I’m just pissed
Comments
-
@creepycougPurpleBaze said:
kramerthatstrue.gifCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
We really pics of both to truly judge.PurpleBaze said:
Pics of wife's ass when she was in her 20's?!creepycoug said:It's done. I'm not here for reviewing the 'why'. Of course I'll miss the P12. But I also miss my wife's ass as it existed when she was in her 20s. C'est la vie. Or whatever.
-
Different sites create these rankings for different purposes. Some try to look at the best value (cost going in versus salary coming out) whereas others give different weights to different metrics.StLouisDawg said:
US News is about as good a ranking as Buzzfeed. If you look at scholarship and world changing research, Miami is a pale imitation of the true centers of civilization.YellowSnow said:
We always tie Miami. UW and Miami are tied at #55FireCohen said:
Miami is an academics school?YellowSnow said:I just think all of the Pac 12 academis smack talk over the years is pointless. It just doesn't matter in big time college football.
I think there's been a total of like 6 natties in the past 25 years by schools's with respectable academis. USC (2); Texas (1); Ohio State (2) and Miamuh (1). I really hate having to include Miamuh here, but @creepycoug told me I have to.
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-miami-1536
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-washington-3798
And I get your point that academis prowess is not generally appreciated in Football. And with NIL and the portal it will only get worse.
But I can still grieve while at the same time be relieved we are in the BIG 10. I guess this is my Kennedy getting shot moment. The world will never be quite the same.
To me, research dollars are the most important since there's a limited supply of dollars available and every university is competing to get what they can. The better universities are the ones awarded those grants and contracts. -
Tax program? Don’t you mean money laundering and tax evasion program?creepycoug said:
Miami has historically been a bit harder to get into, so the avg. undergrad there was a bit smarter than the average UW undergrad. Numbers don't lie. I don't know that that's the case anymore, but historically it was. Of course, while Miami has a teaching hospital, law school (with a great tax program) and business school, UW has historically ranked higher in many/most departments. It's not a research behemoth by any stretch, but yes, it's a school full of kids who were very solid students in high school. That, to me anyway, is the most relevant measure.YellowSnow said:
We always tie Miami. UW and Miami are tied at #55FireCohen said:
Miami is an academics school?YellowSnow said:I just think all of the Pac 12 academis smack talk over the years is pointless. It just doesn't matter in big time college football.
I think there's been a total of like 6 natties in the past 25 years by schools's with respectable academis. USC (2); Texas (1); Ohio State (2) and Miamuh (1). I really hate having to include Miamuh here, but @creepycoug told me I have to.
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-miami-1536
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-washington-3798 -
So, the University of Kentucky and Cal Tech are about on par with one another. Colorado State and Univ. of South Florida are better universities than Princeton. The University of Utah is better than the University of Chicago.whatshouldicareabout said:
Different sites create these rankings for different purposes. Some try to look at the best value (cost going in versus salary coming out) whereas others give different weights to different metrics.StLouisDawg said:
US News is about as good a ranking as Buzzfeed. If you look at scholarship and world changing research, Miami is a pale imitation of the true centers of civilization.YellowSnow said:
We always tie Miami. UW and Miami are tied at #55FireCohen said:
Miami is an academics school?YellowSnow said:I just think all of the Pac 12 academis smack talk over the years is pointless. It just doesn't matter in big time college football.
I think there's been a total of like 6 natties in the past 25 years by schools's with respectable academis. USC (2); Texas (1); Ohio State (2) and Miamuh (1). I really hate having to include Miamuh here, but @creepycoug told me I have to.
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-miami-1536
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-washington-3798
And I get your point that academis prowess is not generally appreciated in Football. And with NIL and the portal it will only get worse.
But I can still grieve while at the same time be relieved we are in the BIG 10. I guess this is my Kennedy getting shot moment. The world will never be quite the same.
To me, research dollars are the most important since there's a limited supply of dollars available and every university is competing to get what they can. The better universities are the ones awarded those grants and contracts.
I see.
I don't. -
Hold your horses, UW is a degree mill run by the Gates Foundation and IHME.
-
Whothefuckareyou.gifJetFuelSteelBeams said:Hold your horses, UW is a degree mill run by the Gates Foundation and IHME.
And TITTT -
-
Certainly US Views and World distort has some merit. It measures cultural relevance as much as quality. The international ones that rank UW highly are the ones based on how often an institutions scholarly work is used or incorporated into other scholarly work, as well as other objective measures. And large research universities do have an inherent advantage for that. But not always.creepycoug said:
So, the University of Kentucky and Cal Tech are about on par with one another. Colorado State and Univ. of South Florida are better universities than Princeton. The University of Utah is better than the University of Chicago.whatshouldicareabout said:
Different sites create these rankings for different purposes. Some try to look at the best value (cost going in versus salary coming out) whereas others give different weights to different metrics.StLouisDawg said:
US News is about as good a ranking as Buzzfeed. If you look at scholarship and world changing research, Miami is a pale imitation of the true centers of civilization.YellowSnow said:
We always tie Miami. UW and Miami are tied at #55FireCohen said:
Miami is an academics school?YellowSnow said:I just think all of the Pac 12 academis smack talk over the years is pointless. It just doesn't matter in big time college football.
I think there's been a total of like 6 natties in the past 25 years by schools's with respectable academis. USC (2); Texas (1); Ohio State (2) and Miamuh (1). I really hate having to include Miamuh here, but @creepycoug told me I have to.
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-miami-1536
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-washington-3798
And I get your point that academis prowess is not generally appreciated in Football. And with NIL and the portal it will only get worse.
But I can still grieve while at the same time be relieved we are in the BIG 10. I guess this is my Kennedy getting shot moment. The world will never be quite the same.
To me, research dollars are the most important since there's a limited supply of dollars available and every university is competing to get what they can. The better universities are the ones awarded those grants and contracts.
I see.
I don't.
Chicago is a great example. Its scholarly output is above UW despite being much smaller. And also on point, they gave up football in the 1920’s because it didn’t fit into their view of what higher education was about.
But to be clear, my only point in all this is the PAC was special both in academics and in athletics. I think the lesson is they (we) are sometimes too fucking smart to figure out we are pushing on a pull door. Mesmerized by the smell of our own farts, as the Mormons have been known to say. -
Agree with that.StLouisDawg said:
Certainly US Views and World distort has some merit. It measures cultural relevance as much as quality. The international ones that rank UW highly are the ones based on how often an institutions scholarly work is used or incorporated into other scholarly work, as well as other objective measures. And large research universities do have an inherent advantage for that. But not always.creepycoug said:
So, the University of Kentucky and Cal Tech are about on par with one another. Colorado State and Univ. of South Florida are better universities than Princeton. The University of Utah is better than the University of Chicago.whatshouldicareabout said:
Different sites create these rankings for different purposes. Some try to look at the best value (cost going in versus salary coming out) whereas others give different weights to different metrics.StLouisDawg said:
US News is about as good a ranking as Buzzfeed. If you look at scholarship and world changing research, Miami is a pale imitation of the true centers of civilization.YellowSnow said:
We always tie Miami. UW and Miami are tied at #55FireCohen said:
Miami is an academics school?YellowSnow said:I just think all of the Pac 12 academis smack talk over the years is pointless. It just doesn't matter in big time college football.
I think there's been a total of like 6 natties in the past 25 years by schools's with respectable academis. USC (2); Texas (1); Ohio State (2) and Miamuh (1). I really hate having to include Miamuh here, but @creepycoug told me I have to.
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-miami-1536
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-washington-3798
And I get your point that academis prowess is not generally appreciated in Football. And with NIL and the portal it will only get worse.
But I can still grieve while at the same time be relieved we are in the BIG 10. I guess this is my Kennedy getting shot moment. The world will never be quite the same.
To me, research dollars are the most important since there's a limited supply of dollars available and every university is competing to get what they can. The better universities are the ones awarded those grants and contracts.
I see.
I don't.
Chicago is a great example. Its scholarly output is above UW despite being much smaller. And also on point, they gave up football in the 1920’s because it didn’t fit into their view of what higher education was about.
But to be clear, my only point in all this is the PAC was special both in academics and in athletics. I think the lesson is they (we) are sometimes too fucking smart to figure out we are pushing on a pull door. Mesmerized by the smell of our own farts, as the Mormons have been known to say. -
Aren't those the best kind?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Tax program? Don’t you mean money laundering and tax evasion program?creepycoug said:
Miami has historically been a bit harder to get into, so the avg. undergrad there was a bit smarter than the average UW undergrad. Numbers don't lie. I don't know that that's the case anymore, but historically it was. Of course, while Miami has a teaching hospital, law school (with a great tax program) and business school, UW has historically ranked higher in many/most departments. It's not a research behemoth by any stretch, but yes, it's a school full of kids who were very solid students in high school. That, to me anyway, is the most relevant measure.YellowSnow said:
We always tie Miami. UW and Miami are tied at #55FireCohen said:
Miami is an academics school?YellowSnow said:I just think all of the Pac 12 academis smack talk over the years is pointless. It just doesn't matter in big time college football.
I think there's been a total of like 6 natties in the past 25 years by schools's with respectable academis. USC (2); Texas (1); Ohio State (2) and Miamuh (1). I really hate having to include Miamuh here, but @creepycoug told me I have to.
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-miami-1536
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/university-of-washington-3798
