that sets a tone for the program.
Who knows with Joyner. If UW goes 11-3 and WSU goes 5-7, you have to like UW's chances if Peterman really wants him. Recruits don't typically choose WSU over UW.
Thockmorton is the most likely goner. I wish we got him, but it's probably not the end of the world. The season needs to start so we stop talking TBS before January and February, which is the only time it really matters.
Apparently this doesn't apply anymore.