Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Chris Petersen continues to shatter doogFS myths

245

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    Not to jack the thread but I think Petersen is going to kill it overall and get off to a fast start with a better than expected season this year. The national consensus is 9-10 wins and some husky fans might think we can go 11-3. I think we go 12-2. Read between the lines in what many players have said. I think they play harder and better and I think the team will be closer together than last year. If Petersen is coaching last year we might have gone 11-2 instead of 9-4.

    Yea I don't see a Petersen coached team losing a game due to piss poor kickoffs like Sark did at Stanford. UCLA was really there for the taking but Sark was too immature of a coach to pull that one off. Down 10 with about 8 minutes to go facing a 4th and 2 on your 40? Easy call there but Sark not only goes for it but he has his backup QB throw a slant to Stringfellow who prior to that game wasn't seeing a ton of playing time.

    I have to question these "great" fans as well. For being such "great" fans these Doogs sure as fuck don't know our schedule. Every time I predict 10 wins I'm being treated like I'm such fucking lunatic for predicting Petersen will have us winning one more game than last year.

    I saw KrisvashonFS on her twitter say Petersen should win coach of the year if he goes 9-4. I see most Doogs are saying 8 wins as you can't expect a first year coach to just come in and win right away.

    I also think the Doogs are secretely hoping for 8 wins so they can go "See told you it takes time, told you Sark wasn't the problem". The Doogs loyalties to Sark far outweighs their loyalties to UW.

    I know for a fact if Kim could choose 8-5 or 10-3 he'd choose 8-5.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    Not to jack the thread but I think Petersen is going to kill it overall and get off to a fast start with a better than expected season this year. The national consensus is 9-10 wins and some husky fans might think we can go 11-3. I think we go 12-2. Read between the lines in what many players have said. I think they play harder and better and I think the team will be closer together than last year. If Petersen is coaching last year we might have gone 11-2 instead of 9-4.

    Yea I don't see a Petersen coached team losing a game due to piss poor kickoffs like Sark did at Stanford. UCLA was really there for the taking but Sark was too immature of a coach to pull that one off. Down 10 with about 8 minutes to go facing a 4th and 2 on your 40? Easy call there but Sark not only goes for it but he has his backup QB throw a slant to Stringfellow who prior to that game wasn't seeing a ton of playing time.

    I have to question these "great" fans as well. For being such "great" fans these Doogs sure as fuck don't know our schedule. Every time I predict 10 wins I'm being treated like I'm such fucking lunatic for predicting Petersen will have us winning one more game than last year.

    I saw KrisvashonFS on her twitter say Petersen should win coach of the year if he goes 9-4. I see most Doogs are saying 8 wins as you can't expect a first year coach to just come in and win right away.

    I also think the Doogs are secretely hoping for 8 wins so they can go "See told you it takes time, told you Sark wasn't the problem". The Doogs loyalties to Sark far outweighs their loyalties to UW.

    I know for a fact if Kim could choose 8-5 or 10-3 he'd choose 8-5.
    Shit, Kim would take 5-8 if it meant full access to the players and coaches, that guy cares more about his own inflated ego than watching a winning team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    For my sake I hope this pans out as spectacularly as the Doogs on this forum expect. I don't wan't to be inconvenienced by all the Aurora bridge divers when you go 8-4.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    MikeDamone said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    Met a couple of the players recently. One of them said they just couldn't really "buy in" with Sark and said the change with the coaching staff has been fantastic.

    Did every player speak about the difference?
    Stringfellow sure did. Hearing Petersen is just like Ty. Now I didn't say he is just like Ty just said he is acting just like Ty.

    Learn the fucking difference already.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    section8 said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    Not to jack the thread but I think Petersen is going to kill it overall and get off to a fast start with a better than expected season this year. The national consensus is 9-10 wins and some husky fans might think we can go 11-3. I think we go 12-2. Read between the lines in what many players have said. I think they play harder and better and I think the team will be closer together than last year. If Petersen is coaching last year we might have gone 11-2 instead of 9-4.

    Yea I don't see a Petersen coached team losing a game due to piss poor kickoffs like Sark did at Stanford. UCLA was really there for the taking but Sark was too immature of a coach to pull that one off. Down 10 with about 8 minutes to go facing a 4th and 2 on your 40? Easy call there but Sark not only goes for it but he has his backup QB throw a slant to Stringfellow who prior to that game wasn't seeing a ton of playing time.

    I have to question these "great" fans as well. For being such "great" fans these Doogs sure as fuck don't know our schedule. Every time I predict 10 wins I'm being treated like I'm such fucking lunatic for predicting Petersen will have us winning one more game than last year.

    I saw KrisvashonFS on her twitter say Petersen should win coach of the year if he goes 9-4. I see most Doogs are saying 8 wins as you can't expect a first year coach to just come in and win right away.

    I also think the Doogs are secretely hoping for 8 wins so they can go "See told you it takes time, told you Sark wasn't the problem". The Doogs loyalties to Sark far outweighs their loyalties to UW.

    I know for a fact if Kim could choose 8-5 or 10-3 he'd choose 8-5.
    Shit, Kim would take 0-13 if it meant full access to the players and coaches, that guy cares more about his own inflated ego than watching a winning team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,507 Founders Club
    I don't have much to add to this other than how pumped I am for this season with what feels like a completely different team. To go from this:

    (after 08) "On his way out of Pullman to the airport, Woodward pulled over where no one else was around and screamed into a field."

    ...to the article posted. UW finally gives a shit about football again something the alumni/students and especially the fans deserve.

    #NotTheSameExcitementAsTyandDudeBra
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,437 Founders Club
    The fact they won nine games and had to deal with 7 less feet in elevation....you guys are lucky Sark even coached here at all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter