jesus christ, you motherfuckers are dooging it up. Yeah, he was no good! It was all hype! "Cases involving stealing"? You sound like a bunch of jilted lovers.
jesus christ, you motherfuckers are dooging it up. Yeah, he was no good! It was all hype! "Cases involving stealing"? You sound like a bunch of jilted lovers.
Next stop: Ellensburg
With or without Shirley, CWU still doesn't beat Bellevue.
I never get too bummed when a player transfers. We have 85 scholarships for a reason, and we only get players for 4 years anyways. Who gives a fuck if we lose a pass rushing specialist who only had one year left to play? Frees up a scholarship.
Shirley would have likely come into his senior year as 4th string at his position that doesn't exist anymore (behind Kikaha, Littleton, and Farria)
Shirley was good at getting sacks when the opposing offensive line forgot to block him. Any contact though and UW might as well of had 10 players on the field
jesus christ, you motherfuckers are dooging it up. Yeah, he was no good! It was all hype! "Cases involving stealing"? You sound like a bunch of jilted lovers.
Next stop: Ellensburg
With or without Shirley, CWU still doesn't beat Bellevue.
jesus christ, you motherfuckers are dooging it up. Yeah, he was no good! It was all hype! "Cases involving stealing"? You sound like a bunch of jilted lovers.
Next stop: Ellensburg
With or without Shirley, CWU still doesn't beat Bellevue.
I never get too bummed when a player transfers. We have 85 scholarships for a reason, and we only get players for 4 years anyways. Who gives a fuck if we lose a pass rushing specialist who only had one year left to play? Frees up a scholarship.
I believe we are already under the 85 limit. Shirley is a senior, meaning his scholarship would be freed up after the season. All Shirley leaving will do is give a walk-on a scholarship for the season.
Shirley leaving hardly matters, but it is the offseason, so at least it's something football related to talk about. Now losing Taylor Hindy is great because he was terrible and it will free up a scholarship.
jesus christ, you motherfuckers are dooging it up. Yeah, he was no good! It was all hype! "Cases involving stealing"? You sound like a bunch of jilted lovers.
Next stop: Ellensburg
No one cares about the fagball they play in Ellensburg. HTH.
It appears that Shirley can use the Oregon basketball rule to transfer anywhere he wants because he's graduated. The rumor is....
Back to UCLA
So UCLA wants a guy with his kind of production? Why? That's what I thought.
If you have an open scholarship, you are getting a guy with 18 career sacks. He's a senior and if he doesn't work out, you bury him on the depth chart. There's very little downside. Maybe he provides depth so a freshman can redshirt. He had 3 last year because he hardly played and fell out of favor with the coaching staff. He's far from a great or complete player, but he's not terrible either.
It sounds like Peetamus is imploding. I am also hearing he is rubbing people the wrong way within the AD. It's just what I am hearing so no need to go and twist things, I didn't have to give you guys this information.
It sounds like Peetamus is imploding. I am also hearing he is rubbing people the wrong way within the AD. It's just what I am hearing so no need to go and twist things, I didn't have to give you guys this information.
It appears that Shirley can use the Oregon basketball rule to transfer anywhere he wants because he's graduated. The rumor is....
Back to UCLA
So UCLA wants a guy with his kind of production? Why? That's what I thought.
If you have an open scholarship, you are getting a guy with 18 career sacks. He's a senior and if he doesn't work out, you bury him on the depth chart. There's very little downside. Maybe he provides depth so a freshman can redshirt. He had 3 last year because he hardly played and fell out of favor with the coaching staff. He's far from a great or complete player, but he's not terrible either.
He's not terrible, no. Have you seen him play...he's marginal. I guess it depends what UCLA needs or any team needs. Seems like they would be better off giving any open scholarship to a previous walk on. I don't know UCLAs situation at DE. Plus, he has already been kicked out of UCLA.
My point is for UW, I don't think it is dooging it up to say, meh..
On the other hand, losing a guy like Stringfellow who will be playing in the NFL... ouch
I never get too bummed when a player transfers. We have 85 scholarships for a reason, and we only get players for 4 years anyways. Who gives a fuck if we lose a pass rushing specialist who only had one year left to play? Frees up a scholarship.
I believe we are already under the 85 limit. Shirley is a senior, meaning his scholarship would be freed up after the season. All Shirley leaving will do is give a walk-on a scholarship for the season.
Shirley leaving hardly matters, but it is the offseason, so at least it's something football related to talk about. Now losing Taylor Hindy is great because he was terrible and it will free up a scholarship.
My bad. Thought we were still at 86. Anyways....who the fuck cares?
8 solo tackles last year. 5 assisted. Those are Talia Crichton type numbers. Enough said on that. I doubt USC or UCLA would have him, even if he could transfer to a D1 school.
WDWSA, but Talia Crichton would piss all over himself for 8 tackles in a season.
Shirley's a one-trick pony that rushes the passer with a speed move.
As RoadDawg mentioned, he's not great but he's not terrible. He's not a waste of a roster spot on an 85 man roster ... but at the same time you're not relying on him to be great.
Comments
Next stop: Ellensburg
Shirley would have likely come into his senior year as 4th string at his position that doesn't exist anymore (behind Kikaha, Littleton, and Farria)
Shirley was good at getting sacks when the opposing offensive line forgot to block him. Any contact though and UW might as well of had 10 players on the field
Shirley leaving hardly matters, but it is the offseason, so at least it's something football related to talk about. Now losing Taylor Hindy is great because he was terrible and it will free up a scholarship.
Back to UCLA
Not to mention he was kicked out of UCLA the first time he went there.
We're lucky you even post here at all.
He's not terrible, no. Have you seen him play...he's marginal. I guess it depends what UCLA needs or any team needs. Seems like they would be better off giving any open scholarship to a previous walk on. I don't know UCLAs situation at DE. Plus, he has already been kicked out of UCLA.
My point is for UW, I don't think it is dooging it up to say, meh..
On the other hand, losing a guy like Stringfellow who will be playing in the NFL... ouch
As RoadDawg mentioned, he's not great but he's not terrible. He's not a waste of a roster spot on an 85 man roster ... but at the same time you're not relying on him to be great.