Chris Petersen continues to shatter doogFS myths

Gladstone

From this excellent Columns article:

What does your decision to take the UW job say about where you’re at in your career?

I’ve known about the tradition and history of this program and had been such an admirer. All the things that I have gone through in my career have really established a strong philosophy of what’s important. The University of Washington really represented that. The people that support this place, the passion, and just the power of this place added up to be something that I wanted to be a part of.

PostGameOrangeSlices

It really is a travesty that this program is stuck with softy, kim, f3, and the rest of those fucking idiots.

[Deleted User]

Yes but who is UW going to hire that's better than Sark? Remember we were 0-12 just a few years back nobody is going go want to come here.


Then we hire Petersen. Did Doogs learn anything? Nope as they use the same nonsense towards Romar.

Gladstone

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Yes but who is UW going to hire that's better than Sark? Remember we were 0-12 just a few years back nobody is going go want to come here.


Then we hire Petersen. Did Doogs learn anything? Nope as they use the same nonsense towards Romar.

Football has changed too much since Don James. Those days are never coming back. Just be grateful Sark is here taking his 1%er salary.

[Deleted User]

I literally had one Doog tell me USC, UCLA, Oregon, Stanford, ASU and AZ all more desired jobs than UW. This was a day before Sark left when I said extending him is crazy.

It's funny how they are "great" fans and we are "shit" fans when they are the ones who constantly put down our program, the players, other assistant coaches. But we are shitty cause we only call out the shit head coach.

Tequilla

Fuck those idiotic Doogs ...

At some point you'd think people would realize that we're Washington DAMNIT.

HeretoBeatmyChest

Not to jack the thread but I think Petersen is going to kill it overall and get off to a fast start with a better than expected season this year. The national consensus is 9-10 wins and some husky fans might think we can go 11-3. I think we go 12-2. Read between the lines in what many players have said. I think they play harder and better and I think the team will be closer together than last year. If Petersen is coaching last year we might have gone 11-2 instead of 9-4.

MikeDamone

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Not to jack the thread but I think Petersen is going to kill it overall and get off to a fast start with a better than expected season this year. The national consensus is 9-10 wins and some husky fans might think we can go 11-3. I think we go 12-2. Read between the lines in what many players have said. I think they play harder and better and I think the team will be closer together than last year. If Petersen is coaching last year we might have gone 11-2 instead of 9-4.

LIPO

AtomicPiss

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Not to jack the thread but I think Petersen is going to kill it overall and get off to a fast start with a better than expected season this year. The national consensus is 9-10 wins and some husky fans might think we can go 11-3. I think we go 12-2. Read between the lines in what many players have said. I think they play harder and better and I think the team will be closer together than last year. If Petersen is coaching last year we might have gone 11-2 instead of 9-4.

my thoughts exactly

TierbsHsotBoobs

14-0 or get the fuck out.








12-2 would work.

CuntWaffle

I just don't see how anyone will want to play in Seattle with the rain and THIS economy.

[Deleted User]

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Not to jack the thread but I think Petersen is going to kill it overall and get off to a fast start with a better than expected season this year. The national consensus is 9-10 wins and some husky fans might think we can go 11-3. I think we go 12-2. Read between the lines in what many players have said. I think they play harder and better and I think the team will be closer together than last year. If Petersen is coaching last year we might have gone 11-2 instead of 9-4.

Yea I don't see a Petersen coached team losing a game due to piss poor kickoffs like Sark did at Stanford. UCLA was really there for the taking but Sark was too immature of a coach to pull that one off. Down 10 with about 8 minutes to go facing a 4th and 2 on your 40? Easy call there but Sark not only goes for it but he has his backup QB throw a slant to Stringfellow who prior to that game wasn't seeing a ton of playing time.

I have to question these "great" fans as well. For being such "great" fans these Doogs sure as fuck don't know our schedule. Every time I predict 10 wins I'm being treated like I'm such fucking lunatic for predicting Petersen will have us winning one more game than last year.

I saw KrisvashonFS on her twitter say Petersen should win coach of the year if he goes 9-4. I see most Doogs are saying 8 wins as you can't expect a first year coach to just come in and win right away.

I also think the Doogs are secretely hoping for 8 wins so they can go "See told you it takes time, told you Sark wasn't the problem". The Doogs loyalties to Sark far outweighs their loyalties to UW.

I know for a fact if Kim could choose 8-5 or 10-3 he'd choose 8-5.

CuntWaffle

Met a couple of the players recently. One of them said they just couldn't really "buy in" with Sark and said the change with the coaching staff has been fantastic.

section8

He_Needs_More_Time said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Not to jack the thread but I think Petersen is going to kill it overall and get off to a fast start with a better than expected season this year. The national consensus is 9-10 wins and some husky fans might think we can go 11-3. I think we go 12-2. Read between the lines in what many players have said. I think they play harder and better and I think the team will be closer together than last year. If Petersen is coaching last year we might have gone 11-2 instead of 9-4.

Yea I don't see a Petersen coached team losing a game due to piss poor kickoffs like Sark did at Stanford. UCLA was really there for the taking but Sark was too immature of a coach to pull that one off. Down 10 with about 8 minutes to go facing a 4th and 2 on your 40? Easy call there but Sark not only goes for it but he has his backup QB throw a slant to Stringfellow who prior to that game wasn't seeing a ton of playing time.

I have to question these "great" fans as well. For being such "great" fans these Doogs sure as fuck don't know our schedule. Every time I predict 10 wins I'm being treated like I'm such fucking lunatic for predicting Petersen will have us winning one more game than last year.

I saw KrisvashonFS on her twitter say Petersen should win coach of the year if he goes 9-4. I see most Doogs are saying 8 wins as you can't expect a first year coach to just come in and win right away.

I also think the Doogs are secretely hoping for 8 wins so they can go "See told you it takes time, told you Sark wasn't the problem". The Doogs loyalties to Sark far outweighs their loyalties to UW.

I know for a fact if Kim could choose 8-5 or 10-3 he'd choose 8-5.

Shit, Kim would take 5-8 if it meant full access to the players and coaches, that guy cares more about his own inflated ego than watching a winning team.

MikeDamone

CuntWaffle said:

Met a couple of the players recently. One of them said they just couldn't really "buy in" with Sark and said the change with the coaching staff has been fantastic.

Did every player speak about the difference?

BennyBeaver

For my sake I hope this pans out as spectacularly as the Doogs on this forum expect. I don't wan't to be inconvenienced by all the Aurora bridge divers when you go 8-4.

CuntWaffle

MikeDamone said:

CuntWaffle said:

Met a couple of the players recently. One of them said they just couldn't really "buy in" with Sark and said the change with the coaching staff has been fantastic.

Did every player speak about the difference?

New scheme new attitude is what I interpreted from the convo.

[Deleted User]

MikeDamone said:

CuntWaffle said:

Met a couple of the players recently. One of them said they just couldn't really "buy in" with Sark and said the change with the coaching staff has been fantastic.

Did every player speak about the difference?

Stringfellow sure did. Hearing Petersen is just like Ty. Now I didn't say he is just like Ty just said he is acting just like Ty.

Learn the fucking difference already.

TierbsHsotBoobs

section8 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Not to jack the thread but I think Petersen is going to kill it overall and get off to a fast start with a better than expected season this year. The national consensus is 9-10 wins and some husky fans might think we can go 11-3. I think we go 12-2. Read between the lines in what many players have said. I think they play harder and better and I think the team will be closer together than last year. If Petersen is coaching last year we might have gone 11-2 instead of 9-4.

Yea I don't see a Petersen coached team losing a game due to piss poor kickoffs like Sark did at Stanford. UCLA was really there for the taking but Sark was too immature of a coach to pull that one off. Down 10 with about 8 minutes to go facing a 4th and 2 on your 40? Easy call there but Sark not only goes for it but he has his backup QB throw a slant to Stringfellow who prior to that game wasn't seeing a ton of playing time.

I have to question these "great" fans as well. For being such "great" fans these Doogs sure as fuck don't know our schedule. Every time I predict 10 wins I'm being treated like I'm such fucking lunatic for predicting Petersen will have us winning one more game than last year.

I saw KrisvashonFS on her twitter say Petersen should win coach of the year if he goes 9-4. I see most Doogs are saying 8 wins as you can't expect a first year coach to just come in and win right away.

I also think the Doogs are secretely hoping for 8 wins so they can go "See told you it takes time, told you Sark wasn't the problem". The Doogs loyalties to Sark far outweighs their loyalties to UW.

I know for a fact if Kim could choose 8-5 or 10-3 he'd choose 8-5.

Shit, Kim would take 0-13 if it meant full access to the players and coaches, that guy cares more about his own inflated ego than watching a winning team.

haie

I don't have much to add to this other than how pumped I am for this season with what feels like a completely different team. To go from this:

(after 08) "On his way out of Pullman to the airport, Woodward pulled over where no one else was around and screamed into a field."

...to the article posted. UW finally gives a shit about football again something the alumni/students and especially the fans deserve.

#NotTheSameExcitementAsTyandDudeBra

HuskyJW

The fact they won nine games and had to deal with 7 less feet in elevation....you guys are lucky Sark even coached here at all.