Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pac-12 Power Rankings Week Four

2

Comments

  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,269
    Oregon has very similar overall metrics to Washington. How the Ducks go about it may be different but these two teams are fairly evenly matched. Going to be a hell of a game in 3 weeks.
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    Sources said:

    dtd said:

    Nix is not a clutch QB.

    Nix is skittish in the pocket and an unsure passer.

    Doog bullshit.

    Define clutch. He had game winning last minute drives against WSU, and UNC in the bowel game, last year. He played on 1 leg in the win against Utah when everyone, including myself, thought it was going to be a bloodbath. The UW and OS losses are all time nut kicks I will never forget, but Nix had 600 yards and 5 TDs in those 2.

    He's also constantly looking down field and going for big plays instead of running the ball. He's the opposite of skittish, he's in total command.

    Oh, and I spent $400 to drive up to Dallas to watch him lead a last minute drive to beat Oregon(nothing else matters).

    And yes, UW/UO is a name your score game for the Huskies this year, and I have come to peace with that. FYFMFE.
    I agree with most of this, but Nix is not a guy who looks downfield "constantly"

    Well, he might look downfield, but he is is quicker to pull the trigger on check downs and runs than Penix ... for a variety of reasons.
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    TheHB said:

    Sources said:

    dtd said:

    Nix is not a clutch QB.

    Nix is skittish in the pocket and an unsure passer.

    Doog bullshit.

    Define clutch. He had game winning last minute drives against WSU, and UNC in the bowel game, last year. He played on 1 leg in the win against Utah when everyone, including myself, thought it was going to be a bloodbath. The UW and OS losses are all time nut kicks I will never forget, but Nix had 600 yards and 5 TDs in those 2.

    He's also constantly looking down field and going for big plays instead of running the ball. He's the opposite of skittish, he's in total command.

    Oh, and I spent $400 to drive up to Dallas to watch him lead a last minute drive to beat Oregon(nothing else matters).

    And yes, UW/UO is a name your score game for the Huskies this year, and I have come to peace with that. FYFMFE.
    I agree with most of this, but Nix is not a guy who looks downfield "constantly"

    Well, he might look downfield, but he is is quicker to pull the trigger on check downs and runs than Penix ... for a variety of reasons.
    On many of those throws we have blockers downfield and the throw has to be behind the LOS. Those are an extension of the run game.

    It’s like many of you don’t watch Oregon.

  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member Posts: 14,087
    DucksFC said:

    I almost thought this was the Duck bored with all this dooging and quooking bullshit.

    UW/UO game will be a pick your score. Both teams offense with the best of them, and defense questionably. First team to not shit their pants and actually play pass defense wins.

    First team to 81 wins.
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    bisonduck said:

    TheHB said:

    Sources said:

    dtd said:

    Nix is not a clutch QB.

    Nix is skittish in the pocket and an unsure passer.

    Doog bullshit.

    Define clutch. He had game winning last minute drives against WSU, and UNC in the bowel game, last year. He played on 1 leg in the win against Utah when everyone, including myself, thought it was going to be a bloodbath. The UW and OS losses are all time nut kicks I will never forget, but Nix had 600 yards and 5 TDs in those 2.

    He's also constantly looking down field and going for big plays instead of running the ball. He's the opposite of skittish, he's in total command.

    Oh, and I spent $400 to drive up to Dallas to watch him lead a last minute drive to beat Oregon(nothing else matters).

    And yes, UW/UO is a name your score game for the Huskies this year, and I have come to peace with that. FYFMFE.
    I agree with most of this, but Nix is not a guy who looks downfield "constantly"

    Well, he might look downfield, but he is is quicker to pull the trigger on check downs and runs than Penix ... for a variety of reasons.
    On many of those throws we have blockers downfield and the throw has to be behind the LOS. Those are an extension of the run game.

    It’s like many of you don’t watch Oregon.

    I value my eyesight.
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    TheHB said:

    I like to call short passes an extension of the run game. I do that.

    Philosophically you can hate it. That said, it doesn’t mean Nix cannot process the play when it’s a designed throw behind the LOS.
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715

    Some of y'all are ridiculous. Don't really know where calling Nix not clutch comes from. He led a last second drive to beat Herbert and Oregon in his first ever season. His MO actually tends to be throwing bad picks early and cleaning it up. If Franklin doesn't step out of bounds he may have led a comeback against UW on TWO LEGS. He's a pain in the ass to defend and playing his fifth full year of college football so he's veteran savvy. I'd possibly trade some of Penix' passing ability for Nix' mobility.

    Washington's passing game is much scarier than Oregon's and receivers 1-3 are much better. Oregon's run game is much scarier and Irving is a nightmare to defend.

    Both defenses are major questions. Oregon blanking Colorado shows a lot more than UW's has, but they also got blown up by Texas Tech in a performance which is worse than any UW's has shown, so who knows.

    Hard game to call right now. I think Penix being able to audible much better and easier in Husky Stadium opposed to Autzen could make a big difference.

    All of this ^.

    Although I will quook and say the Ducks D turned a corner after the tech game. DBs aren’t panicking, linebackers are playing their assignments, and Evan Williams, who had a rough outing against Tech, knocked off first game rust in a new scheme, and is playing much, much better.

    I could say the same for UW too. The defense is better than last year.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Different people over the years have periodically posted conference power rankings each week. Figured it's time to do some now that conference play has started. I'll try to do them each week if I'm not too hungover or depressed.

    1. Washington - I'm dooging for now. Sure, they haven't beaten anyone, but neither has anyone else, and they've beaten three teams now that are just as good as any team almost anyone else in the conference has beaten like they were high school teams. Still don't trust the defense though and specifically the pass defense.

    2. Oregon - I think Colorado isn't very good. That doesn't mean beating them the way the Ducks did wasn't impressive. Nix/Irving/Franklin is up for best QB/RB/WR1 combos in college football and the offensive line looks better than I hoped it would after losing so much from 2022. The defense looked bad against Texas Tech and good against what seemed like a good Colorado offense going in. Which version they are probably dictates if they can win the conference or lose 2-3 games.

    3. Utah - I guess. They need Rising back. Even with him back what are they doing to do if they're defense can't hold teams to 20 points or less?

    4. USC - Absolutely do not trust this team. They've played maybe the easiest schedule in the nation thus far and looked vulnerable against a terrible ASU team. What's scary about this team outside of Caleb Williams?

    5. Washington State - I know Coug fans. I think they might have the two best wins thus far. I'll reason they got two overrated teams at home, but at the very worst, they look like a tough out for everyone in the conference and Cam Ward is looking really good.

    6. Oregon State - DJU is average at best and that's not good for them. Looks like losing their veteran DBs from last year is going to loom large. They're offensive line and run game is still good though and they probably would benefit from damn near running the option with DJU.

    7. UCLA - Don't really know what to make of this team. Their QB could be pretty good by the end of the year and their defense could be surprisingly one of the best in the conference. Feels like they're a 7-8-win team tops though.

    8. Colorado - I don't think they're very good and getting to even just a bowl game would be a big accomplishment. Their lines are terrible and they should get ran by any of the teams above them on this list.

    9. Arizona - Not a good sign they barely beat Stanford. Their offense isn't as good as I thought it would be and their defense better than I thought it would be. If the rapist gets a hot hand they could sneak up on some teams.

    10. Cal - Ugh. I don't know. Figured this was going to be a typical Wilcox team that has a good defense and is a tough out, but their offense is dogshit. Hoping Uw's offense is just that good.

    11. Arizona State - I thought they were dead until they showed fight against USC. They look terrible at QB though, which means they'll light it up in Husky Stadium. Dillingham adds name to long list of people who look great in Eugene and terrible everywhere else.

    12. Stanford - Thought they would easily be the worst after the Sacramento State. Looks like they could easily beat anyone below UCLA to me though.

    Mostly agree.

    Furd too high.
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    bisonduck said:

    TheHB said:

    I like to call short passes an extension of the run game. I do that.

    Philosophically you can hate it. That said, it doesn’t mean Nix cannot process the play when it’s a designed throw behind the LOS.
    Of course. And I think Nix is a good QB. I still think he is quicker to check down and/or run than Penix is. Regardless of the play call. That's all. Not really a knock, but I know you guys like to find slights even when they're not there. (Hi Dan Lanning!)
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    edited September 2023
    Also, is everyone here saying Polk is better than Troy Franklin? It seems to be the consensus.
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    TheHB said:

    bisonduck said:

    TheHB said:

    I like to call short passes an extension of the run game. I do that.

    Philosophically you can hate it. That said, it doesn’t mean Nix cannot process the play when it’s a designed throw behind the LOS.
    Of course. And I think Nix is a good QB. I still think he is quicker to check down and/or run than Penix is. Regardless of the play call. That's all. Not really a knock, but I know you guys like to find slights even when they're not there. (Hi Dan Lanning!)
    I think Bo might have scrambled 3x on a designed pass plays and each time it extended the drive. Also, it’s not a check down if play is required to be behind the LOS. I didn’t take it as a slight. I didn’t take it as a slight. It’s just wrong.

    There’s a lot of RPOs with throws that are required behind the LOS because of the blocking scheme.

    A check down by definition should be a throw behind the sticks when there are vertical routes beyond the sticks.

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    bisonduck said:

    TheHB said:

    Sources said:

    dtd said:

    Nix is not a clutch QB.

    Nix is skittish in the pocket and an unsure passer.

    Doog bullshit.

    Define clutch. He had game winning last minute drives against WSU, and UNC in the bowel game, last year. He played on 1 leg in the win against Utah when everyone, including myself, thought it was going to be a bloodbath. The UW and OS losses are all time nut kicks I will never forget, but Nix had 600 yards and 5 TDs in those 2.

    He's also constantly looking down field and going for big plays instead of running the ball. He's the opposite of skittish, he's in total command.

    Oh, and I spent $400 to drive up to Dallas to watch him lead a last minute drive to beat Oregon(nothing else matters).

    And yes, UW/UO is a name your score game for the Huskies this year, and I have come to peace with that. FYFMFE.
    I agree with most of this, but Nix is not a guy who looks downfield "constantly"

    Well, he might look downfield, but he is is quicker to pull the trigger on check downs and runs than Penix ... for a variety of reasons.
    On many of those throws we have blockers downfield and the throw has to be behind the LOS. Those are an extension of the run game.

    It’s like many of you don’t watch Oregon.

    It's because we do watch Oregon that the 80% completion percentage is meaningless.

    At least half his passes against CU were at or behind the LOS.

    Oregon's weapons on the outside are impressive and if no one can stop it then there's no reason to do anything different. But there's no point comparing Nix's numbers (or the pass protection numbers) to anyone else. Oregon's passing attack this year makes the Air Raid look vertical.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,436 Founders Club

    DucksFC said:

    I almost thought this was the Duck bored with all this dooging and quooking bullshit.

    UW/UO game will be a pick your score. Both teams offense with the best of them, and defense questionably. First team to not shit their pants and actually play pass defense wins.

    Oregon is getting boat raced at Huskieieiie Stadium

    Take all the screenshots you need
    Agree.

    #BringYourOwnPlunger


  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,086 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    bisonduck said:

    TheHB said:

    Sources said:

    dtd said:

    Nix is not a clutch QB.

    Nix is skittish in the pocket and an unsure passer.

    Doog bullshit.

    Define clutch. He had game winning last minute drives against WSU, and UNC in the bowel game, last year. He played on 1 leg in the win against Utah when everyone, including myself, thought it was going to be a bloodbath. The UW and OS losses are all time nut kicks I will never forget, but Nix had 600 yards and 5 TDs in those 2.

    He's also constantly looking down field and going for big plays instead of running the ball. He's the opposite of skittish, he's in total command.

    Oh, and I spent $400 to drive up to Dallas to watch him lead a last minute drive to beat Oregon(nothing else matters).

    And yes, UW/UO is a name your score game for the Huskies this year, and I have come to peace with that. FYFMFE.
    I agree with most of this, but Nix is not a guy who looks downfield "constantly"

    Well, he might look downfield, but he is is quicker to pull the trigger on check downs and runs than Penix ... for a variety of reasons.
    On many of those throws we have blockers downfield and the throw has to be behind the LOS. Those are an extension of the run game.

    It’s like many of you don’t watch Oregon.

    It's because we do watch Oregon that the 80% completion percentage is meaningless.

    At least half his passes against CU were at or behind the LOS.

    Oregon's weapons on the outside are impressive and if no one can stop it then there's no reason to do anything different. But there's no point comparing Nix's numbers (or the pass protection numbers) to anyone else. Oregon's passing attack this year makes the Air Raid look vertical.
    If you can throw a bunch of sideways passes and succeed, why not? Especially because it probably slows pass rush and spreads out defenses for run game success. Outside of Franklin, and Irving as a receiver somewhat, are their outside weapons really that impressive? After Franklin the receivers have looked pretty JAGy thus far and have maybe had 100 yards in their two games against P5 opponents, including Colorado's awful D.
    bisonduck said:

    Also, is everyone here saying Polk is better than Troy Franklin? It seems to be the consensus.

    Stats are comparable. I've been super impressed with Polk so far. Hard to say because you could say Franklin should get credit for doing it without Odunze and McMillan distracting coverage but you could also say Polk might be even more productive and impressive if he was a clear number one target.
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    edited September 2023
    Oregon’s other WRs are Tez Johnson, Gary Bryant Jr and Taeshon Holden. Tez is an absolute mismatch in the slot. Oregon doesn’t throw it 50x downfield so production is meaningless.

    They’re not as good as UWs trio but probably the best collection at Oregon that I can remember.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839

    dnc said:

    bisonduck said:

    TheHB said:

    Sources said:

    dtd said:

    Nix is not a clutch QB.

    Nix is skittish in the pocket and an unsure passer.

    Doog bullshit.

    Define clutch. He had game winning last minute drives against WSU, and UNC in the bowel game, last year. He played on 1 leg in the win against Utah when everyone, including myself, thought it was going to be a bloodbath. The UW and OS losses are all time nut kicks I will never forget, but Nix had 600 yards and 5 TDs in those 2.

    He's also constantly looking down field and going for big plays instead of running the ball. He's the opposite of skittish, he's in total command.

    Oh, and I spent $400 to drive up to Dallas to watch him lead a last minute drive to beat Oregon(nothing else matters).

    And yes, UW/UO is a name your score game for the Huskies this year, and I have come to peace with that. FYFMFE.
    I agree with most of this, but Nix is not a guy who looks downfield "constantly"

    Well, he might look downfield, but he is is quicker to pull the trigger on check downs and runs than Penix ... for a variety of reasons.
    On many of those throws we have blockers downfield and the throw has to be behind the LOS. Those are an extension of the run game.

    It’s like many of you don’t watch Oregon.

    It's because we do watch Oregon that the 80% completion percentage is meaningless.

    At least half his passes against CU were at or behind the LOS.

    Oregon's weapons on the outside are impressive and if no one can stop it then there's no reason to do anything different. But there's no point comparing Nix's numbers (or the pass protection numbers) to anyone else. Oregon's passing attack this year makes the Air Raid look vertical.
    If you can throw a bunch of sideways passes and succeed, why not? Especially because it probably slows pass rush and spreads out defenses for run game success. Outside of Franklin, and Irving as a receiver somewhat, are their outside weapons really that impressive? After Franklin the receivers have looked pretty JAGy thus far and have maybe had 100 yards in their two games against P5 opponents, including Colorado's awful D.
    bisonduck said:

    Also, is everyone here saying Polk is better than Troy Franklin? It seems to be the consensus.

    Stats are comparable. I've been super impressed with Polk so far. Hard to say because you could say Franklin should get credit for doing it without Odunze and McMillan distracting coverage but you could also say Polk might be even more productive and impressive if he was a clear number one target.
    I wouldn't trade weapons with them by any means but they have been really good at making people miss and turning those screens into very positive yards. They seem to block pretty well on the outside too.
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    From what I’ve seen, Polk has elite hands. Troy Franklin has an elite release off the line. The dude is constantly wide open.

    Tez Johnson will be the quickest on the field.

    This should be an absolute battle royale.
  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,065
    edited September 2023
    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, but they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    DucksFC said:

    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, while Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).

    Game will be decided by QB play. Let’s see who shits the bed first.
    If Rome/McMillan/Polk are healthy not sure there is a defense in this country can stop them
  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,065
    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, while Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).

    Game will be decided by QB play. Let’s see who shits the bed first.
    If Rome/McMillan/Polk are healthy not sure there is a defense in this country can stop them
    agreed. If our DBs can actually handle them I'll probably go full Quook because that would be one hell of an accomplishment.

    the QB duel will be legendary.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    DucksFC said:

    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, while Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).

    Game will be decided by QB play. Let’s see who shits the bed first.
    If Rome/McMillan/Polk are healthy not sure there is a defense in this country can stop them
    agreed. If our DBs can actually handle them I'll probably go full Quook because that would be one hell of an accomplishment.

    the QB duel will be legendary.
    If your DB room can handle them… then that is best DB room in the country…no question. Cal game could have been far worse if McMillan was healthy
  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,065
    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, while Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).

    Game will be decided by QB play. Let’s see who shits the bed first.
    If Rome/McMillan/Polk are healthy not sure there is a defense in this country can stop them
    agreed. If our DBs can actually handle them I'll probably go full Quook because that would be one hell of an accomplishment.

    the QB duel will be legendary.
    If your DB room can handle them… then that is best DB room in the country…no question. Cal game could have been far worse if McMillan was healthy
    Jackson/Florence are very good. They completely shut down Shedeur and Colorado's receivers. But UW is a far bigger task. Also they need to stay healthy because Bridges is mid, Manning is trash and the freshmen are too young.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    DucksFC said:

    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    FireCohen said:

    DucksFC said:

    Might Quook here a bit, but IMO Troy and Rome are on the same tier. Both elite top 5 level receivers in the country. After that, while Tez/Holden/Bryant are far better than any further options we've had for years, they're a step below McMillan/Polk. I do love Tez, perfect slot guy.

    For us? I think the guy who makes or breaks the offense for the game is Bucky. I know this bored likes him too. He's my favorite Duck RB since LMJ, fucking beast. If UW stops him we? probably lose.

    Defensively, I don't know. We? looked fantastic against a GOOD Colorado team, but sucked ass against Texas Tech. Though part of the issue with TTU was that we? haven't defended a running QB since football started for us (1994).

    Game will be decided by QB play. Let’s see who shits the bed first.
    If Rome/McMillan/Polk are healthy not sure there is a defense in this country can stop them
    agreed. If our DBs can actually handle them I'll probably go full Quook because that would be one hell of an accomplishment.

    the QB duel will be legendary.
    If your DB room can handle them… then that is best DB room in the country…no question. Cal game could have been far worse if McMillan was healthy
    Jackson/Florence are very good. They completely shut down Shedeur and Colorado's receivers. But UW is a far bigger task. Also they need to stay healthy because Bridges is mid, Manning is trash and the freshmen are too young.
    Not sure you can even compare WR rooms, caz hunter was out. But OL at Colorado is not great, not saying UW is amazing but significantly better. Hopefully both teams win and we have 2 weeks to talk shit
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Colorado does not have a “good offense”.

    That team is shit. Both lines are garbage. TCU isn’t a good team… I will say that was still a good win for Colorado though as I thought they had no chance.

    Then they beat a perennial shitty Nebraska team whom I’m certain had averaged 4 points a game for a decade.

    Good statement game by Oregon but Colorado is really bad.

    That being said this sets up a perfect upset against USC at home.
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,190 Standard Supporter

    Colorado does not have a “good offense”.

    That team is shit. Both lines are garbage. TCU isn’t a good team… I will say that was still a good win for Colorado though as I thought they had no chance.

    Then they beat a perennial shitty Nebraska team whom I’m certain had averaged 4 points a game for a decade.

    Good statement game by Oregon but Colorado is really bad.

    That being said this sets up a perfect upset against USC at home.

    Agree about CU. They’ve gotten progressively worse on offense with each game.
  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,065

    Colorado does not have a “good offense”.

    That team is shit. Both lines are garbage. TCU isn’t a good team… I will say that was still a good win for Colorado though as I thought they had no chance.

    Then they beat a perennial shitty Nebraska team whom I’m certain had averaged 4 points a game for a decade.

    Good statement game by Oregon but Colorado is really bad.

    That being said this sets up a perfect upset against USC at home.

    Agree about CU. They’ve gotten progressively worse on offense with each game.
    teams have figured out you just bull rush Shedeur every down. dude doesn't get rid of the ball and his shitty RBs can't block.