Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Can we offer this Ukranian solider a scholarship?
Comments
-
You need to study history and US involvement in foreign conflicts.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That was the UN and a travesty.46XiJCAB said:
Yes they also did a bag up job in Rwanda. There’s only one propagandist here and he’s too ignorant to see it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Like I said, completely delusional Russian propaganda.46XiJCAB said:
I knew it would fly over your head. It’s not about the nukes alone. It was about putting a threat 90 miles from the US.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We actually helped pull nukes from Ukraine so this analogy makes no sense46XiJCAB said:I remember when Russia tried to put Nukes 90 miles from Florida. The US didn’t like that very much. Nearly led to nuclear war. But NATO courting Ukraine shouldn’t concern Russia.
Action>>>>>Reaction.
Right or wrong, to ignore this fact is ignorant.
Russia propaganda!
Simple minded retort.
NATO is a defensive treaty designed to prevent....Russian invasions
But Russia viewing a NATO aligned Ukraine as a potential threat can not even be a consideration.
This is where you scream.........
Russia Propaganda!
NATO is not an aggressor.
It has never been an aggressor.
It helped stopped genocide in Serbia/Bosnia.
I'm sure you also hated that.
You need to learn to not equate every situation to a past one. They are all different -
I have46XiJCAB said:
You need to study history and US involvement in foreign conflicts.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That was the UN and a travesty.46XiJCAB said:
Yes they also did a bag up job in Rwanda. There’s only one propagandist here and he’s too ignorant to see it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Like I said, completely delusional Russian propaganda.46XiJCAB said:
I knew it would fly over your head. It’s not about the nukes alone. It was about putting a threat 90 miles from the US.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We actually helped pull nukes from Ukraine so this analogy makes no sense46XiJCAB said:I remember when Russia tried to put Nukes 90 miles from Florida. The US didn’t like that very much. Nearly led to nuclear war. But NATO courting Ukraine shouldn’t concern Russia.
Action>>>>>Reaction.
Right or wrong, to ignore this fact is ignorant.
Russia propaganda!
Simple minded retort.
NATO is a defensive treaty designed to prevent....Russian invasions
But Russia viewing a NATO aligned Ukraine as a potential threat can not even be a consideration.
This is where you scream.........
Russia Propaganda!
NATO is not an aggressor.
It has never been an aggressor.
It helped stopped genocide in Serbia/Bosnia.
I'm sure you also hated that.
You need to learn to not equate every situation to a past one. They are all different
Have you looked up Russian history and foreign conflicts? -
Doesn’t read like you have. You’re cheerleading the slaughter of Ukrainians because you have a hard on for Putin. You ignore anything that doesn’t fit your narrative.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I have46XiJCAB said:
You need to study history and US involvement in foreign conflicts.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That was the UN and a travesty.46XiJCAB said:
Yes they also did a bag up job in Rwanda. There’s only one propagandist here and he’s too ignorant to see it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Like I said, completely delusional Russian propaganda.46XiJCAB said:
I knew it would fly over your head. It’s not about the nukes alone. It was about putting a threat 90 miles from the US.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We actually helped pull nukes from Ukraine so this analogy makes no sense46XiJCAB said:I remember when Russia tried to put Nukes 90 miles from Florida. The US didn’t like that very much. Nearly led to nuclear war. But NATO courting Ukraine shouldn’t concern Russia.
Action>>>>>Reaction.
Right or wrong, to ignore this fact is ignorant.
Russia propaganda!
Simple minded retort.
NATO is a defensive treaty designed to prevent....Russian invasions
But Russia viewing a NATO aligned Ukraine as a potential threat can not even be a consideration.
This is where you scream.........
Russia Propaganda!
NATO is not an aggressor.
It has never been an aggressor.
It helped stopped genocide in Serbia/Bosnia.
I'm sure you also hated that.
You need to learn to not equate every situation to a past one. They are all different
Have you looked up Russian history and foreign conflicts?
It’s like you can’t walk and chew gum at the same time. This thing should be over but Boris Johnson saw to it that that wouldn’t happen last year.
Wake the hell up. -
Now do Afghanistan and Iraq and let us know how Team America, World's Police is doing? South Africa is about to go tits up. We need our guys to go in there and fix it? Or just let in a few million refugees and start writing checks on our non-existent bank account?46XiJCAB said:
Yes they also did a bag up job in Rwanda. There’s only one propagandist here and he’s too ignorant to see it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Like I said, completely delusional Russian propaganda.46XiJCAB said:
I knew it would fly over your head. It’s not about the nukes alone. It was about putting a threat 90 miles from the US.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We actually helped pull nukes from Ukraine so this analogy makes no sense46XiJCAB said:I remember when Russia tried to put Nukes 90 miles from Florida. The US didn’t like that very much. Nearly led to nuclear war. But NATO courting Ukraine shouldn’t concern Russia.
Action>>>>>Reaction.
Right or wrong, to ignore this fact is ignorant.
Russia propaganda!
Simple minded retort.
NATO is a defensive treaty designed to prevent....Russian invasions
But Russia viewing a NATO aligned Ukraine as a potential threat can not even be a consideration.
This is where you scream.........
Russia Propaganda!
NATO is not an aggressor.
It has never been an aggressor.
It helped stopped genocide in Serbia/Bosnia.
I'm sure you also hated that. -
My mistake but that was the UN. Still an org that does nothing when it doesn’t fit the politics. I quote a former NATO General speaking just last year and PGOS screams Russia propaganda.WestlinnDuck said:
Now do Afghanistan and Iraq and let us know how Team America, World's Police is doing? South Africa is about to go tits up? We need our guys to go in there and fix it? Or just let in a few million refugees and start writing checks on our non-existent bank account?46XiJCAB said:
Yes they also did a bag up job in Rwanda. There’s only one propagandist here and he’s too ignorant to see it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Like I said, completely delusional Russian propaganda.46XiJCAB said:
I knew it would fly over your head. It’s not about the nukes alone. It was about putting a threat 90 miles from the US.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We actually helped pull nukes from Ukraine so this analogy makes no sense46XiJCAB said:I remember when Russia tried to put Nukes 90 miles from Florida. The US didn’t like that very much. Nearly led to nuclear war. But NATO courting Ukraine shouldn’t concern Russia.
Action>>>>>Reaction.
Right or wrong, to ignore this fact is ignorant.
Russia propaganda!
Simple minded retort.
NATO is a defensive treaty designed to prevent....Russian invasions
But Russia viewing a NATO aligned Ukraine as a potential threat can not even be a consideration.
This is where you scream.........
Russia Propaganda!
NATO is not an aggressor.
It has never been an aggressor.
It helped stopped genocide in Serbia/Bosnia.
I'm sure you also hated that. -
NATO is a hollowed out shell. Years of under investment in troops and equipment and major investment in the NATO bureaucracy. Only Poland appears to actually give a sh*t. If the Germans aren't interested or serious about western European security, then I'm not interested either. If our leaders aren't serious about US border security, then I'm not serious about Ukraine border security.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31694/germany-has-fewer-than-10-tiger-and-12-nh90-helicopters-ready-for-combat
Germany Has Fewer Than 10 Tiger And 12 NH90 Helicopters Ready For Combat
Germany blames Airbus for the helicopters’ low availability, but it is the latest example of the country’s general continuing readiness woes.
BY
JOSEPH TREVITHICK
|
PUBLISHED JAN 2, 2020 3:16 PM
report has emerged that shows just 15 percent of Germany's Tiger attack helicopters and only around 12 percent of its NH90 transport helicopters were mission capable as of November 2019. The German Armed Forces, or Bundeswehr, has blamed Airbus, which provides contract maintenance services for both types, for the low availability rates, but this also comes as German authorities continue to struggle to improve readiness across the country's military.
German newspaper Bild
was first to report on the low readiness of the two German military helicopter types on Jan. 1, 2020. A leaked Bundeswehr report that the outlet obtained said that eight out of 53 Tigers and 12 of 99 NH90s were "ready-to-use." Germany took delivery of its first Tiger in 2005 from what was then known as Eurocopter, which morphed into Airbus Helicopters in 2014. The German military received the first NH90, which NHIndustries, a consortium that includes Airbus, produces, in 2006....
Low availability hasn't been limited to helicopters in recent years, with fixed-wing aircraft, ships, submarines, and more, having equally dismal mission capable rates. The German Air Force's Tornado combat jets, which are aging and in increasingly desperate need of replacement, have been one particular sore spot, with around 35 percent of the aircraft being combat ready as of 2017. Readiness rates for the country's newer Typhoon fighters haven't been significantly better, either.
Even more notably, by the end of 2017, none of Germany's six Type 212A subs were operational. This predicament persisted for months into the following year. -
I support The United States of America
PGOS supports traitors
Case closed -
Trump was messing with the grift.RaceBannon said:I support The United States of America
PGOS supports traitors
Case closed -
In August of 2016 Trump said Putin wasn’t going to go into Ukraine despite fucking Barry in the ass and charging into Crimea.
The media of course thought he was crazy and a Putin stooge. Sound familiar?
BTW, he didn’t when Trump was POTUS. This shit isn’t that hard. -
Citation needed.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
A good number of people in this threadBob_C said:
Who has defended anything that Russia has done?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sad to see so called Americans bend over backwards to defend Russia of all fucking places.SwisherSweetboy said:Weird thread going on here. Even the dimmest of bulbs in America must be seeing that we should not send one more fucking dollar to Ukraine now. Jesus. If it's a whoosh thread, well OK. But this PGOS cunt needs to own up to it.
