Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What do you want to bet that this guy also attended an Ivy League Law School

24

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    RaceBannon said:

    Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law

    Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

    It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

    So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

    Is the name or the principle more important?

    Don't hurt yourself.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

    Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

    Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

    It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

    Keep digging.
    "Your mother wears army boots!", cried Bob_C.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

    Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

    Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

    It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

    Keep digging.
    "Your mother wears army boots!", cried Bob_C.
    If it helped your team you'd let Biden shit in your mouth.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,639 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

    Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

    Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

    It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

    Keep digging.
    "Your mother wears army boots!", cried Bob_C.
    Meltdown
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

    Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

    Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

    It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

    Keep digging.
    "Your mother wears army boots!", cried Bob_C.
    Meltdown
    Appreciate your discretion.

    Facts are like Kryptonite, of course.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law

    Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

    It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

    So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

    Is the name or the principle more important?

    Don't hurt yourself.
    Biden didn't appoint me nor am I a sitting judge but good one I guess

    What did I say about your retarded argument?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law

    Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

    It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

    So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

    Is the name or the principle more important?

    Don't hurt yourself.
    Biden didn't appoint me nor am I a sitting judge but good one I guess

    What did I say about your retarded argument?
    I think avoiding the question was the right move for you.

    Can’t be too careful.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law

    Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

    It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

    So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

    Is the name or the principle more important?

    Don't hurt yourself.
    Biden didn't appoint me nor am I a sitting judge but good one I guess

    What did I say about your retarded argument?
    I think avoiding the question was the right move for you.

    Can’t be too careful.
    What question?

    Biden appointed a moron ignorant of the law

    I'm not a judge nor did Biden appoint me

    Keep chasing that rabbit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,427 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Fuck, I even know what that is.

    Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

    It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
    Every person that has ever casually followed criminal cases knows what it is.
    That is unmitigated bullshit.
    Just because you had to google it doesn’t mean I’m wrong.
    I actually looked to see how ubiquitous the term is. The answer is, not very.
    Bob_C 1, HH 0

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law

    Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

    It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

    So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

    Is the name or the principle more important?

    Don't hurt yourself.
    Biden didn't appoint me nor am I a sitting judge but good one I guess

    What did I say about your retarded argument?
    I think avoiding the question was the right move for you.

    Can’t be too careful.
    What question?

    Atta girl!

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law

    Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

    It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

    So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

    Is the name or the principle more important?

    Don't hurt yourself.
    Biden didn't appoint me nor am I a sitting judge but good one I guess

    What did I say about your retarded argument?
    I think avoiding the question was the right move for you.

    Can’t be too careful.
    What question?

    Biden appointed a moron ignorant of the law

    I'm not a judge nor did Biden appoint me

    Keep chasing that rabbit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law

    Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

    It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

    So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

    Is the name or the principle more important?

    Don't hurt yourself.
    Biden didn't appoint me nor am I a sitting judge but good one I guess

    What did I say about your retarded argument?
    I think avoiding the question was the right move for you.

    Can’t be too careful.
    What question?

    Atta girl!

    There's no rule that says you must humiliate yourself in every thread.
    Quite the rebuttal.

    #substantive!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,542 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler gargling Biden's balls - Yeah the guy is an unqualified AA appointment who doesn't know even the most basic parts of the job, but let me tell you why that's the a good thing.

    He only needs to know that he is a paid political hack and his job is to support dems. Of course, the dazzler says he supports the equal application of the law, it's just not a voting issue for him and certainly not a requirement for a federal judge. If a January 6th brady appeal hits this dudes desk, he already has his DENIED stamp ready.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    WestlinnDuck said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler gargling Biden's balls - Yeah the guy is an unqualified AA appointment who doesn't know even the most basic parts of the job, but let me tell you why that's the a good thing.

    He only needs to know that he is a paid political hack and his job is to support dems. Of course, the dazzler says he supports the equal application of the law, it's just not a voting issue for him and certainly not a requirement for a federal judge. If a January 6th brady appeal hits this dudes desk, he already has his DENIED stamp ready.
    Gasbag is playing some 4 dimensional stupid now.

    Try to keep up, ladies.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler gargling Biden's balls - Yeah the guy is an unqualified AA appointment who doesn't know even the most basic parts of the job, but let me tell you why that's the a good thing.

    He only needs to know that he is a paid political hack and his job is to support dems. Of course, the dazzler says he supports the equal application of the law, it's just not a voting issue for him and certainly not a requirement for a federal judge. If a January 6th brady appeal hits this dudes desk, he already has his DENIED stamp ready.
    Gasbag is playing some 4 dimensional stupid now.

    Try to keep up, ladies.
    Gurgle
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    edited March 2023
    trublue said:

    HH:

    Just because you were able to pass the WA Bar exam on your second attempt and you’re a “practicing” attorney doesn’t mean you know much about the law, specifically criminal law. That was well established as far back as eDuck days.

    You continue pretending you have some kind of superior intellect. No one is fooled. Sled spells out the truth of the matter and your response is to call him a “mall cop”.

    Specifically, what kind of law do you practice and who do you represent?

    Take the L and run along, Hack.

    Funny you mentioned the Bar Exam, Detective. If ever there was a time that this super important label that every (corrupt) cop knows should have come up it would have been in the Bar Review course. It didn’t.

    Of course the term is actually little used in most states, if it is used at all. Screaming that everyone knows the label it is a pathetic game played for rubes like yourself by your right wing influencers. Even as gotchas go, this one is pretty stupid.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    HH:

    Just because you were able to pass the WA Bar exam on your second attempt and you’re a “practicing” attorney doesn’t mean you know much about the law, specifically criminal law. That was well established as far back as eDuck days.

    You continue pretending you have some kind of superior intellect. No one is fooled. Sled spells out the truth of the matter and your response is to call him a “mall cop”.

    Specifically, what kind of law do you practice and who do you represent?

    Take the L and run along, Hack.

    Funny you mentioned the Bar Exam, Detective. If ever there was a time that this super important label that every (corrupt) cop knows should have come up it would have been in the Bar Review course.

    Of course the term is actually little used in most states, if it is used at all. Screaming that everyone knows the label it is a pathetic game played for rubes like yourself by your right wing influencers.
    Everyone who works in criminal law knows what a Brady motion is. It’s part of the day to day job.
    I’m sure you’re also not aware that turning over the disciplinary files of every special agent testifying in a case is also routine. Any investigations where their truthfulness is questioned removes them from testifying, i.e., prosecutor will not use them.

    Take a refresher course on criminal law, rules and procedures.

    BTW: Remember when you were so certain every FBI agent had a law degree?

    Who is the rube, you hack?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    trublue said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    HH:

    Just because you were able to pass the WA Bar exam on your second attempt and you’re a “practicing” attorney doesn’t mean you know much about the law, specifically criminal law. That was well established as far back as eDuck days.

    You continue pretending you have some kind of superior intellect. No one is fooled. Sled spells out the truth of the matter and your response is to call him a “mall cop”.

    Specifically, what kind of law do you practice and who do you represent?

    Take the L and run along, Hack.

    Funny you mentioned the Bar Exam, Detective. If ever there was a time that this super important label that every (corrupt) cop knows should have come up it would have been in the Bar Review course.

    Of course the term is actually little used in most states, if it is used at all. Screaming that everyone knows the label it is a pathetic game played for rubes like yourself by your right wing influencers.
    Everyone who works in criminal law knows what a Brady motion is. It’s part of the day to day job.
    I’m sure you’re also not aware that turning over the disciplinary files of every special agent testifying in a case is also routine. Any investigations where their truthfulness is questioned removes them from testifying, i.e., prosecutor will not use them.

    Take a refresher course on criminal law, rules and procedures.

    BTW: Remember when you were so certain every FBI agent had a law degree?

    Who is the rube, you hack?
    Part of your day to day job was hiding evidence? They say admitting it is the first step.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    trublue said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    HH:

    Just because you were able to pass the WA Bar exam on your second attempt and you’re a “practicing” attorney doesn’t mean you know much about the law, specifically criminal law. That was well established as far back as eDuck days.

    You continue pretending you have some kind of superior intellect. No one is fooled. Sled spells out the truth of the matter and your response is to call him a “mall cop”.

    Specifically, what kind of law do you practice and who do you represent?

    Take the L and run along, Hack.

    Funny you mentioned the Bar Exam, Detective. If ever there was a time that this super important label that every (corrupt) cop knows should have come up it would have been in the Bar Review course.

    Of course the term is actually little used in most states, if it is used at all. Screaming that everyone knows the label it is a pathetic game played for rubes like yourself by your right wing influencers.
    Everyone who works in criminal law knows what a Brady motion is. It’s part of the day to day job.
    I’m sure you’re also not aware that turning over the disciplinary files of every special agent testifying in a case is also routine. Any investigations where their truthfulness is questioned removes them from testifying, i.e., prosecutor will not use them.

    Take a refresher course on criminal law, rules and procedures.

    BTW: Remember when you were so certain every FBI agent had a law degree?

    Who is the rube, you hack?
    Good thing someone who is a judge does't need to know anything about criminal law.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,681 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    HH:

    Just because you were able to pass the WA Bar exam on your second attempt and you’re a “practicing” attorney doesn’t mean you know much about the law, specifically criminal law. That was well established as far back as eDuck days.

    You continue pretending you have some kind of superior intellect. No one is fooled. Sled spells out the truth of the matter and your response is to call him a “mall cop”.

    Specifically, what kind of law do you practice and who do you represent?

    Take the L and run along, Hack.

    Funny you mentioned the Bar Exam, Detective. If ever there was a time that this super important label that every (corrupt) cop knows should have come up it would have been in the Bar Review course. It didn’t.

    Of course the term is actually little used in most states, if it is used at all. Screaming that everyone knows the label it is a pathetic game played for rubes like yourself by your right wing influencers. Even as gotchas go, this one is pretty stupid.
    Funny when you'd bust two dudes having sex in public and one of them would say "I'm an attorney" but when asked for their bar card they'd refuse. Strange. So were you the pitcher or the catcher when I busted you Dazzler?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    HH:

    Just because you were able to pass the WA Bar exam on your second attempt and you’re a “practicing” attorney doesn’t mean you know much about the law, specifically criminal law. That was well established as far back as eDuck days.

    You continue pretending you have some kind of superior intellect. No one is fooled. Sled spells out the truth of the matter and your response is to call him a “mall cop”.

    Specifically, what kind of law do you practice and who do you represent?

    Take the L and run along, Hack.

    Funny you mentioned the Bar Exam, Detective. If ever there was a time that this super important label that every (corrupt) cop knows should have come up it would have been in the Bar Review course. It didn’t.

    Of course the term is actually little used in most states, if it is used at all. Screaming that everyone knows the label it is a pathetic game played for rubes like yourself by your right wing influencers. Even as gotchas go, this one is pretty stupid.
    Funny when you'd bust two dudes having sex in public and one of them would say "I'm an attorney" but when asked for their bar card they'd refuse. Strange. So were you the pitcher or the catcher when I busted you Dazzler?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    edited March 2023
    You could do better . . . You already have the Fuck Off record (31K) that will never be broken. Why do you even bother?

    Admitting you’re an asshole and rarely funny is the first step.

    How can you be wrong on virtually every (criminal) legal topic and shamelessly run your mouth?

    Hands Up, Don’t Shoot MFer!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Fuck, I even know what that is.

    Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

    It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
    Must

    Defend

    Everything

    But TRUMP

    Daddy

    The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

    Guess you didn't know either

    Matchbook law school grad
    Race pretends he knew the term.

    If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
    Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Fuck, I even know what that is.

    Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

    It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
    Must

    Defend

    Everything

    But TRUMP

    Daddy

    The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

    Guess you didn't know either

    Matchbook law school grad
    Race pretends he knew the term.

    If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
    Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
    Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Fuck, I even know what that is.

    Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

    It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
    Must

    Defend

    Everything

    But TRUMP

    Daddy

    The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

    Guess you didn't know either

    Matchbook law school grad
    Race pretends he knew the term.

    If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
    Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
    Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
    Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

    Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

    It depends, Madam.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter