Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pac-12 Power Rankings Week Four

123468

Comments

  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,443
    edited September 2023
    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, but they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    DucksFC said:

    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, while Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).

    Game will be decided by QB play. Let’s see who shits the bed first.
    If Rome/McMillan/Polk are healthy not sure there is a defense in this country can stop them
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,443
    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, while Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).

    Game will be decided by QB play. Let’s see who shits the bed first.
    If Rome/McMillan/Polk are healthy not sure there is a defense in this country can stop them
    agreed. If our DBs can actually handle them I'll probably go full Quook because that would be one hell of an accomplishment.

    the QB duel will be legendary.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    DucksFC said:

    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, while Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).

    Game will be decided by QB play. Let’s see who shits the bed first.
    If Rome/McMillan/Polk are healthy not sure there is a defense in this country can stop them
    agreed. If our DBs can actually handle them I'll probably go full Quook because that would be one hell of an accomplishment.

    the QB duel will be legendary.
    If your DB room can handle them… then that is best DB room in the country…no question. Cal game could have been far worse if McMillan was healthy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,443
    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, while Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).

    Game will be decided by QB play. Let’s see who shits the bed first.
    If Rome/McMillan/Polk are healthy not sure there is a defense in this country can stop them
    agreed. If our DBs can actually handle them I'll probably go full Quook because that would be one hell of an accomplishment.

    the QB duel will be legendary.
    If your DB room can handle them… then that is best DB room in the country…no question. Cal game could have been far worse if McMillan was healthy
    Jackson/Florence are very good. They completely shut down Shedeur and Colorado's receivers. But UW is a far bigger task. Also they need to stay healthy because Bridges is mid, Manning is trash and the freshmen are too young.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    DucksFC said:

    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, while Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).

    Game will be decided by QB play. Let’s see who shits the bed first.
    If Rome/McMillan/Polk are healthy not sure there is a defense in this country can stop them
    agreed. If our DBs can actually handle them I'll probably go full Quook because that would be one hell of an accomplishment.

    the QB duel will be legendary.
    If your DB room can handle them… then that is best DB room in the country…no question. Cal game could have been far worse if McMillan was healthy
    Jackson/Florence are very good. They completely shut down Shedeur and Colorado's receivers. But UW is a far bigger task. Also they need to stay healthy because Bridges is mid, Manning is trash and the freshmen are too young.
    Not sure you can even compare WR rooms, caz hunter was out. But OL at Colorado is not great, not saying UW is amazing but significantly better. Hopefully both teams win and we have 2 weeks to talk shit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    Colorado does not have a “good offense”.

    That team is shit. Both lines are garbage. TCU isn’t a good team… I will say that was still a good win for Colorado though as I thought they had no chance.

    Then they beat a perennial shitty Nebraska team whom I’m certain had averaged 4 points a game for a decade.

    Good statement game by Oregon but Colorado is really bad.

    That being said this sets up a perfect upset against USC at home.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,723 Standard Supporter
    CuntWaffle said:

    Colorado does not have a “good offense”.

    That team is shit. Both lines are garbage. TCU isn’t a good team… I will say that was still a good win for Colorado though as I thought they had no chance.

    Then they beat a perennial shitty Nebraska team whom I’m certain had averaged 4 points a game for a decade.

    Good statement game by Oregon but Colorado is really bad.

    That being said this sets up a perfect upset against USC at home.

    Agree about CU. They’ve gotten progressively worse on offense with each game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,443
    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    Colorado does not have a “good offense”.

    That team is shit. Both lines are garbage. TCU isn’t a good team… I will say that was still a good win for Colorado though as I thought they had no chance.

    Then they beat a perennial shitty Nebraska team whom I’m certain had averaged 4 points a game for a decade.

    Good statement game by Oregon but Colorado is really bad.

    That being said this sets up a perfect upset against USC at home.

    Agree about CU. They’ve gotten progressively worse on offense with each game.
    teams have figured out you just bull rush Shedeur every down. dude doesn't get rid of the ball and his shitty RBs can't block.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter