Redacted | Building 7
Comments
-
Imagine knowing how much bullshit our government pulls to orchestrate wars and then refuse to ask questions about what got us? into a 5T nation building sand storm for 20 years
-
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
-
Me46XiJCAB said:Who could have guessed Pawz is a conspiracy nut?
-
Exactly. EXACTLY.46XiJCAB said:
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.
3 months. Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.pawz said:
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous post
https://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
-
I’m just trying to help you debunk this BS.Blueduck said:
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway. -
Dear lord you really believe it was demolished.pawz said:
Exactly. EXACTLY.46XiJCAB said:
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.
3 months. Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.pawz said:
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous posthttps://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
I’m sorry. -
46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit. -
Fuck off, Liz.46XiJCAB said:
Dear lord you really believe it was demolished.pawz said:
Exactly. EXACTLY.46XiJCAB said:
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.
3 months. Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.pawz said:
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous posthttps://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
I’m sorry.
Maybe it’s tim for you to move to Delta Park where your dumb ass belongs.
-
You know you must be a dumb fuck when Mello is cheering you on.haie said:46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
Delta Park. Belongs.
-
Delta Park bums would run circles around 46FS.pawz said:
You know you must be a dumb fuck when Mello is cheering you on.haie said:46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
Delta Park. Belongs. -
Pawz thinks you’re smart.haie said:
Delta Park bums would run circles around 46FS.pawz said:
You know you must be a dumb fuck when Mello is cheering you on.haie said:46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
Delta Park. Belongs.
Chringe. -
Conspiracy nut has thoughts.pawz said:
Fuck off, Liz.46XiJCAB said:
Dear lord you really believe it was demolished.pawz said:
Exactly. EXACTLY.46XiJCAB said:
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.
3 months. Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.pawz said:
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous posthttps://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
I’m sorry.
Maybe it’s tim for you to move to Delta Park where your dumb ass belongs. -
All of you “contributions” are about me.haie said:46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
Rent Free MFer.
Rent Free!
LOL….. -
Even Mello can spot a conspiracy nut. Give it some thought.pawz said:
You know you must be a dumb fuck when Mello is cheering you on.haie said:46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
Delta Park. Belongs. -
Hey Pawz, was the Moon landing real?
-
Devs?
-
5 spot
-
46XiJCAB said:
Pawz thinks you’re smart.haie said:
Delta Park bums would run circles around 46FS.pawz said:
You know you must be a dumb fuck when Mello is cheering you on.haie said:46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
Delta Park. Belongs.
Chringe.46XiJCAB said:
Pawz thinks you’re smart.haie said:
Delta Park bums would run circles around 46FS.pawz said:
You know you must be a dumb fuck when Mello is cheering you on.haie said:46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
Delta Park. Belongs.
Chringe.46XiJCAB said:
Conspiracy nut has thoughts.pawz said:
Fuck off, Liz.46XiJCAB said:
Dear lord you really believe it was demolished.pawz said:
Exactly. EXACTLY.46XiJCAB said:
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.
3 months. Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.pawz said:
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous posthttps://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
I’m sorry.
Maybe it’s tim for you to move to Delta Park where your dumb ass belongs.46XiJCAB said:
All of you “contributions” are about me.haie said:46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
Rent Free MFer.
Rent Free!
LOL…..46XiJCAB said:
Even Mello can spot a conspiracy nut. Give it some thought.pawz said:
You know you must be a dumb fuck when Mello is cheering you on.haie said:46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
Delta Park. Belongs.
Epic meltdown. Liz is not stable.46XiJCAB said:Hey Pawz, was the Moon landing real?
#DeltaPark
-
Most people don't know the names of missiles. Scud was on the TV about a million times.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway. -
Im not asking for your help46XiJCAB said:
I’m just trying to help you debunk this BS.Blueduck said:
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
Back on page 1 I linked a couple documentary videos, I hope you go back and take the time to watch them. There are many independent expert architectural engineers in those videos who weigh in on the world trade center building(s) collapse and the official government report on 911.
If not.... that's your choice. -
Liz does not support free choice.Blueduck said:
Im not asking for your help46XiJCAB said:
I’m just trying to help you debunk this BS.Blueduck said:
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
Back on page 1 I linked a couple documentary videos, I hope you go back and take the time to watch them. There are many independent expert architectural engineers in those videos who weigh in on the world trade center building(s) collapse and the official government report on 911.
If not.... that's your choice.
-
You can lead a horse to water....pawz said:
Liz does not support free choice.Blueduck said:
Im not asking for your help46XiJCAB said:
I’m just trying to help you debunk this BS.Blueduck said:
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
Back on page 1 I linked a couple documentary videos, I hope you go back and take the time to watch them. There are many independent expert architectural engineers in those videos who weigh in on the world trade center building(s) collapse and the official government report on 911.
If not.... that's your choice. -
And popular mechanics debunked them years ago.Blueduck said:
Im not asking for your help46XiJCAB said:
I’m just trying to help you debunk this BS.Blueduck said:
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
Back on page 1 I linked a couple documentary videos, I hope you go back and take the time to watch them. There are many independent expert architectural engineers in those videos who weigh in on the world trade center building(s) collapse and the official government report on 911.
If not.... that's your choice. -
Bingo! The TC’s were a unique design with the floors attached to the outer walls.Goduckies said:
And popular mechanics debunked them years ago.Blueduck said:
Im not asking for your help46XiJCAB said:
I’m just trying to help you debunk this BS.Blueduck said:
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
Back on page 1 I linked a couple documentary videos, I hope you go back and take the time to watch them. There are many independent expert architectural engineers in those videos who weigh in on the world trade center building(s) collapse and the official government report on 911.
If not.... that's your choice.
When the metal brackets melted, the floors pancaked one on the other.
That’s why they fell into their footprints for the most part and didn’t topple over like trees.
#YeahButStill -
#1. produce the articleGoduckies said:
And popular mechanics debunked them years ago.Blueduck said:
Im not asking for your help46XiJCAB said:
I’m just trying to help you debunk this BS.Blueduck said:
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
Back on page 1 I linked a couple documentary videos, I hope you go back and take the time to watch them. There are many independent expert architectural engineers in those videos who weigh in on the world trade center building(s) collapse and the official government report on 911.
If not.... that's your choice.
#2 explain why you believe an article in a magazine over a large group of credentialed architects, professors, engineers and demolition experts with years of experience working in the field and have actual degrees in designing building and demolition of high rise buildings and have to know and how these buildings collapse and study structural integrity before they can ever build their designs.
A group of experts in their respective fields that has read the official reports and studied all the evidence that was available on the WTC buildings and give their opinions and put their credibility on the line.
Are you going to put all your eggs in the popular mechanics basket or would you want to see/hear from people who are experts and not on the government payroll.
-
I think the jets took down the buildings pretty much as the story goes. No detonation or conspiracy. Just jet fuel and high speed crashes
The conspiracy was the CIA and the Saudis inventing AQ and the Taliban to fight the Soviets. No attacks inside Saudi Arabia in return for financing
The dog got off the leash. That's why it was 11 Saudis. If Osama could get the US to blame and attack the Saudis all the better
But the CIA was in the oval office so we started two other wars instead
-
RaceBannon said:
I think the jets took down the buildings pretty much as the story goes. No detonation or conspiracy. Just jet fuel and high speed crashes
The conspiracy was the CIA and the Saudis inventing AQ and the Taliban to fight the Soviets. No attacks inside Saudi Arabia in return for financing
The dog got off the leash. That's why it was 11 Saudis. If Osama could get the US to blame and attack the Saudis all the better
But the CIA was in the oval office so we started two other wars instead -
It was a war of profit. Just ask Cheney.hardhat said:RaceBannon said:I think the jets took down the buildings pretty much as the story goes. No detonation or conspiracy. Just jet fuel and high speed crashes
The conspiracy was the CIA and the Saudis inventing AQ and the Taliban to fight the Soviets. No attacks inside Saudi Arabia in return for financing
The dog got off the leash. That's why it was 11 Saudis. If Osama could get the US to blame and attack the Saudis all the better
But the CIA was in the oval office so we started two other wars instead -
Liz or Dick?46XiJCAB said:
It was a war of profit. Just ask Cheney.hardhat said:RaceBannon said:I think the jets took down the buildings pretty much as the story goes. No detonation or conspiracy. Just jet fuel and high speed crashes
The conspiracy was the CIA and the Saudis inventing AQ and the Taliban to fight the Soviets. No attacks inside Saudi Arabia in return for financing
The dog got off the leash. That's why it was 11 Saudis. If Osama could get the US to blame and attack the Saudis all the better
But the CIA was in the oval office so we started two other wars instead
