Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Next CNN head to roll?
Comments
-
You're actually trying to argue that you're unemotional about abortion? Okay Creep.creepycoug said:
How about you fuck off with that part; people word vomit the same shit here over and over 24/7/365. That is well beyond dispute.TurdBomber said:
You've had more than enough of your say. I think the points are made and the mountains cannot be moved at this point. I also believe compromise is the way forward on the abortion issue, because you are never going to convince more than half the country to make it illegal, no matter how great your argument or position is.creepycoug said:
Your quote of my post was directed at a poster who wrote that my views on the matter were the emotional rants of a low information psychopath not interested in a "real" discussion, where that is ostensibly not the case, and laughable at best coming from him relative to me given that his grasp on the matter is fairly basic.TurdBomber said:
We've all got bigger fish to fry, like surviving annual 10% inflation and locating food a year from now.creepycoug said:
Well of course I care a lot. That's dumb.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Sounds like you care a lot
My position is limit it to the first trimester. I've said that before. I read a lot of threads in the Tug and yes, you post in some. I don't get wrapped up in it and it's not my life's crusade. It's private matter. Killing a mid or late stage fetus seems abhorrent to me so those should be banned. I don't lose sleep over what strangers do with their bodies. You seem to.
So, "her body, her choice". And limit to first trimester because ... I don't know, seems like a good spot. Even though we're talking about infanticide here.
Got it. As I said, you got nothing.
So, no, IDNGAF about abortion rights and timelines at this point in my life. And should they become relevant to me in the future, I will support abortion in general, even though I detest it personally, because I don't want anyone telling me what I can do with my body, so reciprocity is in order.
I don't vote on abortion. That's what low info emotional types and psychos like you do, along with the fundies and leftist chicks who nobody wants to fuck. You're obsessed with it, and you're not interested in a real discussion, just some four minute internet conversion and making more flailing attempts to prove how great you are.
It's an important issue, and you are going to be just fine in one year's time. Please. Eons of time is spent/wasted in the Tug "obsessing", truly obsessing, about things enumerable, most of which you can't fry either; so I really don't see the problem with me arguing this point. For those who want to worry about starving to death or make their 200,000th post about partisan politics, the deep state and stolen elections, have at it and skip the abortion talk. IDC. But if you or anyone else is going to chime in and debate it with me, the I'm going to say what I'm going to say and DGAFF if anybody likes it or not. Hopefully you find that to be a fair stance.
BTW, Nobody should ever be condemned to carry a rapist's or incestuously impregnated child if they don't want to and I think you're dead wrong, barbaric and misogynist AF to argue otherwise no matter what the circumstances.
Or have you forgotten that slavery is illegal?
Kreist.
You're dealing in practicalities of the matter, and that's fine. I don't dispute those points, and never have. I do reject your entire argument and accompanying emotional rhetoric about rape/incest, especially the analogy to slavery, for reasons I've already articulated, as you point out. Happy to discuss it like an adult, but something tells me that's not on the table, which is fine.
Viewed objectively, it seems you and your less gifted counterpart are more emotionally dialed into this than am I. I'm just making an argument that you and some others don't like.
WTF are @Sledog and @MikeDamone when I need them?
You can have your scientific argument, which I technically agree with. But it's a loser, bud.
It's all been done before and might succeed in convincing some Mississippians or Alabamans to go your way.
But could you look your own daughter or wife in the eye and say, "you're not aborting your rapist's child, and THAT'S IT!!
I didn't think so. Reality awaits your return, Creep. -
-
-
-
-
RaceBannon said:
-
Back when blow was uncut and the tits were real baby.RaceBannon said: -
-
Everyone here should know by now I'm dead set against abortion. How people with children could ever support such a thing is beyond comprehension. Stupid people do stupid shit.
I am pro retroactive abortion for adults. I get to be the sole arbiter. -
I'm on the road. Not keeping up here very well. Vacations are better than vaccines.creepycoug said:
How about you fuck off with that part; people word vomit the same shit here over and over 24/7/365. That is well beyond dispute.TurdBomber said:
You've had more than enough of your say. I think the points are made and the mountains cannot be moved at this point. I also believe compromise is the way forward on the abortion issue, because you are never going to convince more than half the country to make it illegal, no matter how great your argument or position is.creepycoug said:
Your quote of my post was directed at a poster who wrote that my views on the matter were the emotional rants of a low information psychopath not interested in a "real" discussion, where that is ostensibly not the case, and laughable at best coming from him relative to me given that his grasp on the matter is fairly basic.TurdBomber said:
We've all got bigger fish to fry, like surviving annual 10% inflation and locating food a year from now.creepycoug said:
Well of course I care a lot. That's dumb.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Sounds like you care a lot
My position is limit it to the first trimester. I've said that before. I read a lot of threads in the Tug and yes, you post in some. I don't get wrapped up in it and it's not my life's crusade. It's private matter. Killing a mid or late stage fetus seems abhorrent to me so those should be banned. I don't lose sleep over what strangers do with their bodies. You seem to.
So, "her body, her choice". And limit to first trimester because ... I don't know, seems like a good spot. Even though we're talking about infanticide here.
Got it. As I said, you got nothing.
So, no, IDNGAF about abortion rights and timelines at this point in my life. And should they become relevant to me in the future, I will support abortion in general, even though I detest it personally, because I don't want anyone telling me what I can do with my body, so reciprocity is in order.
I don't vote on abortion. That's what low info emotional types and psychos like you do, along with the fundies and leftist chicks who nobody wants to fuck. You're obsessed with it, and you're not interested in a real discussion, just some four minute internet conversion and making more flailing attempts to prove how great you are.
It's an important issue, and you are going to be just fine in one year's time. Please. Eons of time is spent/wasted in the Tug "obsessing", truly obsessing, about things enumerable, most of which you can't fry either; so I really don't see the problem with me arguing this point. For those who want to worry about starving to death or make their 200,000th post about partisan politics, the deep state and stolen elections, have at it and skip the abortion talk. IDC. But if you or anyone else is going to chime in and debate it with me, the I'm going to say what I'm going to say and DGAFF if anybody likes it or not. Hopefully you find that to be a fair stance.
BTW, Nobody should ever be condemned to carry a rapist's or incestuously impregnated child if they don't want to and I think you're dead wrong, barbaric and misogynist AF to argue otherwise no matter what the circumstances.
Or have you forgotten that slavery is illegal?
Kreist.
You're dealing in practicalities of the matter, and that's fine. I don't dispute those points, and never have. I do reject your entire argument and accompanying emotional rhetoric about rape/incest, especially the analogy to slavery, for reasons I've already articulated, as you point out. Happy to discuss it like an adult, but something tells me that's not on the table, which is fine.
Viewed objectively, it seems you and your less gifted counterpart are more emotionally dialed into this than am I. I'm just making an argument that you and some others don't like.
WTF are @Sledog and @MikeDamone when I need them?
