Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.
It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
Must
Defend
Everything
But TRUMP
Daddy
The girls aren't nominated to be a judge
Guess you didn't know either
Matchbook law school grad
Race pretends he knew the term.
If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.
Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?
It depends, Madam.
Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.
Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.
It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
Must
Defend
Everything
But TRUMP
Daddy
The girls aren't nominated to be a judge
Guess you didn't know either
Matchbook law school grad
Race pretends he knew the term.
If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.
Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?
It depends, Madam.
Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.
You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?
Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.
Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.
It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
Must
Defend
Everything
But TRUMP
Daddy
The girls aren't nominated to be a judge
Guess you didn't know either
Matchbook law school grad
Race pretends he knew the term.
If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.
Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?
It depends, Madam.
Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.
You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?
Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.
I'm not a lawyer. And apparently because you can't answer the question, neither are you, poopy pants.
Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.
It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
Must
Defend
Everything
But TRUMP
Daddy
The girls aren't nominated to be a judge
Guess you didn't know either
Matchbook law school grad
Race pretends he knew the term.
If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.
Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?
It depends, Madam.
Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.
You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?
Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.
I'm not a lawyer. And apparently because you can't answer the question, neither are you, poopy pants.
I answered it. My answer was correct.
You just don’t know as much as you think you do, Mildred.
Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.
It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
Must
Defend
Everything
But TRUMP
Daddy
The girls aren't nominated to be a judge
Guess you didn't know either
Matchbook law school grad
Race pretends he knew the term.
If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.
Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?
It depends, Madam.
Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.
You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?
Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.
I'm not a lawyer. And apparently because you can't answer the question, neither are you, poopy pants.
I answered it. My answer was correct.
You just don’t know as much as you think you do, Mildred.
Channeling your inner @MelloDawgFS by refusing to answer or use big words.
1. It’s not a term with same universal recognition as that enjoyed by Miranda such that it can accurately be described by the avg person or even lawyer. Those of us who declined the trial practice don’t remember anything from criminal or con law.
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
Actually, the Ivy League dodges this one. Black eye for Arizona law school IMO.
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?
You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.
Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?
You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.
Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?
You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.
Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
I know you thought it was 12.
Not always.
Sorry, Mabel.
Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?
You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.
Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
I know you thought it was 12.
Not always.
Sorry, Mabel.
Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?
You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.
Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
I know you thought it was 12.
Not always.
Sorry, Mabel.
Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?
You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.
Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
I know you thought it was 12.
Not always.
Sorry, Mabel.
Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?
You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.
Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
I know you thought it was 12.
Not always.
Sorry, Mabel.
Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.
I’ve now officially over-invested in this.
You can check out any time you want but you can never leave, @creepycoug
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.
I’ve now officially over-invested in this.
It's a stupid gotcha designed for the stupid in the stupid party. As you suspect, it was never a thing in law school, bar review, etc.
Our crooked cops on the bored know it from experience.
Comments
Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.
You just don’t know as much as you think you do, Mildred.
Too much winning.
Fuck off.
Go work on your Russian State narrative homework.
1. It’s not a term with same universal recognition as that enjoyed by Miranda such that it can accurately be described by the avg person or even lawyer. Those of us who declined the trial practice don’t remember anything from criminal or con law.
2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.
Actually, the Ivy League dodges this one. Black eye for Arizona law school IMO.
You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.
Or finish your Russian state narrative
briefhomework.Not always.
Sorry, Mabel.
Still unable to answer the question.
Cereal box top lawyer.
Still a cereal box pretend lawyer
I’ve now officially over-invested in this.
Our crooked cops on the bored know it from experience.
Your over investment is nothing compared to mine.