Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Question of the day

13»

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,595 Standard Supporter
    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Let's look at the OOC schedules of teams that played the SEC in the title game. Shall we?

    2013 FSU: @Pitt, Nevada, Bethune-Cookman, Florida (SEC teams don't play anyone, though)
    2012 Notre Dame: Independent school. Argument isn't valid here. Definitely earned their spot, but got raped by Bama.
    2011: The infamous all-SEC title game... Bama played at Penn St. and LSU beat Oregon OOC
    2010 Oregon: New Mexico, @Tennessee (SEC teams don't play anyone, though), Portland St.
    2009 Texas: Louisiana-Monroe, @Wyoming, UTEP, Central Florida
    2008: Chattanooga, Cincinnati, UW (0-12 baby!!!), TCU
    2007 Ohio St: Youngstown St. Akron, @Washington , Kent St.
    2006 Ohio St: Northern Illinois, @Texas, Cincinnati, Bowling Green
    2003 Oklahoma: North Texas, @Alabama (SEC teams don't play anyone, though), UCLA
    1998 FSU: Texas A/M, USC, @Miami, Florida (one loss team, but also played the toughest schedule on this list)

    As you can see, most of the teams that "earned" their trip to the title game versus SEC opponents played cupcake schedules OOC, save for 1998 FSU, 2003 Oklahoma, and Notre Dame in 2012.


    You're wasting your time with PLSS and Bill. I laid out last years OOC schedules and showed that the SEC played as tough or tougher of a schedule as anyone. They'll just ignore facts.

    PLSS I understand. I don't know why Bill is such a retard about it though.
    That's one fucking year. You're completely missing the long term trend. This didn't start in 2012. Do I need to dredge out the OOC schedules from 2006, 2007, 2008 etc.? Like Puppy said, if every conference was treated equally every year, I wouldn't be bitching about it. That hasn't been the case though.
    Hey dumbfuck... Are you gonna give the ACC shit? Oh wait, they aren't winning championships. So you can't really be jealous of them like the SEC.

    sports.yahoo.com/news/power-conference-schools-schedule-more-173800620--ncaaf.html

    All of the conferences have been doing it for a while, save for the Pac. We came on late.

    I also find it interesting how the SEC played more power conference OOC opponents than the Big 12, Big 10 and Pac 12 over the period between 2007-2012.

    FCS opponents
    ACC: 13 in 2012, 13 in 2011, 13 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 14 in 2008 and 7 in 2007, for a total of 74.
    SEC: 15 in 2012, 12 in 2011, 11 in 2010, 11 in 2009, 9 in 2008 and 9 in 2007, for a total of 67.
    Big Ten: 8 in 2012, 10 in 2011, 10 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 9 in 2008 and 8 in 2007, for a total of 54.
    Big 12: 9 in 2012, 6 in 2011, 8 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 10 in 2008 and 8 in 2007, for a total of 50.
    Big East: 9 in 2012, 8 in 2011, 8 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 7 in 2008 and 7 in 2007, for a total of 48.
    Pac-12: 9 in 2012, 8 in 2011, 7 in 2010, 4 in 2009, 2 in 2008 and 2 in 2007, for a total of 32.
    National totals: 63 in 2012, 57 in 2011, 57 in 2010, 56 in 2009, 51 in 2008 and 41 in 2007.

    Big Six nonconference opponents
    ACC: 23 in 2012, 20 in 2011, 19 in 2010, 20 in 2009, 23 in 2008 and 22 in 2007, for a total of 127.
    Big East: 16 in 2012, 16 in 2011, 15 in 2010, 16 in 2009, 16 in 2008 and 15 in 2007, for a total of 94.
    SEC: 14 in 2012, 12 in 2011, 16 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 15 in 2008 and 14 in 2007, for a total of 85.
    Big Ten: 15 in 2012, 14 in 2011, 12 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 13 in 2008 and 13 in 2007, for a total of 81.
    Pac-12: 11 in 2012, 16 in 2011, 14 in 2010, 15 in 2009, 14 in 2008 and 11 in 2007, for a total of 81.
    Big 12: 9 in 2012, 9 in 2011, 12 in 2010, 11 in 2009, 15 in 2008 and 11 in 2007, for a total of 67.
    National totals: 88 in 2012, 87 in 2011, 88 in 2010, 90 in 2009, 96 in 2008 and 86 in 2007.


    Yeah, they don't play anyone.
    LOL, you're ignoring the fact they have more teams and play more out of conference games. Try again.
    You could make the same argument for the amount of FCS games they play. More OOC games means they play less FCS teams per school.
    They're still playing a lot per school. 1.07 per school in 2012. DNC said that... I think...
    Just kneel down and kiss the rings bitch. You can't argue with their record in big games.


    I'll make sure to bump this thread after the SEC tears it up again this year. Roll Tide!!!!
    like they did last year Poindexter?

    bump whatever thread you want, and keep pressing & trying to fit in
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,242 Founders Club
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Let's look at the OOC schedules of teams that played the SEC in the title game. Shall we?

    2013 FSU: @Pitt, Nevada, Bethune-Cookman, Florida (SEC teams don't play anyone, though)
    2012 Notre Dame: Independent school. Argument isn't valid here. Definitely earned their spot, but got raped by Bama.
    2011: The infamous all-SEC title game... Bama played at Penn St. and LSU beat Oregon OOC
    2010 Oregon: New Mexico, @Tennessee (SEC teams don't play anyone, though), Portland St.
    2009 Texas: Louisiana-Monroe, @Wyoming, UTEP, Central Florida
    2008: Chattanooga, Cincinnati, UW (0-12 baby!!!), TCU
    2007 Ohio St: Youngstown St. Akron, @Washington , Kent St.
    2006 Ohio St: Northern Illinois, @Texas, Cincinnati, Bowling Green
    2003 Oklahoma: North Texas, @Alabama (SEC teams don't play anyone, though), UCLA
    1998 FSU: Texas A/M, USC, @Miami, Florida (one loss team, but also played the toughest schedule on this list)

    As you can see, most of the teams that "earned" their trip to the title game versus SEC opponents played cupcake schedules OOC, save for 1998 FSU, 2003 Oklahoma, and Notre Dame in 2012.


    You're wasting your time with PLSS and Bill. I laid out last years OOC schedules and showed that the SEC played as tough or tougher of a schedule as anyone. They'll just ignore facts.

    PLSS I understand. I don't know why Bill is such a retard about it though.
    That's one fucking year. You're completely missing the long term trend. This didn't start in 2012. Do I need to dredge out the OOC schedules from 2006, 2007, 2008 etc.? Like Puppy said, if every conference was treated equally every year, I wouldn't be bitching about it. That hasn't been the case though.
    Hey dumbfuck... Are you gonna give the ACC shit? Oh wait, they aren't winning championships. So you can't really be jealous of them like the SEC.

    sports.yahoo.com/news/power-conference-schools-schedule-more-173800620--ncaaf.html

    All of the conferences have been doing it for a while, save for the Pac. We came on late.

    I also find it interesting how the SEC played more power conference OOC opponents than the Big 12, Big 10 and Pac 12 over the period between 2007-2012.

    FCS opponents
    ACC: 13 in 2012, 13 in 2011, 13 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 14 in 2008 and 7 in 2007, for a total of 74.
    SEC: 15 in 2012, 12 in 2011, 11 in 2010, 11 in 2009, 9 in 2008 and 9 in 2007, for a total of 67.
    Big Ten: 8 in 2012, 10 in 2011, 10 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 9 in 2008 and 8 in 2007, for a total of 54.
    Big 12: 9 in 2012, 6 in 2011, 8 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 10 in 2008 and 8 in 2007, for a total of 50.
    Big East: 9 in 2012, 8 in 2011, 8 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 7 in 2008 and 7 in 2007, for a total of 48.
    Pac-12: 9 in 2012, 8 in 2011, 7 in 2010, 4 in 2009, 2 in 2008 and 2 in 2007, for a total of 32.
    National totals: 63 in 2012, 57 in 2011, 57 in 2010, 56 in 2009, 51 in 2008 and 41 in 2007.

    Big Six nonconference opponents
    ACC: 23 in 2012, 20 in 2011, 19 in 2010, 20 in 2009, 23 in 2008 and 22 in 2007, for a total of 127.
    Big East: 16 in 2012, 16 in 2011, 15 in 2010, 16 in 2009, 16 in 2008 and 15 in 2007, for a total of 94.
    SEC: 14 in 2012, 12 in 2011, 16 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 15 in 2008 and 14 in 2007, for a total of 85.
    Big Ten: 15 in 2012, 14 in 2011, 12 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 13 in 2008 and 13 in 2007, for a total of 81.
    Pac-12: 11 in 2012, 16 in 2011, 14 in 2010, 15 in 2009, 14 in 2008 and 11 in 2007, for a total of 81.
    Big 12: 9 in 2012, 9 in 2011, 12 in 2010, 11 in 2009, 15 in 2008 and 11 in 2007, for a total of 67.
    National totals: 88 in 2012, 87 in 2011, 88 in 2010, 90 in 2009, 96 in 2008 and 86 in 2007.


    Yeah, they don't play anyone.
    LOL, you're ignoring the fact they have more teams and play more out of conference games. Try again.
    You could make the same argument for the amount of FCS games they play. More OOC games means they play less FCS teams per school.
    They're still playing a lot per school. 1.07 per school in 2012. DNC said that... I think...
    Just kneel down and kiss the rings bitch. You can't argue with their record in big games.


    I'll make sure to bump this thread after the SEC tears it up again this year. Roll Tide!!!!
    What J? When the SEC tears it up against themselves? Then play themselves in the title game? Remember mighty Bama lost to Utah and Oklahoma in these "big games" you speak of. Oh, and a chronic .500 team in A&M at home.
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Let's look at the OOC schedules of teams that played the SEC in the title game. Shall we?

    2013 FSU: @Pitt, Nevada, Bethune-Cookman, Florida (SEC teams don't play anyone, though)
    2012 Notre Dame: Independent school. Argument isn't valid here. Definitely earned their spot, but got raped by Bama.
    2011: The infamous all-SEC title game... Bama played at Penn St. and LSU beat Oregon OOC
    2010 Oregon: New Mexico, @Tennessee (SEC teams don't play anyone, though), Portland St.
    2009 Texas: Louisiana-Monroe, @Wyoming, UTEP, Central Florida
    2008: Chattanooga, Cincinnati, UW (0-12 baby!!!), TCU
    2007 Ohio St: Youngstown St. Akron, @Washington , Kent St.
    2006 Ohio St: Northern Illinois, @Texas, Cincinnati, Bowling Green
    2003 Oklahoma: North Texas, @Alabama (SEC teams don't play anyone, though), UCLA
    1998 FSU: Texas A/M, USC, @Miami, Florida (one loss team, but also played the toughest schedule on this list)

    As you can see, most of the teams that "earned" their trip to the title game versus SEC opponents played cupcake schedules OOC, save for 1998 FSU, 2003 Oklahoma, and Notre Dame in 2012.


    You're wasting your time with PLSS and Bill. I laid out last years OOC schedules and showed that the SEC played as tough or tougher of a schedule as anyone. They'll just ignore facts.

    PLSS I understand. I don't know why Bill is such a retard about it though.
    That's one fucking year. You're completely missing the long term trend. This didn't start in 2012. Do I need to dredge out the OOC schedules from 2006, 2007, 2008 etc.? Like Puppy said, if every conference was treated equally every year, I wouldn't be bitching about it. That hasn't been the case though.
    Hey dumbfuck... Are you gonna give the ACC shit? Oh wait, they aren't winning championships. So you can't really be jealous of them like the SEC.

    sports.yahoo.com/news/power-conference-schools-schedule-more-173800620--ncaaf.html

    All of the conferences have been doing it for a while, save for the Pac. We came on late.

    I also find it interesting how the SEC played more power conference OOC opponents than the Big 12, Big 10 and Pac 12 over the period between 2007-2012.

    FCS opponents
    ACC: 13 in 2012, 13 in 2011, 13 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 14 in 2008 and 7 in 2007, for a total of 74.
    SEC: 15 in 2012, 12 in 2011, 11 in 2010, 11 in 2009, 9 in 2008 and 9 in 2007, for a total of 67.
    Big Ten: 8 in 2012, 10 in 2011, 10 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 9 in 2008 and 8 in 2007, for a total of 54.
    Big 12: 9 in 2012, 6 in 2011, 8 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 10 in 2008 and 8 in 2007, for a total of 50.
    Big East: 9 in 2012, 8 in 2011, 8 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 7 in 2008 and 7 in 2007, for a total of 48.
    Pac-12: 9 in 2012, 8 in 2011, 7 in 2010, 4 in 2009, 2 in 2008 and 2 in 2007, for a total of 32.
    National totals: 63 in 2012, 57 in 2011, 57 in 2010, 56 in 2009, 51 in 2008 and 41 in 2007.

    Big Six nonconference opponents
    ACC: 23 in 2012, 20 in 2011, 19 in 2010, 20 in 2009, 23 in 2008 and 22 in 2007, for a total of 127.
    Big East: 16 in 2012, 16 in 2011, 15 in 2010, 16 in 2009, 16 in 2008 and 15 in 2007, for a total of 94.
    SEC: 14 in 2012, 12 in 2011, 16 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 15 in 2008 and 14 in 2007, for a total of 85.
    Big Ten: 15 in 2012, 14 in 2011, 12 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 13 in 2008 and 13 in 2007, for a total of 81.
    Pac-12: 11 in 2012, 16 in 2011, 14 in 2010, 15 in 2009, 14 in 2008 and 11 in 2007, for a total of 81.
    Big 12: 9 in 2012, 9 in 2011, 12 in 2010, 11 in 2009, 15 in 2008 and 11 in 2007, for a total of 67.
    National totals: 88 in 2012, 87 in 2011, 88 in 2010, 90 in 2009, 96 in 2008 and 86 in 2007.


    Yeah, they don't play anyone.
    LOL, you're ignoring the fact they have more teams and play more out of conference games. Try again.
    You could make the same argument for the amount of FCS games they play. More OOC games means they play less FCS teams per school.
    They're still playing a lot per school. 1.07 per school in 2012. DNC said that... I think...
    Just kneel down and kiss the rings bitch. You can't argue with their record in big games.


    I'll make sure to bump this thread after the SEC tears it up again this year. Roll Tide!!!!
    like they did last year Poindexter?

    bump whatever thread you want, and keep pressing & trying to fit in
    Doog.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Lsu 43 doogs 3

    That game was great...made a couple hundred in Vegas on it. Spread was something like 20...a gimme.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    PurpleJ said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Fuck your tide, they have 12 returning starters, a 6-5 statue in Cocker who hasn't tickled a centers balls and everyone (ESPN, the owner of the college football ripoff) is projecting them #1. Don't let Georgia, SC or Auburn get in the way.

    Nobody is getting out of the pac12 alive (Unless your Oregon with a Nike schedule). Someone will get out of the SEC undefeated because it's only 6-deep. Then a second SEC team will get in over a 1 - loss pac12 team because of the ESPN lobby. Just watch. Again, fuck your tide!

    My Crimson Tide have 3 of the last 5 national championships. Doog.
    How can you not win 3 titles when you play 2 difficult games a year and a free pass to every title game? Then play one team, in your own conference, who you already beat comfortably during the regular season? Then play a ND team that squeaked by Pitt in 3 overtimes another year? Those national titles were flukes and given to Saban on a silver platter
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy fuckall
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,595 Standard Supporter
    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Let's look at the OOC schedules of teams that played the SEC in the title game. Shall we?

    2013 FSU: @Pitt, Nevada, Bethune-Cookman, Florida (SEC teams don't play anyone, though)
    2012 Notre Dame: Independent school. Argument isn't valid here. Definitely earned their spot, but got raped by Bama.
    2011: The infamous all-SEC title game... Bama played at Penn St. and LSU beat Oregon OOC
    2010 Oregon: New Mexico, @Tennessee (SEC teams don't play anyone, though), Portland St.
    2009 Texas: Louisiana-Monroe, @Wyoming, UTEP, Central Florida
    2008: Chattanooga, Cincinnati, UW (0-12 baby!!!), TCU
    2007 Ohio St: Youngstown St. Akron, @Washington , Kent St.
    2006 Ohio St: Northern Illinois, @Texas, Cincinnati, Bowling Green
    2003 Oklahoma: North Texas, @Alabama (SEC teams don't play anyone, though), UCLA
    1998 FSU: Texas A/M, USC, @Miami, Florida (one loss team, but also played the toughest schedule on this list)

    As you can see, most of the teams that "earned" their trip to the title game versus SEC opponents played cupcake schedules OOC, save for 1998 FSU, 2003 Oklahoma, and Notre Dame in 2012.


    You're wasting your time with PLSS and Bill. I laid out last years OOC schedules and showed that the SEC played as tough or tougher of a schedule as anyone. They'll just ignore facts.

    PLSS I understand. I don't know why Bill is such a retard about it though.
    That's one fucking year. You're completely missing the long term trend. This didn't start in 2012. Do I need to dredge out the OOC schedules from 2006, 2007, 2008 etc.? Like Puppy said, if every conference was treated equally every year, I wouldn't be bitching about it. That hasn't been the case though.
    Hey dumbfuck... Are you gonna give the ACC shit? Oh wait, they aren't winning championships. So you can't really be jealous of them like the SEC.

    sports.yahoo.com/news/power-conference-schools-schedule-more-173800620--ncaaf.html

    All of the conferences have been doing it for a while, save for the Pac. We came on late.

    I also find it interesting how the SEC played more power conference OOC opponents than the Big 12, Big 10 and Pac 12 over the period between 2007-2012.

    FCS opponents
    ACC: 13 in 2012, 13 in 2011, 13 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 14 in 2008 and 7 in 2007, for a total of 74.
    SEC: 15 in 2012, 12 in 2011, 11 in 2010, 11 in 2009, 9 in 2008 and 9 in 2007, for a total of 67.
    Big Ten: 8 in 2012, 10 in 2011, 10 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 9 in 2008 and 8 in 2007, for a total of 54.
    Big 12: 9 in 2012, 6 in 2011, 8 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 10 in 2008 and 8 in 2007, for a total of 50.
    Big East: 9 in 2012, 8 in 2011, 8 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 7 in 2008 and 7 in 2007, for a total of 48.
    Pac-12: 9 in 2012, 8 in 2011, 7 in 2010, 4 in 2009, 2 in 2008 and 2 in 2007, for a total of 32.
    National totals: 63 in 2012, 57 in 2011, 57 in 2010, 56 in 2009, 51 in 2008 and 41 in 2007.

    Big Six nonconference opponents
    ACC: 23 in 2012, 20 in 2011, 19 in 2010, 20 in 2009, 23 in 2008 and 22 in 2007, for a total of 127.
    Big East: 16 in 2012, 16 in 2011, 15 in 2010, 16 in 2009, 16 in 2008 and 15 in 2007, for a total of 94.
    SEC: 14 in 2012, 12 in 2011, 16 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 15 in 2008 and 14 in 2007, for a total of 85.
    Big Ten: 15 in 2012, 14 in 2011, 12 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 13 in 2008 and 13 in 2007, for a total of 81.
    Pac-12: 11 in 2012, 16 in 2011, 14 in 2010, 15 in 2009, 14 in 2008 and 11 in 2007, for a total of 81.
    Big 12: 9 in 2012, 9 in 2011, 12 in 2010, 11 in 2009, 15 in 2008 and 11 in 2007, for a total of 67.
    National totals: 88 in 2012, 87 in 2011, 88 in 2010, 90 in 2009, 96 in 2008 and 86 in 2007.


    Yeah, they don't play anyone.
    LOL, you're ignoring the fact they have more teams and play more out of conference games. Try again.
    You could make the same argument for the amount of FCS games they play. More OOC games means they play less FCS teams per school.
    They're still playing a lot per school. 1.07 per school in 2012. DNC said that... I think...
    Just kneel down and kiss the rings bitch. You can't argue with their record in big games.


    I'll make sure to bump this thread after the SEC tears it up again this year. Roll Tide!!!!
    like they did last year Poindexter?

    bump whatever thread you want, and keep pressing & trying to fit in
    Doog.


    Yawn
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,595 Standard Supporter
    http://m.youtube.com/?dc=organic&source=mog#/watch?v=8-677I64vRM
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    7 in a row!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,163
    The SEC is slightly better than the Pac 12 most years, say 5.81% better? They've had a good run of success, but look for that to end shortly, and for Big 12, Pac 12, and Big 10 teams to start winning titles again.


    About fucking time. Southerners are annoying 81.5% of the time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    MikeDamone said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Not arguing about the SEC, but Missouri got to the SEC title game because they didn't play Alabama, LSU, or Auburn in the regular season. They also play in the SEC East which was shit last year. Florida and Georgia sucked. South Carolina was decent, but nothing special.

    This doesn't really help your point.
    Huh? I wasn't arguing about the strength of the SEC. I was merely pointing out how Missouri made the conference title game.

    The SEC was overrated last year. Florida, Georgia, and A&M weren't as good as anticipated. Then again, Missouri and Auburn were better than expected. It balanced out, but it wasn't the SEC's strongest year.

    The SEC gets more players to the NFL compared to any other conference. It's the best conference and has been for awhile.
    Asu went to the pac 12 title game last year. Enough said on that
    I know you're being truthful but Notre Dame was the REAL Pac-12 South champion last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    see that Bama is basically a semi-pro team, then I can't help you.

    Bama is no more talented than usc, Texas, Ohio st, Florida st, UCLA, LSU or Miami (with a good coach).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    PurpleJ said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    PurpleJ said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Fuck your tide, they have 12 returning starters, a 6-5 statue in Cocker who hasn't tickled a centers balls and everyone (ESPN, the owner of the college football ripoff) is projecting them #1. Don't let Georgia, SC or Auburn get in the way.

    Nobody is getting out of the pac12 alive (Unless your Oregon with a Nike schedule). Someone will get out of the SEC undefeated because it's only 6-deep. Then a second SEC team will get in over a 1 - loss pac12 team because of the ESPN lobby. Just watch. Again, fuck your tide!

    My Crimson Tide have 3 of the last 5 national championships. Doog.
    How can you not win 3 titles when you play 2 difficult games a year and a free pass to every title game? Then play one team, in your own conference, who you already beat comfortably during the regular season? Then play a ND team that squeaked by Pitt in 3 overtimes another year? Those national titles were flukes and given to Saban on a silver platter
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy fuckall
    On a side note, quit using my words (holy fuckall). You dont even use it correctly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    The SEC is slightly better than the Pac 12 most years, say 5.81% better? They've had a good run of success, but look for that to end shortly, and for Big 12, Pac 12, and Big 10 teams to start winning titles again.


    About fucking time. Southerners are annoying 81.5% of the time.

    Beatififul chit Slice. Spot on. These young SEC fans don't realize how little they won the title prior to the last 7 years and before the BCS - SEC love affair. Championships were spread out evenly amongst conferences

    college football hasn't changed, the SEC hasn't gotten better...College football has exploded in popularity and the SEC - ESPN - brainwashing machine has gotten better. Now dat's da fact Jack!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738 Founders Club
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:



    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    The SEC is slightly better than the Pac 12 most years, say 5.81% better? They've had a good run of success, but look for that to end shortly, and for Big 12, Pac 12, and Big 10 teams to start winning titles again.


    About fucking time. Southerners are annoying 81.5% of the time.

    Beatififul chit Slice. Spot on. These young SEC fans don't realize how little they won the title prior to the last 7 years and before the BCS - SEC love affair. Championships were spread out evenly amongst conferences

    college football hasn't changed, the SEC hasn't gotten better...College football has exploded in popularity and the SEC - ESPN - brainwashing machine has gotten better. Now dat's da fact Jack!
    PGOS and PL_SS are in agreement. Sure sign the apocalypse is upon us. Buy beans, bullion, and bullets quickly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    PurpleJ said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    PurpleJ said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Fuck your tide, they have 12 returning starters, a 6-5 statue in Cocker who hasn't tickled a centers balls and everyone (ESPN, the owner of the college football ripoff) is projecting them #1. Don't let Georgia, SC or Auburn get in the way.

    Nobody is getting out of the pac12 alive (Unless your Oregon with a Nike schedule). Someone will get out of the SEC undefeated because it's only 6-deep. Then a second SEC team will get in over a 1 - loss pac12 team because of the ESPN lobby. Just watch. Again, fuck your tide!

    My Crimson Tide have 3 of the last 5 national championships. Doog.
    How can you not win 3 titles when you play 2 difficult games a year and a free pass to every title game? Then play one team, in your own conference, who you already beat comfortably during the regular season? Then play a ND team that squeaked by Pitt in 3 overtimes another year? Those national titles were flukes and given to Saban on a silver platter
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy fuckall
    On a side note, quit using my words (holy fuckall). You dont even use it correctly.
    Fucking boof puppy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chrisvashon
    chrisvashon Member Posts: 627
    This has been a tough thread for the SEC fluffers.

    One of the worst games I last year was miss st vs auburn. My god, what a dreckfest.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,163
    Swaye said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:



    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    The SEC is slightly better than the Pac 12 most years, say 5.81% better? They've had a good run of success, but look for that to end shortly, and for Big 12, Pac 12, and Big 10 teams to start winning titles again.


    About fucking time. Southerners are annoying 81.5% of the time.

    Beatififul chit Slice. Spot on. These young SEC fans don't realize how little they won the title prior to the last 7 years and before the BCS - SEC love affair. Championships were spread out evenly amongst conferences

    college football hasn't changed, the SEC hasn't gotten better...College football has exploded in popularity and the SEC - ESPN - brainwashing machine has gotten better. Now dat's da fact Jack!
    PGOS and PL_SS are in agreement. Sure sign the apocalypse is upon us. Buy beans, bullion, and bullets quickly.
    PLSS and I were always in agreement that anal sex with busty broads is a worthwhile endeavor.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    chrisvashon said:

    This has been a tough thread for the SEC fluffers.

    One of the worst games I last year was miss st vs auburn. My god, what a dreckfest.

    Did you get a chance to see Colorado/Cal last year?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chrisvashon
    chrisvashon Member Posts: 627
    PurpleJ said:

    chrisvashon said:

    This has been a tough thread for the SEC fluffers.

    One of the worst games I last year was miss st vs auburn. My god, what a dreckfest.

    Did you get a chance to see Colorado/Cal last year?
    I did. Equal amount of dreck. But, last I checked, cal didn't beat Alabama & play for a national championship. They got rolled by every legit team they faced.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    chrisvashon said:

    PurpleJ said:

    chrisvashon said:

    This has been a tough thread for the SEC fluffers.

    One of the worst games I last year was miss st vs auburn. My god, what a dreckfest.

    Did you get a chance to see Colorado/Cal last year?
    I did. Equal amount of dreck. But, last I checked, cal didn't beat Alabama & play for a national championship. They got rolled by every legit team they faced.
    Auburn wasn't very good early in the year. They got better as the season went on and managed to beat some very good teams. They also gave FSU quite a game if I recall.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Bump
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    PurpleJ said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Fuck your tide, they have 12 returning starters, a 6-5 statue in Cocker who hasn't tickled a centers balls and everyone (ESPN, the owner of the college football ripoff) is projecting them #1. Don't let Georgia, SC or Auburn get in the way.

    Nobody is getting out of the pac12 alive (Unless your Oregon with a Nike schedule). Someone will get out of the SEC undefeated because it's only 6-deep. Then a second SEC team will get in over a 1 - loss pac12 team because of the ESPN lobby. Just watch. Again, fuck your tide!

    My Crimson Tide have 3 of the last 5 national championships. Doog.
    How can you not win 3 titles when you play 2 difficult games a year and a free pass to every title game? Then play one team, in your own conference, who you already beat comfortably during the regular season? Then play a ND team that squeaked by Pitt in 3 overtimes another year? Those national titles were flukes and given to Saban on a silver platter
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Let's look at the OOC schedules of teams that played the SEC in the title game. Shall we?

    2013 FSU: @Pitt, Nevada, Bethune-Cookman, Florida (SEC teams don't play anyone, though)
    2012 Notre Dame: Independent school. Argument isn't valid here. Definitely earned their spot, but got raped by Bama.
    2011: The infamous all-SEC title game... Bama played at Penn St. and LSU beat Oregon OOC
    2010 Oregon: New Mexico, @Tennessee (SEC teams don't play anyone, though), Portland St.
    2009 Texas: Louisiana-Monroe, @Wyoming, UTEP, Central Florida
    2008: Chattanooga, Cincinnati, UW (0-12 baby!!!), TCU
    2007 Ohio St: Youngstown St. Akron, @Washington , Kent St.
    2006 Ohio St: Northern Illinois, @Texas, Cincinnati, Bowling Green
    2003 Oklahoma: North Texas, @Alabama (SEC teams don't play anyone, though), UCLA
    1998 FSU: Texas A/M, USC, @Miami, Florida (one loss team, but also played the toughest schedule on this list)

    As you can see, most of the teams that "earned" their trip to the title game versus SEC opponents played cupcake schedules OOC, save for 1998 FSU, 2003 Oklahoma, and Notre Dame in 2012.


    You're wasting your time with PLSS and Bill. I laid out last years OOC schedules and showed that the SEC played as tough or tougher of a schedule as anyone. They'll just ignore facts.

    PLSS I understand. I don't know why Bill is such a retard about it though.
    That's one fucking year. You're completely missing the long term trend. This didn't start in 2012. Do I need to dredge out the OOC schedules from 2006, 2007, 2008 etc.? Like Puppy said, if every conference was treated equally every year, I wouldn't be bitching about it. That hasn't been the case though.
    Hey dumbfuck... Are you gonna give the ACC shit? Oh wait, they aren't winning championships. So you can't really be jealous of them like the SEC.

    sports.yahoo.com/news/power-conference-schools-schedule-more-173800620--ncaaf.html

    All of the conferences have been doing it for a while, save for the Pac. We came on late.

    I also find it interesting how the SEC played more power conference OOC opponents than the Big 12, Big 10 and Pac 12 over the period between 2007-2012.

    FCS opponents
    ACC: 13 in 2012, 13 in 2011, 13 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 14 in 2008 and 7 in 2007, for a total of 74.
    SEC: 15 in 2012, 12 in 2011, 11 in 2010, 11 in 2009, 9 in 2008 and 9 in 2007, for a total of 67.
    Big Ten: 8 in 2012, 10 in 2011, 10 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 9 in 2008 and 8 in 2007, for a total of 54.
    Big 12: 9 in 2012, 6 in 2011, 8 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 10 in 2008 and 8 in 2007, for a total of 50.
    Big East: 9 in 2012, 8 in 2011, 8 in 2010, 9 in 2009, 7 in 2008 and 7 in 2007, for a total of 48.
    Pac-12: 9 in 2012, 8 in 2011, 7 in 2010, 4 in 2009, 2 in 2008 and 2 in 2007, for a total of 32.
    National totals: 63 in 2012, 57 in 2011, 57 in 2010, 56 in 2009, 51 in 2008 and 41 in 2007.

    Big Six nonconference opponents
    ACC: 23 in 2012, 20 in 2011, 19 in 2010, 20 in 2009, 23 in 2008 and 22 in 2007, for a total of 127.
    Big East: 16 in 2012, 16 in 2011, 15 in 2010, 16 in 2009, 16 in 2008 and 15 in 2007, for a total of 94.
    SEC: 14 in 2012, 12 in 2011, 16 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 15 in 2008 and 14 in 2007, for a total of 85.
    Big Ten: 15 in 2012, 14 in 2011, 12 in 2010, 14 in 2009, 13 in 2008 and 13 in 2007, for a total of 81.
    Pac-12: 11 in 2012, 16 in 2011, 14 in 2010, 15 in 2009, 14 in 2008 and 11 in 2007, for a total of 81.
    Big 12: 9 in 2012, 9 in 2011, 12 in 2010, 11 in 2009, 15 in 2008 and 11 in 2007, for a total of 67.
    National totals: 88 in 2012, 87 in 2011, 88 in 2010, 90 in 2009, 96 in 2008 and 86 in 2007.


    Yeah, they don't play anyone.
    LOL, you're ignoring the fact they have more teams and play more out of conference games. Try again.
    You could make the same argument for the amount of FCS games they play. More OOC games means they play less FCS teams per school.
    They're still playing a lot per school. 1.07 per school in 2012. DNC said that... I think...
    Just kneel down and kiss the rings bitch. You can't argue with their record in big games.


    I'll make sure to bump this thread after the SEC tears it up again this year. Roll Tide!!!!
    Premature bump.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,017
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    Bump in honor of #myKentuckyWildcats playing at Mizzou (ILTCMMIWILTD) today.

    I love it when you and Grundle do this shit.

    #therealhistorians

    #sorry @YellowSnow
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,217 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    Bump in honor of #myKentuckyWildcats playing at Mizzou (ILTCMMIWILTD) today.

    I love it when you and Grundle do this shit.

    #therealhistorians

    #sorry @YellowSnow
    @GrundleStiltzkin is the most historically literate illiterate I know. Respeck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    creepycoug said:

    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    Bump in honor of #myKentuckyWildcats playing at Mizzou (ILTCMMIWILTD) today.

    I love it when you and Grundle do this shit.

    #therealhistorians

    #sorry @YellowSnow
    @GrundleStiltzkin is the most historically literate illiterate I know. Respeck.
    Uh, thanks?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter