The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard. The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research. There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon. He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway. You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard. The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research. There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Exactly. Where the fuck are the engines? A ball of steel the size of a VW Beetle doesn’t just disintegrate. You would need a nuclear explosion for that.
Further, why did the FBI go confiscate 80+ surveillance videos around the pentagon and destroy them? Then release basically a half-dozen grainy frames that don’t really show anything?
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard. The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research. There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon. He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway. You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
Imagine knowing how much bullshit our government pulls to orchestrate wars and then refuse to ask questions about what got us? into a 5T nation building sand storm for 20 years
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard. The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research. There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon. He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway. You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard. The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research. There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon. He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway. You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard. The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research. There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon. He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway. You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard. The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research. There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon. He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway. You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard. The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research. There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon. He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway. You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
You know you must be a dumb fuck when Mello is cheering you on.
Comments
https://www.howitworksdaily.com/building-demolition-explained/
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked. 3 months. Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
LOL..z
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
Hope this helps.
I’m sorry.
Incredible chit.
Maybe it’s tim for you to move to Delta Park where your dumb ass belongs.
Delta Park. Belongs.